Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Judy, I don't think I got it wrong. BTW, instinct would be nature and the way one was brought up would be nurture. They are traditionally considered opposites, not the same as your writing indicates here. From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:59 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I guess it's just my instinct--the way I was brought up--to apologize if I've gotten something as badly wrong as Share did (and often does). It's not really a matter of owing an apology so much as noticing who has that instinct and who doesn't. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before HuffPo. You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Judy wrote apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which FFL editor would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say shifting context? Can you say Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons? I think you can.
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
LOL, I kind of like that: utterly hopeless nitwit. I guess we're both bonkers! Now Dudy, think carefully, did I really claim to turq that you insisted etc. or did I make a little joke to him? From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:32 AM Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Share fumbles the ball (again): Judy, you've gone totally bonkers. Again! Not only did I not call you a liar, but when turq called you that, I actually replied to him that you changed your mind and I did not consider that lying. I was defending you not trying to *get* you! You utterly hopeless nitwit. I'm talking about your idiotic post to Barry claiming I insisted on using the definite article for HuffPo, and the subsequent exchange in which you said you didn't think I was telling the truth when I explained what your stupid mistake was. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:05 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Ann wrote: Who wants an apology? I think the lady was looking for factual back up of Xeno's assertions about her. No, this was actually about Share having made one of her idiotic bloopers trying to get me in a post to Barry, then resisting the facts tooth and nail, making mistake after mistake, to the point of calling me a liar, then claiming I wasn't balanced. I observed that she hadn't apologized for all the mistakes or the accusations, suggesting that this didn't exactly say much for her own balance. Steve assumed, incorrectly and nastily, that I was demanding an apology; I set him straight, but Barry only read Steve's post and decided to pile on. However, on the subject of theoretical apologies, what does it say about someone who can notapologize? Or who thinks apologies are never warranted? My theory: that kind of person is incapable of apologizing because their ego is so bloated while at the same time fragile. That wouldn't be you, would it dreamboat? Exactly. Is Barry still barging into your dreams and trying to snuggle up to you, BTW?
RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods)
oh, okay. but I've noticed that you seem to be the only one who regularly brings this up. maybe it is a matter of upbringing, although I thought mine was pretty traditional with regard to manners and such. (obviously my grammar and writing structure has taken a turn for the worse) From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:59 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I guess it's just my instinct--the way I was brought up--to apologize if I've gotten something as badly wrong as Share did (and often does). It's not really a matter of owing an apology so much as noticing who has that instinct and who doesn't. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: You've got to wonder how many people owe Judy an apology on this forum? And how many owe her more than one? Maybe a hundred and a thousand! Judy, are you by chance keeping a tally? From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Oh, what a stinging rebuke... (Notice no apology from Share for her incredibly dense misunderstanding. Now, that's balance for you.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And being balanced in any way isn't your best thing, Judy. From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:19 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) You're wrong again, Share. Thinking isn't your best thing. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Right, Judy and you just happened to bring it up after I had written HuffPost. It had absolutely nothing to do with that. I don't think so! From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) It's so very hard to believe the stupidity isn't a put-on. Hate to burst your Stupid Bubble, Share, but I wasn't suggesting you should put a definite article before HuffPo. You shouldn't. My comment referred to the fact that you frequently do leave out the definite article where you SHOULD have one, yet you boast of having taken this advanced grammar course. She isn't going to get it. I know she isn't going to get it. There just aren't enough brain cells to accommodate something this complicated. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Judy wrote apparently forgot she did: Did this grammar course teach you to leave out the definite article? Because I had written: One of my favorite courses in college was an advanced grammar course. The errors I see now even on places like HuffPost amaze me. Ok, this exchange happened under the Lucid Dreaming thread. I guess that's why Judy thinks it was imaginary! From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) I'd say it was, Oh, how quickly they imagine things that never happened! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Oh how quickly they forget! From: authfriend@... authfriend@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:26 PM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) Which FFL editor would that be, Share? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Very bad, turq. According to FFL Editor, you're supposed to say THE HuffPost! Faite attention, s'il vous plait! From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:18 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Projecting (Re: Surviving Whole Foods) snip I posted a link to a funny article in HuffPost about Whole Foods. Only a few people here commented (thanks) on how funny it was. Instead, within six posts Judy had adopted an argumentative tone in a thread about a funny article, and within eleven posts she was calling someone a liar. At last count there were 137 posts in the thread, *most* of them about the tempest in a pisspot she created and then refused to let die. Can you say shifting context? Can you say Doing it for your own petty, self-serving reasons? I think you can.
