Judy, high rent districts is a slang term and thus not meant to be taken
literally.
On Mon, 10/14/13, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: How the Supreme Court Resolve the
Debt-Ceiling Crisis
and thus not meant to be taken
literally.
On Mon, 10/14/13, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: How the Supreme Court Resolve the
Debt-Ceiling Crisis
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday
Judy, when I say unsustainable I mean something that takes more energy to
continue than it generates.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:21 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
As a slang term, it refers to expensive neighborhoods, which wasn't what you
were talking about.
Share wrote:
Judy, when I say unsustainable I mean something that takes
more energy to continue than it generates.
No, sorry, that makes no sense. The something that we've been talking about
is areas with high housing costs. And remember, with the term unsustainable,
you were making
Now I am curious about this. A high rent district is unsustainable because it
takes more energy to continue than it generates? I would have thought you
might have meant the high cost of living in these expensive neighborhoods that
seem to be, according to you, on the East and West Coasts of the
Judy and Ann, I am using the word unsustainable in a very abstract yet applied
way. Any situation or thing or relationship that takes more energy than it
generates is IMO unsustainable and will eventually end.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:08 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com
As I said, that makes no sense in this context. What will eventually end?
Share wrote:
Judy and Ann, I am using the word unsustainable in a very abstract yet
applied
way. Any situation or thing or relationship that takes more energy than it
generates is IMO unsustainable and will
Share: Hint, try explaining what you meant in a way that could be interpreted
at face value. This..[Any situation or thing or relationship that takes
more energy than it generates is IMO unsustainable and will eventually end,
especially for an aging population] makes no sense whatsoever.
shucks, I thought Dale Evans had joined FFL and was sharing our antics with her
hubby Roy (-:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:51 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Share: Hint, try explaining what you meant in a way that could be interpreted
at face value.
Share, you replied to the wrong conversation here. Oh yes, you know this don't
you? Sharester, in general, as an observation, your attempts to obfuscate are
obvious. Check it out!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
shucks, I thought Dale Evans
Judy, another angle: to the extent that something is self energizing, it will
be self sustaining. To the extent it is self sustaining, to that extent it will
continue.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
As I said, that makes no sense in this context.
Share, no, you're still just pulling crap out of your ass instead of dealing
with what Emily, Ann, and I have been pointing out to you. You do not make
yourself look clever when you do that, to the contrary. As Emily says, your
attempts to obfuscate (including this one) are obvious. You aren't
Made ya look!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Share, you replied to the wrong conversation here. Oh yes, you know this
don't you? Sharester, in general, as an observation, your attempts to
obfuscate are obvious. Check it out!
---In
Judy, unsustainable as in reliance on fossil fuels because we're running out of
them and they pollute horribly and they're expensive.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:04 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Share, no, you're still just pulling crap out of your ass
Nope, that's no good either. Has nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at
hand.
What is keeping you from addressing the issue here? You must know you're not
convincing anybody that you're even trying to deal with it. Is it fear? Are you
afraid that if you do try to deal with it, you'll
Judy, I'm not trying to convince anybody of anything. To me my point was
obvious when I referred to an aging population. I think overly expensive
housing is unsustainable for those living on fixed and low incomes.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:43 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
You must have meant more than that, Share. Overly expensive housing is
unsustainable for anyone who doesn't have an overly high income. And of
course it doesn't matter how old you are. Nobody needs to be convinced of
that, nor does anyone even need to have the point made. It's a truism.
OK, so it isn't districts, it's cities; and it isn't high rent, it's high
housing costs in general.
Now that we've clarified that, please explain what you mean by unsustainable
in specific terms. What do you expect to happen?
Share wrote:
I'll do better than that, Judy. Here's a very
Reminds me of the year Seattle refused to salt the roads in an effort to be
green and create pack...ha ha...idealism at its finest; the potholes created
that winter were the best ever.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2008551284_snowcleanup23m.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
