--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
How do you know this is impossible, Judy, if you haven't
tried
it?
Judy:
Oh, for heaven's sake, of course I've tried
Judy:
I plan to let it happen whenever it's
ready to happen.
Rory:
How will you know when it is ready to happen?
I won't know until it happens.
How are you going to let it happen if you won't know until it
happens?
Who do you think is going to do this for you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy:
And what on
earth leads you to think that it's something
you *make*?
Rory:
If not you, then who?
Emphasis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy:
And what on
earth leads you to think that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy:
And what on
earth leads you to think that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
How do you know this is impossible, Judy, if you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My only criterion, for instance, is not to
be overshadowed.
Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, I just don't want to be
oveshadowed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be
able to hold all that in the awake mind.
akasha_108 wrote:
Then it must be possible to be able to
hold all that in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory wrote:
Right; no real difference between ignorance and enlightenment,
or
between being asleep and being awake -- though oddly
enough,
as
we have seen, only the experientially awake appear generally
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is
On 9/27/05 12:51 AM, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
into what always is, has
always been, and always will be, the (non)radiant emptifulness of
(not)self itself...
Ah, you took that Simuladvaita class. Was it good?
ROFLOL!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
What's amusing is the idea that the citation of
a particular person's thoughts is always a
manifestation of the authority thing, as if it
could only be an attempt to trump other thoughts.
The real amusement is that you are saying this.
I recall you to be one of the core quoting parrots of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy:
Well, that could be the last experience you need to
have to wake up, no?
Depends on what you mean by wake up. In general one gains the
View, the living, breathing experience and certainty as to what the
state of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, eptfnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's amusing is the idea that the citation of
a particular person's thoughts is always a
manifestation of the authority thing, as if it
could only be an attempt to trump other thoughts.
The real amusement is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
May I suggest, that while you brought up the phrase in your post,
that the phrase can also transcend your own particular situation.
And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
May I suggest, that while you brought up the phrase in your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My only criterion, for instance, is not to
be overshadowed.
Akasha108 writes:
Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, I just don't want to be
oveshadowed gets funnier and funnier the more it is contemplated and
considered. Its like a perfect jeweled Russian
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
Tom T:
no difference
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I think you're suggesting that it's something of
an infinite regress, that one can be overshadowed by
the desire not to be overshadowed. But that's the
nature of the beast, part of why ignorance is so
sticky.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/05 9:38 AM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/05 10:52 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akasha:
I rather look directly into the projector from 3 away.
Rory:
That explains a lot :-)
When you are the screen, you can drink life from a firehose.
Akasha Sutras VI:23:07
Yahoo!
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
Tom T:
no difference
You've forgotten what it's like to be in
ignorance.
On 9/27/05 2:15 PM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
Tom T:
no
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
Tom T:
no difference
Judy writes;
You've forgotten what it's like to be in
ignorance.
Tom T:
Actually I have not forgotten but I can no longer ignore what is
really going on.
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
Tom T:
no difference
Judy writes;
You've forgotten what it's like to
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
Tom T:
no difference
You've forgotten what it's like to be ignorant.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tom T writes:
No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to
be
able to hold all that in the awake mind.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
know what it's like to be ignorant, in other words.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/05 2:15 PM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's like to be realized; I do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, yes! it must be enlightenment - I-I understand all [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;-) Amazing
Yup. But at the same time, it's not the kinda
conversation you necessarily want to add your
name to in the list of credits.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy writes:
I don't know what it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Especially from somebody who admits he isn't
enlightened.
But I lie. Don't you remember? :-)
Yup. You said I had lied when I said
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh, yes! it must be enlightenment - I-I understand all [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;-) Amazing
Yup. But at the same time, it's not the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Especially from somebody who admits he isn't
enlightened.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Don't take this all so seriously, Judy.
I don't know about these other guys,
but I'm just majorly amused tonight at
you pretending not to be enlightened,
and striving so hard to keep up the
pretense.
You keep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Don't take this all so seriously, Judy.
I don't know about these other guys,
but I'm just majorly amused tonight at
you pretending
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK. I think you're suggesting that it's something of
an infinite regress, that one can be overshadowed by
the desire not to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Don't take this all so seriously, Judy.
I don't know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK. I think you're suggesting that it's something of
an infinite regress, that one can be overshadowed by
the desire not to be overshadowed. But that's the
nature of the beast, part of why ignorance is so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So long as we do *not* appreciate *this*
moment as a god-given gift we have not yet fully unwrapped and
understood -- that long do we find it to be shrouded in darkness,
ignorance, fear, suffering, and so on: the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So long as we do *not* appreciate *this*
moment as a god-given gift we have not yet fully unwrapped and
understood -- that long do we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So long as we do *not* appreciate *this*
moment as a
Rory:
How do you know this is impossible, Judy, if you haven't tried
it?
Judy:
Oh, for heaven's sake, of course I've tried it.
Rory:
Yes? With whom? I hope you had company. Most people find it far
easier and more effective the first few times if they are
accompanied by a guide, rebirther
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, by the way, all those wonderful works that you cite above?
Your local Catholic Church has been doing that in your very own
neighbourhood for the past several hundred years...and without the
hugging and the
On 9/26/05 9:40 AM, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, by the way, all those wonderful works that you cite above?
Your local Catholic Church has been doing that in your very own
neighbourhood for the
on 9/25/05 11:34 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/25/05 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't Amma's org have financial statements?
Probably does. I don't know anything about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, by the way, all those wonderful works that you cite above?
Your local Catholic Church has been doing that in your very own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/05 9:40 AM, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, by the way, all those wonderful works that you cite above?
Your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These nuns were like tireless angels.
Despite all the bad press the Catholic church has received in
recent years,
they still carry on an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These nuns were like tireless angels.
Despite all the bad
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9/25/05 11:34 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 9/25/05 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't
TorquoiseB writes:
I think I picked it up in New York. It always
seemed to capture the Zen of certain paradoxes
for me, like the one you cite above. The coex-
istence of seeming opposites, the irresolvability
of the paradox, and all that. It's like how a
Zen master from the Bronx should talk:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquoiseB writes:
I think I picked it up in New York. It always
seemed to capture the Zen of certain paradoxes
for me, like the one you cite above. The coex-
istence of seeming opposites, the
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo!
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Um, I was
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Judy:
Um, I was invoking Nagarjuna.
TomT:
OK explain please. What has that to do with all possibilities.
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Judy:
--How about Brahman is the Absolute AS the relative?
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at
Judy responds:
The bottom line being that there is nothing that
can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
of which the opposite is not also the case,
because Brahman is One without a second.
All possibilities is one way of putting it, but
it doesn't quite convey how radical the Advaita
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--How about Brahman is the Absolute AS the relative?
You'd have to ask Nagarjuna. ;-)
I suspect it would come under ...not both the
relative and the Absolute, though.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy responds:
The bottom line being that there is nothing that
can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
of which the opposite is not also the case,
because Brahman is One without a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy responds:
The bottom line being that there is nothing that
can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
of which the opposite is not also the case,
because Brahman is One without a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy responds:
The bottom line being that there is nothing that
can be said about Brahman, positive or negative,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
[Akasha108 wrote:]
Tom T writes:
No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be able
to hold all that in the awake mind.
Then it must be possible to be able to
hold all that in the unawake
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom T writes:
No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be able
to hold all that in the awake mind.
Then it must be possible to be
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Huh?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of the above...
Tom T:
Which part of all possibilities isn't clear?
Judy:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
[Akasha108 wrote:]
Tom T writes:
No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be
able
to hold all that in the awake
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Let's say we don't get attached. Let's say we've
never *been* attached. Let's say human beans have
always been realized.
How
Rory wrote:
Right; no real difference between ignorance and enlightenment,
or
between being asleep and being awake -- though oddly enough,
as
we have seen, only the experientially awake appear generally
able
to appreciate this to any visceral extent, while the self-
diagnosed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My only criterion, for instance, is not to
be overshadowed.
Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, I just don't want to be
oveshadowed gets funnier and funnier the more it is contemplated and
considered. Its like a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Let's say we don't get attached. Let's say we've
Tom T writes:
No matter how radical that all sounds it is possible to be
able to hold all that in the awake mind.
akasha_108 wrote:
Then it must be possible to be able to
hold all that in the unawake mind too. All Possibilities.
Rory wrote:
Right; no real difference
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My only criterion, for instance, is not to
be overshadowed.
Thinking about that thought, paraphrasing, I just don't want to be
oveshadowed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom T writes:
It is both, it is either and it is neither all at the same
time. Tom
Judy writes:
Or none of
87 matches
Mail list logo