RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Pricing TM to Teach [more] Meditators
Share wrote: Emily, IMO it's not just a title. It's a catchy phrase that will stick with people even as they forget the article. Why shouldn't it stick with people? As I said earlier, it isn't just somebody's idle generalization. It's been documented by research. I liked the last 5 paragraphs which expressed hope about people becoming friendly with one another and then ceasing to put negative spins on each other's actions and beliefs. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 8:59 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ooops, that's will not allow.or maybe she will. Share, did you like this article by Daniel Goleman, expert that he is on emotional intelligence? What about the article resonated with you? Is the only comment you have that you don't like the title? Dig deep now. :) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Share, desperate to save face and have the last word in her fight with herself, still cannot and will allow herself to comprehend the article as it was written. Since the 1970s, the gap between the rich and everyone else has skyrocketed. Income inequality is at its highest level in a century. This widening gulf between the haves and have-less troubles me, but not for the obvious reasons. Apart from the financial inequities, I fear the expansion of an entirely different gap, caused by the inability to see oneself in a less advantaged person’s shoes. Reducing the economic gap may be impossible without also addressing the gap in empathy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Buck, I've protested to Daniel Goleman about headline Rich People Just Care Less, asking if it was written by an editor who wants to sell more papers and thus get rich! Meanwhile, may there be peace between Patanjali and Bagambhrini.
Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Pricing TM to Teach [more] Meditators
The use of the word *just* in Rich People Just Care Less. IMO it implies this: Rich People Just Care Less and that's all there is to it. For one thing, it's not scientific at all. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 10:54 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share wrote: Emily, IMO it's not just a title. It's a catchy phrase that will stick with people even as they forget the article. Why shouldn't it stick with people? As I said earlier, it isn't just somebody's idle generalization. It's been documented by research. I liked the last 5 paragraphs which expressed hope about people becoming friendly with one another and then ceasing to put negative spins on each other's actions and beliefs. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 8:59 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ooops, that's will not allow.or maybe she will. Share, did you like this article by Daniel Goleman, expert that he is on emotional intelligence? What about the article resonated with you? Is the only comment you have that you don't like the title? Dig deep now. :) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Share, desperate to save face and have the last word in her fight with herself, still cannot and will allow herself to comprehend the article as it was written. Since the 1970s, the gap between the rich and everyone else has skyrocketed. Income inequality is at its highest level in a century. This widening gulf between the haves and have-less troubles me, but not for the obvious reasons. Apart from the financial inequities, I fear the expansion of an entirely different gap, caused by the inability to see oneself in a less advantaged person’s shoes. Reducing the economic gap may be impossible without also addressing the gap in empathy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Buck, I've protested to Daniel Goleman about headline Rich People Just Care Less, asking if it was written by an editor who wants to sell more papers and thus get rich! Meanwhile, may there be peace between Patanjali and Bagambhrini.
RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Pricing TM to Teach [more] Meditators
One more time: It's a headline, Share. Most adults who read newspapers understand that there's more to an article or an essay than what the headline says. What this essay says is scientific. Oh, and I might remind you that a few posts back you insisted the word you were objecting to was not just but all (except that you were the only one to use that word). Share wrote: The use of the word *just* in Rich People Just Care Less. IMO it implies this: Rich People Just Care Less and that's all there is to it. For one thing, it's not scientific at all. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 10:54 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Share wrote: Emily, IMO it's not just a title. It's a catchy phrase that will stick with people even as they forget the article. Why shouldn't it stick with people? As I said earlier, it isn't just somebody's idle generalization. It's been documented by research. I liked the last 5 paragraphs which expressed hope about people becoming friendly with one another and then ceasing to put negative spins on each other's actions and beliefs. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 8:59 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ooops, that's will not allow.or maybe she will. Share, did you like this article by Daniel Goleman, expert that he is on emotional intelligence? What about the article resonated with you? Is the only comment you have that you don't like the title? Dig deep now. :) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Share, desperate to save face and have the last word in her fight with herself, still cannot and will allow herself to comprehend the article as it was written. Since the 1970s, the gap between the rich and everyone else has skyrocketed. Income inequality is at its highest level in a century. This widening gulf between the haves and have-less troubles me, but not for the obvious reasons. Apart from the financial inequities, I fear the expansion of an entirely different gap, caused by the inability to see oneself in a less advantaged person’s shoes. Reducing the economic gap may be impossible without also addressing the gap in empathy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Buck, I've protested to Daniel Goleman about headline Rich People Just Care Less, asking if it was written by an editor who wants to sell more papers and thus get rich! Meanwhile, may there be peace between Patanjali and Bagambhrini.
