Thanks this science is an extremely important addition to the data around 
spirituality.
 -Buck in the Dome
 

 

 LEnglish5 offers:
 

  Fred Travis' article published in the New York Academy of Sciences that 
discusses the preliminary research on Cosmic Consciousness:
 
 

 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.12316/full 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.12316/full

 

 

 Specific research on pure consciousness discussed in that paper:
 

 Breath Suspension During the Transcendental Meditation Technique 
http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/content/44/2/133.full.pdf
 

 Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Respiratory Suspension Periods Occurring 
During the Practice of the Transcendental Meditation Program 
 http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/content/46/3/267.full.pdf
 

 Autonomic patterns during respiratory suspensions: Possible markers of 
Transcendental Consciousness 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/transcendental-consciousness.pdf
 

 

 

 Correlates of stabilization of pure consciousness, aka "Cosmic Consciousenss" 
-the preliminary stage of enlightenment in TM-theory:

 

  Psychological 
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf
 physiological 

 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf

 

 

 

 L




 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <rick@...> wrote :

 I have this idea kicking around in my head to try to interview Sam Harris, or 
someone like him. An intelligent atheist, as I understand him. I’d want to read 
all his books first, and then hash out the likely points of discussion with you 
beforehand. We could do it on FFL. My perspective is very SCI-like – that 
intelligence is omnipresent, all-pervading, and obvious if one looks closely 
enough. I’m interviewing a guy named Bernardo Kastrup in a couple of months who 
has written a book called “Why Materialism is Baloney”, but it would be fun to 
interview an intelligent materialist, if that’s what Harris is, and see if we 
could find any common ground. What do you think?





Reply via email to