[FairfieldLife] RE: Two articles best read one after the other

2013-11-09 Thread emptybill
Taken together with license plate readers, the NSA and the militarization of 
the police this is the next step towards Amerika the Awesome. 

 

 Sieg to B. Hussein! If you voted for Him you gotta love him ‘cause he’s our 
Sovereign and our Fuehrer. 

 

 All hail the new Isomorphic Caliphate!
 

 

 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or your 
online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If you have a 
face, they already know everything about you.

http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 

http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 



 


[FairfieldLife] RE: Two articles best read one after the other

2013-11-09 Thread emptybill
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or your 
online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If you have a 
face, they already know everything about you.

http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 

http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 



 


[FairfieldLife] RE: Two articles best read one after the other

2013-11-09 Thread authfriend
From a NYTimes op-ed entitled Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?
 

 In Parliament, a few maverick individuals have raised concerns about civil 
liberties and privacy. When others have mentioned the subject, it’s mostly been 
to accuse The Guardian of damaging national security, rather than to ask 
whether the intelligence agencies have gone too far.
 

 What explains this reaction — so at odds with the response in the United 
States, where Congress is reviewing its oversight arrangements and where 
everyone from President  Obama on down has acknowledged that a  debate is 
necessary, if not overdue...?
 

 Read more:
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/opinion/why-do-brits-accept-surveillance.html?ref=opinion
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/opinion/why-do-brits-accept-surveillance.html?ref=opinion

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or your 
online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If you have a 
face, they already know everything about you.

http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 

http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 






[FairfieldLife] RE: Two articles best read one after the other

2013-11-09 Thread s3raphita
Re British surveillance: for me one of the more worrying trends has been the 
rise in CCTV cameras everywhere. The newer angle is to have CCTV cameras that 
talk back to people. And the novelty was first tried out in my home town of 
Middlesbrough!
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s94Yu_Io1U 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s94Yu_Io1U 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 From a NYTimes op-ed entitled Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?
 

 In Parliament, a few maverick individuals have raised concerns about civil 
liberties and privacy. When others have mentioned the subject, it’s mostly been 
to accuse The Guardian of damaging national security, rather than to ask 
whether the intelligence agencies have gone too far.
 

 What explains this reaction — so at odds with the response in the United 
States, where Congress is reviewing its oversight arrangements and where 
everyone from President  Obama on down has acknowledged that a  debate is 
necessary, if not overdue...?
 

 Read more:
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/opinion/why-do-brits-accept-surveillance.html?ref=opinion
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/opinion/why-do-brits-accept-surveillance.html?ref=opinion

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or your 
online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If you have a 
face, they already know everything about you.

http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 

http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 





 


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Two articles best read one after the other

2013-11-09 Thread Bhairitu
And just who were the people supposed to vote for?  Bomb, bomb Iran 
McCain and his Caribou Barbee?  Or Tweedledum Romney?  We weren't given 
much choice were we?  You gotta know by now elections are rigged 
anymore.  Your real enemy is corporate America (go ask Alex Jones about 
that).  Go look up Neo-Liberalism (rhymes with Fascism).  That's been 
the game for awhile.


The real problem? American apathy.  What do you know about your local 
candidates who run for office?  If you complain, why don't you run for 
office?


On 11/09/2013 05:57 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:


Taken together with license plate readers, the NSA and the 
militarization of the police this is the next step towards Amerika the 
Awesome.



Sieg to B. Hussein! If you voted for */Him/* you gottalove him ‘cause 
he’s our Sovereign and our Fuehrer.



All hail the new Isomorphic Caliphate!






---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or 
your online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If 
you have a face, they already know everything about you.


http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr 



http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi







[FairfieldLife] RE: Two articles best read one after the other

2013-11-09 Thread s3raphita
And just who were the people supposed to vote for?:  
 

 They were offered the choice of the Natural Law Party at one time. I think if 
people do vote they should always choose a fringe candidate - communist, 
fascist, libertarian, laissez-faire capitalist, Trotskyist, . . .  anything 
that takes your fancy *except* the mainstream parties. Voting for Democrats or 
Republicans (or Conservatives, Labour or Liberal Democrats in the UK) just 
encourages the bastards and allows them to claim they legitimately represent 
the nation. If the Natural Law Party still fielded candidates I'd seriously 
consider voting for them.
 

 There's also the option of direct action - squatting unoccupied properties; 
buying smuggled (so tax-free) cigarettes; putting LSD in the water supply (just 
joking!) . . . 
 

 If there were to be a law that said a candidate for political office had to 
poll more than a fixed minimum percentage of the votes cast (say 30 per cent) 
and if they failed to reach that minimum they couldn't become a representative 
even if they had the largest share of the votes AND more people started to 
either not bother voting or to always vote for a fringe group (or an 
independent, non-affiliated politician) then certain constituencies would find 
themselves unrepresented. But that would at least embarrass the main parties 
and compel them to listen to the concerns of Joe Public.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:

 And just who were the people supposed to vote for?  Bomb, bomb Iran McCain and 
his Caribou Barbee?  Or Tweedledum Romney?  We weren't given much choice were 
we?  You gotta know by now elections are rigged anymore.  Your real enemy is 
corporate America (go ask Alex Jones about that).  Go look up Neo-Liberalism 
(rhymes with Fascism).  That's been the game for awhile.
 
 The real problem? American apathy.  What do you know about your local 
candidates who run for office?  If you complain, why don't you run for office?
 
 On 11/09/2013 05:57 AM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
   
 Taken together with license plate readers, the NSA and the militarization of 
the police this is the next step towards Amerika the Awesome. 
 
 
 
 Sieg to B. Hussein! If you voted for Him you gotta love him ‘cause he’s our 
Sovereign and our Fuehrer. 
 
 
 
 All hail the new Isomorphic Caliphate!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or your 
online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If you have a 
face, they already know everything about you.
 
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIRutm_medium=social_mediautm_campaign=tumblr
 
 
 http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi