RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Has Barry been forging my email again?? I'll skin him alive. I guess he's trying to scrounge a bit of income now that he's left his job. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: Are you *sure* there is no such thing as the MGC? Because if that's the case, I just wired my thousand dollar 'Platinum' initiation fee to someone, who I thought was you, in Nigeria. You even attached those pics from your camera safari - The giraffes, and the chimp wearing a fez. You said you'd be back stateside soon, and my scroll, and ceremonial ring would be arriving shortly. What's going on?? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Share snarled: Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was their outrage then?! In the first place, there's no such thing as MGC. That's a fantasy of Barry's. In the second place, what the hell does indiff's language (whatever that refers to) have to do with our exchanges? This is just more avoidance on your part, trying to change the subject.
RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Re: I do not initiate attack. Share has re-written reality in order to justify her post to you yesterday which wasn't even close to an in kind response. Then, she chooses to defend her reality re-write like it represents truth so she doesn't have to accept responsibility for her own behavior and motivations. Of course, I can't see her figment of imagination in her own mind. Share, try and be kind today. Standing up for yourself involves accepting your own behavior first and having the guts to own it, not fighting a battle to preserve your self-created delusions. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Heck! It might even help global warming! But what about horses?! On Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:19 AM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was their outrage then?! It's still about RWC for them imo and that's why they exempt their buddies from their protestations, moral posturings, etc. and focus on me. Going by what others here have said, you are the queen of grudge holding and as such your words have little value from my perspective. Same for Ann and Emily when they're in that prejudiced and or nasty mode. And to answer the MGC posts from last night: one of your most vicious tactics imo is to poison a fun exchange I'm having with another poster. Which usually happens when I've been ignoring you all. IMO this is what Ann did, despite all of her clever and or politically correct utterances and your moral posturing. And I don't feel like a victim at all. I feel like someone who has stood up appropriately for herself. From the beginning of all this, you initiate attack, Judy and I defend myself as I see fit. I do not initiate attack and that is, I think an important difference. One that you will more likely neither see nor admit. Will this help? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:45 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song wise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding in-kind. Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused
Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was their outrage then?! It's still about RWC for them imo and that's why they exempt their buddies from their protestations, moral posturings, etc. and focus on me. Going by what others here have said, you are the queen of grudge holding and as such your words have little value from my perspective. Same for Ann and Emily when they're in that prejudiced and or nasty mode. And to answer the MGC posts from last night: one of your most vicious tactics imo is to poison a fun exchange I'm having with another poster. Which usually happens when I've been ignoring you all. IMO this is what Ann did, despite all of her clever and or politically correct utterances and your moral posturing. And I don't feel like a victim at all. I feel like someone who has stood up appropriately for herself. From the beginning of all this, you initiate attack, Judy and I defend myself as I see fit. I do not initiate attack and that is, I think an important difference. One that you will more likely neither see nor admit. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:45 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song wise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding in-kind. Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you
RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
*YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I did not write these words to her. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid. Share babbled: Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I did not write these words to her. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me. Except I did not write those words to her, directly nor via the forum. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid. Share babbled: Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I did not write these words to her. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Sorry, Share, but no objective person is going to see your post to Ann as anything other than exceptionally nasty, especially given that Ann's post was just a funny parody. No, you haven't claimed sainthood, but the way you behave is clearly designed to make you appear to be saintly. That is, except when you lose control and behave like a vengeful harpy. The only times you're authentic is when you're being venomous and hateful. The saintly act is pathetically, creepily phony, and you confirm it's phony when the real Share shows through. Share excreted: Of course this is your opinion, Judy because you are not objective about me or Ann. I've never claimed sainthood. Your projection, your fantasies. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:21 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Ann has never come anywhere near the vicious nastiness of your attack on her. Face it, Share, you lost control. You let the mask slip, and we all saw the ugliness underneath. It's slipped before and given us glimpses, but now you have to live with the knowledge that this time we got a really good look, and the faux-sainthood is down the tubes, exposed as a lie. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the past year. MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems they can dish it out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Judy if you are against someone, you assert that their faults are the *real person. And you actually revel in seeing those faults. If someone is positive, then you say they are phoney. Worse of all, you over and over present your opinions as facts. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:20 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Sorry, Share, but no objective person is going to see your post to Ann as anything other than exceptionally nasty, especially given that Ann's post was just a funny parody. No, you haven't claimed sainthood, but the way you behave is clearly designed to make you appear to be saintly. That is, except when you lose control and behave like a vengeful harpy. The only times you're authentic is when you're being venomous and hateful. The saintly act is pathetically, creepily phony, and you confirm it's phony when the real Share shows through. Share excreted: Of course this is your opinion, Judy because you are not objective about me or Ann. I've never claimed sainthood. Your projection, your fantasies. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:21 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Ann has never come anywhere near the vicious nastiness of your attack on her. Face it, Share, you lost control. You let the mask slip, and we all saw the ugliness underneath. It's slipped before and given us glimpses, but now you have to live with the knowledge that this time we got a really good look, and the faux-sainthood is down the tubes, exposed as a lie. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the past year. MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems they can dish it out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.
RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
As I said: Share isn't really this stupid. She just pretends to be this stupid. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me. Except I did not write those words to her, directly nor via the forum. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:08 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid. Share babbled: Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I did not write these words to her. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
I did not write those words to Emily so I don't know why she put them in quotes. Richard, do you know what Judy is getting at? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:48 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: As I said: Share isn't really this stupid. She just pretends to be this stupid. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me. Except I did not write those words to her, directly nor via the forum. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:08 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid. Share babbled: Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I did not write these words to her. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Says Share, doing her Avoidance Dance. Absolute refusal to deal with the reality of the viciousness of her post about Ann. As to your attempt to change the subject, I do some of what you describe in some cases when it appears to apply. Now let's see if you can show the kind of integrity Emily did with regard to Obbajeeba and Susan, and amend what you wrote so it's not wildly inaccurate. I'm betting you can't. Oh, and while you're at it, notice how you presented your opinion as fact, as you do all too frequently. Hypocrite. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy if you are against someone, you assert that their faults are the *real person. And you actually revel in seeing those faults. If someone is positive, then you say they are phoney. Worse of all, you over and over present your opinions as facts. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:20 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Sorry, Share, but no objective person is going to see your post to Ann as anything other than exceptionally nasty, especially given that Ann's post was just a funny parody. No, you haven't claimed sainthood, but the way you behave is clearly designed to make you appear to be saintly. That is, except when you lose control and behave like a vengeful harpy. The only times you're authentic is when you're being venomous and hateful. The saintly act is pathetically, creepily phony, and you confirm it's phony when the real Share shows through. Share excreted: Of course this is your opinion, Judy because you are not objective about me or Ann. I've never claimed sainthood. Your projection, your fantasies. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:21 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Ann has never come anywhere near the vicious nastiness of your attack on her. Face it, Share, you lost control. You let the mask slip, and we all saw the ugliness underneath. It's slipped before and given us glimpses, but now you have to live with the knowledge that this time we got a really good look, and the faux-sainthood is down the tubes, exposed as a lie. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the past year. MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems they can dish it out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Ah, one of the few times I forget to put imo and Judy lands on it like a tick on a hound dog in Alabamie in July! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Says Share, doing her Avoidance Dance. Absolute refusal to deal with the reality of the viciousness of her post about Ann. As to your attempt to change the subject, I do some of what you describe in some cases when it appears to apply. Now let's see if you can show the kind of integrity Emily did with regard to Obbajeeba and Susan, and amend what you wrote so it's not wildly inaccurate. I'm betting you can't. Oh, and while you're at it, notice how you presented your opinion as fact, as you do all too frequently. Hypocrite. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy if you are against someone, you assert that their faults are the *real person. And you actually revel in seeing those faults. If someone is positive, then you say they are phoney. Worse of all, you over and over present your opinions as facts. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:20 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Sorry, Share, but no objective person is going to see your post to Ann as anything other than exceptionally nasty, especially given that Ann's post was just a funny parody. No, you haven't claimed sainthood, but the way you behave is clearly designed to make you appear to be saintly. That is, except when you lose control and behave like a vengeful harpy. The only times you're authentic is when you're being venomous and hateful. The saintly act is pathetically, creepily phony, and you confirm it's phony when the real Share shows through. Share excreted: Of course this is your opinion, Judy because you are not objective about me or Ann. I've never claimed sainthood. Your projection, your fantasies. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:21 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Ann has never come anywhere near the vicious nastiness of your attack on her. Face it, Share, you lost control. You let the mask slip, and we all saw the ugliness underneath. It's slipped before and given us glimpses, but now you have to live with the knowledge that this time we got a really good look, and the faux-sainthood is down the tubes, exposed as a lie. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the past year. MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems they can dish it out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.
RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
HAHAHAHAHA! Yes, pretend not to understand and ask Richard. That'll really help. Do you think you can make yourself look just a little bit more ridiculous, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I did not write those words to Emily so I don't know why she put them in quotes. Richard, do you know what Judy is getting at? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:48 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: As I said: Share isn't really this stupid. She just pretends to be this stupid. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me. Except I did not write those words to her, directly nor via the forum. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:08 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid. Share babbled: Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I did not write these words to her. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, Share. Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS SHARE* ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Share bleated: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Oh, Share, don't be absurd. Still feeling guilty about that, are you? Good grief. As if there weren't enough else to criticize you for, both before and after your RWC debacle. Anyway, your good buddy Barry claims it's because you won't attack him. You don't want to make Barry feel less important than Robin, now, do you? Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. (belly laugh) Jeepers. I asked if you could be a little bit more ridiculous, and sure enough, you could. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. No, you aren't. You fantasize that that's what I am and drive yourself crazy with frustration. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. My God. She really is that stupid. And after I went to the trouble to explain things to her. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. When the behavior I dislike doesn't change and even gets worse, as it has with you, no, I'm not likely to suddenly begin to see the person in a better light, know what I mean? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as.
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
For the record, well before you got here, Emily, Barry attacked my appearance a number of times. So did Edg once after I'd said something that annoyed him, but he sort of took it back later. Barry never has, of course. Fortunately, like Ann, I'm not insecure about my appearance, so Barry's attempts didn't do me any damage, much as he hoped they would. Peas in a pod, Barry and Share. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding in-kind. Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
You know who turned Ann's funny parody post into something poisonous and vicious, Share? Hint: It wasn't Ann. (Or me or Emily, either.) Share blubbered: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. Oh, good, Share will continue to reveal how much meaner she is than any of the rest of us. But it really is odd that Share, after several years participating in various Web forums, is still under the misapprehension that she should be able to hold a private conversation, in which nobody else is supposed to participate, in public. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. More than once, as I just told Emily. He seems to have realized how bad it made him look, though. How long will it take you, I wonder? Grow up, for Christ's sake. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Here's a song for you and Barry, Share. Why you gotta be so mean? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgrJT8tVdZw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgrJT8tVdZw ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding in-kind. Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Look out Judy, Share has an insider track on what people are saying on the internet about you. Apparently she has been taking some time to investigate your reputation. I wonder what has compelled her to prepare in this way. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. Think again. Poisoned? Being a bit dramatic are we not? Or merely illustrating your dire lack of sense of humour? They don't call it a sense for nothing Share. It is a sort of gift to be able to laugh at things, and not in a mean way. You are a martyr Share and a melodramatic one at that. Give it up. No one has screwed your husband, beaten or killed your child nor have they caused you to lose your job. All I did was have fun and parody your little girl suck-up to Richard regarding the quinoa in Whole Foods. Get a grip. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding in-kind. Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting);
RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song wise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding in-kind. Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the bad part of the blend of good and bad (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't strong and beautiful and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not cute, you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not*
RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-Y82ifoTjs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-Y82ifoTjs Share spewed: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Ann wrote: Look out Judy, Share has an insider track on what people are saying on the internet about you. Apparently she has been taking some time to investigate your reputation. I wonder what has compelled her to prepare in this way.
