RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: On Maharishi Channel now

2008-02-10 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 12:40 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: On Maharishi Channel now

 

Man, I had some of the most fabulous TM teachers
for residence courses in my early years of TM--
charisma out the wazoo, and just brilliant on the
teaching (e.g., Jim McCain). 

Jim McCann is an old friend of mine. We met in the 7th grade, went to prep
school together. I lived with his family for years. I’ll pass your
compliment along to him. 

Janet Hoffmann, chair
of the Manhattan TM Center, was no slouch either.

Janet is also a dear friend. A little uncomfortable with me these days
though, ‘cause I’m such a renegade. We taught dozens of residence courses
together, mostly in Asbury Park and Lock Sheldrake. Did you attend any?


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 2/9/2008
11:54 AM
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On Maharishi Channel now

2008-02-10 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:14 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:


Maharishi bet on the wrong horses IMO.  He chose people with zero
personal charisma.


I've never understood this one either, Curtis.  Not only picking  
those with the least personal charisma, but then having them dress  
like Brooks Bros clones.



  If he wanted to let his teaching have a chance of
continuing after his death, he should have started grooming Ravi
Shankar when I met him in India in 80


Ravi was one of the best-looking men I'd ever seen when I met him, so  
I couldn't agree more.  :)


Sal




RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: On Maharishi Channel now

2008-02-10 Thread Rick Archer
When John first hit the scene I agree. He had a good vibe and plenty
of charisma. I don't know if he changed or I did, but he started to
sound like a train of cliches after a while. Same thing happened to
Doug Henning after he spent so much time with Maharishi personally.

Interesting comment. Note that all the people whose voices we’re complaining
about have spent more time around MMY than anyone. What was it about
proximity to MMY, or immersion in the scene around him, that did that to
people’s personalities? I’d say it was an atmosphere in which there was
intense pressure to conform in many ways – to the “purity of the teaching,”
to MMY’s “thinking,” including world’s tallest buildings, weight in gold,
crowns and titles, etc. Disagreeing with any of this got you a one-way
ticket out of there, which, if you had come to belief that M’s inner circle
was the evolutionary apex of planet Earth, meant demotion to an inferior
existence – derailment on the fast track to enlightenment. So you stifled
your doubts and took another step away from common sense and your natural,
God-given personality towards strange, stilted behavior.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 2/9/2008
11:54 AM
 


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: On Maharishi Channel now

2008-02-10 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 1:21 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: On Maharishi Channel now

 

 Janet Hoffmann, chair
 of the Manhattan TM Center, was no slouch either.

 Janet is also a dear friend. A little uncomfortable with me
 these days though, `cause I'm such a renegade.

She's still chair of the Manhattan Center, is she?

I believe she is, although she spends a lot of time in FF. She was there
when I walked into the TM center at 123 E. 78th street in 1968, and she’s
been there ever since. I once praised her for her longevity as center
chairman in NYC and she said “What else am I going to do, Ricky? Work in
some office as a secretary?”

Never had a residence course with Janet; and
by the time I was taking courses at Asbury Park,
they were WPAs rather than residence courses.
I don't even know where Lock Sheldrake is.

Up in the Catskillss near Livingston Manor. I guess it was Loch Sheldrake:
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Loch+Sheldrake,+NY,+USAsa=Xoi=mapct=title

I took residence courses at Litchfield, CT; 

I taught some there. ‘71/’72 and ’76.

Armonk
and Livingston Manor, NY; 

There too.

Oh,
Peter Muldavin was another superb teacher.

http://www.kiddierekordking.com/about.html

And the best teacher on *any* subject I've ever had
anywhere was a 50-ish lady first name of Susan. 

Can’t place her.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 2/9/2008
11:54 AM
 


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: was- Maharishi Channel. now- King Tony to rule from 'Silence

2008-02-10 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:38 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: was- Maharishi Channel. now- King Tony to rule
from 'Silence

 

 The irony of this is that he is the best speaker of all these guys. At
least
 he used to be. I watched some of the early MOU courses and most of the
 speakers were weird and boring as hell. But Tony was natural and naturally
 held my attention. Now he�s relegated to silence. 
 

So you think he's been silenced? I think he's just decided he doesn't like
the limelight.

I think Maharishi defined his role, and he acquiesced to Maharishi’s
intentions. I doubt he exercised much individual will.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date: 2/10/2008
12:21 PM