Buck wrote:
> There's lots of tragedy and injustice to be read in the news otherwise. So
> what are you going to
> do about it?
Can't do anything about it unless we know about it, can we?
> These post as they are have nothing to do with FFL as they are posted. The
> FFL home page
> says “almost” anything.
No, it says "pretty much anything."
> These posts as they are made have nothing to do with FFL.
Posts on FFL don't have to have anything to do with life in Fairfield,
according to the home page description.
If you want a group that is allowed to discuss only life in Fairfield, you
should start one. FFL isn't it.
> Content and Context. These authors are lazy
As I recall, you were the guy who was fulminating about ad hominem here not
long ago.
> and should be proscribed from posting any further shit like this thread
> without context related
> to FFL. More later, I'm off to the Dome to meditate this morning, I want
> justice for FFL.
> I want moderation to return to the FFL community.
There never has been the kind of moderation you want on FFL, so there isn't
anything to "return to."
Grow up, Buck.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:
Buck, the Group Description does say that any topic is fair game. As
horrifying as this story is, I think it's essential for people to know about
it, whether those people are spiritual or not, religious or not, political or
not. If we are to be fully developed human beings, we must, I think, bring to
bear our awareness and concern and outrage onto such stories. It's part of
taking a stand for whatever we hold dear, whether we call that spiritual or
just being truly human.
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:30 AM, "dhamiltony2k5@..." <dhamiltony2k5@...>
wrote:
This tread is an example of what? Spiritual decorum? Could folks here
please read the home page description for Fairfield Life. Could someone please
relate this thread to our more particular spiritual concerns on this list here
or remove it or remove themselves for straying so far from topic. Content and
context. It clearly is time to bring back the FFL post limit to the community
here. I vote for 30 posts max per week. If our dear dear FFL moderator will run
the post-count script I would be glad to remove people from posting who can't
control themselves.
Yours in Consciousness of the Unified Field,
-Buck
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:
The guy has filed a federal lawsuit suiing the police and the hospital for
violation of his 4th Amendment rights and is also suing the doctors for
malpractice. The whole story has gone viral, and a second one like it has now
turned up. The first guy is likely to get a fat settlement; what they did to
him is way beyond the pale.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:
It seems that David Eckert has to pay the costs of the anal probes he endured!
Can he claim the money back on Obamacare?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:
David Eckert failed to make a complete stop when he pulled out of a Walmart
store. A police officer then asked David to get out of his car and claimed he
saw Eckert "clenching his buttocks" which supposedly was a sign that Eckert had
drugs in his anal cavity.
Eckert’s abdominal area was X-rayed; no narcotics were found. Doctors then
performed an examination of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were
found. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no
narcotics were found. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema.
Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert
watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found. Doctors
penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a second time. Eckert was forced to
defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors
searched his stool. No narcotics were found. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus
to insert an enema a third time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of
doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No
narcotics were found. Doctors then X-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were
found. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed a
colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert’s anus,
rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were found.
http://tinyurl.com/k86d9dv http://tinyurl.com/k86d9dv
