Share, no, you're still just pulling crap out of your ass instead of dealing
with what Emily, Ann, and I have been pointing out to you. You do not make
yourself look clever when you do that, to the contrary. As Emily says, your
attempts to obfuscate (including this one) are obvious. You aren't
Made ya look!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Share, you replied to the wrong conversation here. Oh yes, you know this
don't you? Sharester, in general, as an observation, your attempts to
obfuscate are obvious. Check it out!
---In
Judy, unsustainable as in reliance on fossil fuels because we're running out of
them and they pollute horribly and they're expensive.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:04 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Share, no, you're still just pulling crap out of your ass
Nope, that's no good either. Has nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at
hand.
What is keeping you from addressing the issue here? You must know you're not
convincing anybody that you're even trying to deal with it. Is it fear? Are you
afraid that if you do try to deal with it, you'll
Judy, I'm not trying to convince anybody of anything. To me my point was
obvious when I referred to an aging population. I think overly expensive
housing is unsustainable for those living on fixed and low incomes.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:43 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
You must have meant more than that, Share. Overly expensive housing is
unsustainable for anyone who doesn't have an overly high income. And of
course it doesn't matter how old you are. Nobody needs to be convinced of
that, nor does anyone even need to have the point made. It's a truism.
