--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm still not clear as to whether you are judging
how well the person is following his/her own internal
ethics, or whether the person is following
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm still not clear as to whether you are judging
how well the person is following
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm still
On Feb 6, 2006, at 7:36 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:If only 50% of them turn out to be correct, then you could achieve the same result by flipping a coin. And if very, very, very *few* of one's intuitive announcements, plans, and pronouncements ever turn out to be correct (as almost anyone sane has to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm still not clear as to whether you are judging
how well the person is following his/her own internal
ethics, or whether the person is following
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm still not clear as to whether you are judging
how well the person is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm still
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I think MMY's definition of mistakes in this context is that
which
prevents or slows further growth towards higher states of
consciousness, not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I think MMY's definition of mistakes in this context is that
which
That works too, just doesn't have anything to do with ethical
or moral 'mistakes'. I mean no'thing' can or does overshadow
the Self, you just don't know that until you know that ;-)
Excellent point. The Self has *never* been overshadowed.
There was never any 'progress' to be made
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That works too, just doesn't have anything to do with ethical
or moral 'mistakes'. I mean no'thing' can or does overshadow
the Self, you just don't know that until you know that ;-)
Excellent point. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm still not clear as to whether you are judging
how well the person is following his/her own internal
ethics, or whether the person is following *your*
own internal ethics.
I understand. Life's a bitch sometimes,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lacking personal experience, if one has developed it,
one could use one's intuition. And again:
How do you know your intuition has developed
sufficiently to be able to evaluate claims for
a phenomenon that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Lacking personal experience, if one has developed it,
one could use one's intuition. And again:
How do you know your intuition has developed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter sounds like Megalonmania 101. If you're
a megalomaniac, you find a way to make *everything*
about you. That's what he was doing; he wasn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter sounds like Megalonmania 101. If you're
a megalomaniac, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
20 matches
Mail list logo
