[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. to Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: PS Old soul new soul is not really a concept I entertain. But you believe in reincarnation? So, do you believe all souls started out / were created / came into being at the same time? If you believe, some souls, Jivan Atmans, started out earlier, some later, then it also means some souls are older than others. But of course it doesn't mean that older souls are more developed. I replied simply because an attribution to me about it was made. Because somebody wanted to see if you could be dragged into something you have no issue with.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. to navashok haiku included
Hi navashok, by not entertaining old soul new soul concept, I meant I almost never think about it, dwell upon it, though I do believe in reincarnation and have had flashes of previous lives. Which have been very instructive as far as navigating current life, especially with, but not limited to, members of the opposite gender. For example, I am convinced that I was a fumbling philosophy student of Xeno in ancient Greece (-: And I do like your point that older soul doesn't necessarily equate to more evolved soul and will whip this aphorism out the next time someone makes nasty joke about mob hit man or professional wrestler: first time on two legs. Unrelated to topic amateur haiku for sake of posting conservation: Vernal equinox snow falling anyway spring and winter holding hands From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:06 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. to Judy --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: PS Old soul new soul is not really a concept I entertain. But you believe in reincarnation? So, do you believe all souls started out / were created / came into being at the same time? If you believe, some souls, Jivan Atmans, started out earlier, some later, then it also means some souls are older than others. But of course it doesn't mean that older souls are more developed. I replied simply because an attribution to me about it was made. Because somebody wanted to see if you could be dragged into something you have no issue with.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. to Judy
Right, only hard for me to grasp because I wasn't on FFL when Maharishi died. Biblical was, for me at least, a humorous reference to other posts. PS Old soul new soul is not really a concept I entertain. I replied simply because an attribution to me about it was made. From: authfriend authfri...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:31 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: dear Buck, I find I cannot quite grasp what is meant by extraordinary times of community need in the FFL context. Did such times occur in the past? Posting limits were lifted (for a couple weeks, as I recall) when Maharishi died. Not too hard to grasp, I don't think. Something biblical perhaps? Biblical?? Who would determine that such times were upon us? Rick, of course. And could such determination be made without undue pressure on any one individual? Speak! I have no idea what that means. Maybe Buck will. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:23 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error on the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I sent it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him slide. Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. Sincerely, -Buck
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error on the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I sent it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him slide. Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. Sincerely, -Buck --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: (snip) And it's good to see you here. Clearly the post count mechanism screwed up, because by my manual count you only made 50 posts. No, I'm sure something much more nefarious is afoot involving unfairness to the whole group which is only protected by Judy's vigilance. It couldn't be the correction of a simple mistake. Usually (as Curtis knows) Alex lets us know if there has been a mistake, especially when the mistake has put a poster at over 50 and Alex has previously announced that they'll be out for the next week. Also note my wording, ignored by Curtis: Has Curtis received some special dispensation, *or what*? (emphasis added)
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error on the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I sent it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him slide. Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. Sincerely, -Buck Buck, the next time you're in church, hootin'n'hollerin' in praise and writhing on the ground, filled with the Holy Spirit, be extra thankful to the Lawd that I'm not the owner of this here Yahoo thingamahoozitz, because if I were, my first official act would be to do away with the posting limits. Sincerely, -Alex P.S. It was nice seeing you today at Revs.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count.
dear Buck, I find I cannot quite grasp what is meant by extraordinary times of community need in the FFL context. Did such times occur in the past? Something biblical perhaps? Who would determine that such times were upon us? And could such determination be made without undue pressure on any one individual? Speak! From: Buck dhamiltony...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:23 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error on the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I sent it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him slide. Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. Sincerely, -Buck --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: (snip) And it's good to see you here. Clearly the post count mechanism screwed up, because by my manual count you only made 50 posts. No, I'm sure something much more nefarious is afoot involving unfairness to the whole group which is only protected by Judy's vigilance. It couldn't be the correction of a simple mistake. Usually (as Curtis knows) Alex lets us know if there has been a mistake, especially when the mistake has put a poster at over 50 and Alex has previously announced that they'll be out for the next week. Also note my wording, ignored by Curtis: Has Curtis received some special dispensation, *or what*? (emphasis added)
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: dear Buck, I find I cannot quite grasp what is meant by extraordinary times of community need in the FFL context. Did such times occur in the past? Posting limits were lifted (for a couple weeks, as I recall) when Maharishi died. Not too hard to grasp, I don't think. Something biblical perhaps? Biblical?? Who would determine that such times were upon us? Rick, of course. And could such determination be made without undue pressure on any one individual? Speak! I have no idea what that means. Maybe Buck will. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:23 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error on the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I sent it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him slide. Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. Sincerely, -Buck
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status
`yes'= Meditator posting status. Posters: 99 `Yes' = meditators Fairfield Life Post Counter, Meditator Status: 50 authfriend jstein@ `Yes' 50 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 45 Vaj vajradhatu@ `Yes' 44 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 32 grate.swan no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 31 Bhairitu noozguru@ 29 sparaig LEnglish5@ 27 ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com 27 Richard J. Williams willytex@ `yes' 24 Robert babajii...@... 22 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 22 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ 21 enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 20 Rick Archer rick@ `Yes' 20 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.com 18 do.rflex do.rflex@ 17 bob_brigante no_re...@yahoogroups.com 16 Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ `Yes' 15 BillyG. wgm4u@ 13 Richard M compost1uk@ `Yes' 12 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 'Yes' 10 satvadude108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 10 raunchydog raunchydog@ 10 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ 9 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com 8 WLeed3@ 8 Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 7 geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 3 drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@ 3 William108 william108wm@ 3 Dick Richardson somerset_2@ `Yes' 3 Dick Mays dickmays@ `Yes' 3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ 2 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 scienceofabundance no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 beno beno mynameisbeno@ 2 Tom azgrey@ 2 Marek Reavis reavismarek@ 2 Hugo richardhughes103@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 tkrystofiak krysto@ 1 pranamoocher bhrma@ 1 nelson lafrancis nelsonriddle2001@ 1 metoostill metoostill@ 1 Peter drpetersutphen@ 1 Paul Mason premanandpaul@ 1 Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 1 Mike Doughney mike@ 1 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ 1 Joe Smith msilver1951@ 1 Barbara Thomas barbara_thomas73@ 1 min.pige min.pige@ 1 wayback71 waybac...@... 1 jyouells2000 john_youe...@... 1 shukra69 shukra69@ 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ `Yes' 1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ 1 John jr_esq@ `Yes' 1 enpai en...@... 2 Jason jedi_sp...@... 2 tomwalsh23 tomwals...@... 2 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... 3 kaladevi93 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 Stu buttspli...@... 6 Ben brbenjaminass...@... 1 kuldip jhala kulls2...@... 1 ve...@... 1 ultrarishi no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2...@... 1 horashastra ve...@... 1 feste37 fest...@... 1 emptybill emptyb...@... 1 wle...@... yes' 1 Dick Mays dickm...@... 1 Devanath Saraswati devna...@... 1 uns_tressor uns_tres...@... 1 jimjim5886 jimjim5...@... 1 Darrylle darryst...@... 1 Thomas Walsh tomwals...@... 1 ffl...@... `yes' 1 bhawani_shank2000 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 jim_falkenstern jimfalkenst...@... `yes'=meditator 1 at_man_and_brahman at_man_and_brah...@... 1 curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@... 4 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... 4 I am the eternal l.shad...@... 1 gullible fool ffl...@... 1 vedamer...@... 3 metoostill metoost...@... 1 alex52556 alex.at.52...@... 1 Randy Meltzer rm...@... 1 claudiouk claudi...@... Posters: 99 Don't meditate? At all? Not close. Sorry. Turq's list of FFL's TMer writers. list of people who (to the best of my knowledge) have both: 1) identified themselves as regular practitioners of the TM technique and *only* the TM technique for many years, and 2) have consist- ently supported the claims made *about* TM and its supposed benefits by Maharishi and the TM organization and encouraged others to practice it. That list consisted of: shukra69 authfriend (Judy Stein) off_world_beings nablusoss1008 WillyTex (Richard Williams) bill_hicks_ride (It's just a ride) babajii_99 (Robert) shempmcgurk bob_brigante wgm4u (BillyG) jr_esq (John) Raunchydog of what long-term practice of the TM technique produces, and as a measure with which to judge whether it delivers on its claimed benefits. My apologies for leaving her off the list earlier, but I wasn't sure that she had claimed in the past to have been a regular practitioner of TM for many years. Now that she has complained about being left off the list and proudly wants to be, I oblige. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/223166 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/223166 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@... wrote: Fairfield Life Post Counter === Start Date (UTC): Sat Jul 25 00:00:00 2009 End Date (UTC): Sat Aug 01 00:00:00 2009 586 messages as of (UTC) Fri Jul 31 19:56:16 2009 50 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 50 authfriend jst...@... 48 shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... 44 WillyTex no_re...@yahoogroups.com 41 Vaj vajradh...@... 41 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com 40 do.rflex do.rf...@... 28 raunchydog raunchy...@... 27
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote: yes 1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ Thanks, That is decisive. outing people as meditators? No, you misinterpret this. No, these are not outings in the sense of that word the way some might use it. Is simply a compiling in to a status list of those admitted meditator FFL'ers. Those who have published thus here as writers saying publicly that they are practicing meditators. Consequently, by what was publicly published before the list is known. For instance, there are some few noteworthy real names of folks we all have known in the past as meditators who have not confirmed in recent memory that they are still meditate; hence, they simply have not been upgraded as `yes'=meditator yet in the listing. Of course they may be meditators still or they may be, as Nabby would point out, quitters. Can't say. Have a nice day. I'm on now the Raja program for meditation this morning. Jai Guru Dev, -D in FF this survey is creepy. Naw, practically I find knowing the meditator status of writers here to be quite useful. You know, it helps in setting the spam filter accordingly. On the one hand, the many thoughtful postings of FFL meditators do come right through. On the other hand if a non-meditator might write something useful, when that happens it often subsequently will get picked up by some real meditators of FFL and occasionally that might become a thread worthwhile to check out. Hence it all very innocently, naturally and simply works a very effective editing of the list. hey, the spam filter usually takes care of most all that Judy/Barry personal stuff sending it directly over to spam delete file. Is highly effective that way. In the end it all does work great towards a higher quality list in simply knowing better where people are honestly coming from. A simple Meditator non-meditator sorting that weights the writing on FFL. Is that so threatening? Are you a meditator? Om, it's a pretty simple question. Jai Guru Dev, -Doug in FF posting status. Posters: 100 `Yes' = meditators Fairfield Life Post Counter, Meditator Status: 50 authfriend jstein@ `Yes' 50 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 45 Vaj vajradhatu@ `Yes' 44 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 32 grate.swan no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 31 Bhairitu noozguru@ 29 sparaig LEnglish5@ 27 ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 27 Richard J. Williams willytex@ `yes' 24 Robert babajii_99@ 22 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 22 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ 21 enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 20 Rick Archer rick@ `Yes' 20 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 18 do.rflex do.rflex@ 17 bob_brigante no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 16 Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ `Yes' 15 BillyG. wgm4u@ 13 Richard M compost1uk@ `Yes' 12 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 'Yes' 10 satvadude108 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 10 raunchydog raunchydog@ 10 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ 9 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 8 WLeed3@ 8 Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 7 geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 3 drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@ 3 William108 william108wm@ 3 Dick Richardson somerset_2@ `Yes' 3 Dick Mays dickmays@ `Yes' 3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ 2 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 2 scienceofabundance no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 2 beno beno mynameisbeno@ 2 Tom azgrey@ 2 Marek Reavis reavismarek@ 2 Hugo richardhughes103@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 tkrystofiak krysto@ 1 pranamoocher bhrma@ 1 nelson lafrancis nelsonriddle2001@ 1 metoostill metoostill@ 1 Peter drpetersutphen@ 1 Paul Mason premanandpaul@ 1 Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 1 Mike Doughney mike@ 1 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ 1 Joe Smith msilver1951@ 1 Barbara Thomas barbara_thomas73@ 1 min.pige min.pige@ 1 wayback71 wayback71@ 1 jyouells2000 john_youells@ 1 shukra69 shukra69@ 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ 1 'Yes' Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ 1 John jr_esq@ `Yes' 1 enpai enpai@ 2 Jason jedi_spock@ 2
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status
outing people as meditators? No, you misinterpret this. No, these are not outings in the sense of that word the way some might use it. Is simply a compiling in to a status list of those admitted meditator FFL'ers. Those who have published thus here as writers saying publicly that they are practicing meditators. Consequently, by what was publicly published before the list is known. For instance, there are some few noteworthy real names of folks we all have known in the past as meditators who have not confirmed in recent memory that they are still meditate; hence, they simply have not been upgraded as `yes'=meditator yet in the listing. Of course they may be meditators still or they may be, as Nabby would point out, quitters. Can't say. Have a nice day. I'm on now the Raja program for meditation this morning. Jai Guru Dev, -D in FF this survey is creepy. Naw, practically I find knowing the meditator status of writers here to be quite useful. You know, it helps in setting the spam filter accordingly. On the one hand, the many thoughtful postings of FFL meditators do come right through. On the other hand if a non-meditator might write something useful, when that happens it often subsequently will get picked up by some real meditators of FFL and occasionally that might become a thread worthwhile to check out. Hence it all very innocently, naturally and simply works a very effective editing of the list. hey, the spam filter usually takes care of most all that Judy/Barry personal stuff sending it directly over to spam delete file. Is highly effective that way. In the end it all does work great towards a higher quality list in simply knowing better where people are honestly coming from. A simple Meditator non-meditator sorting that weights the writing on FFL. Is that so threatening? Are you a meditator? Om, it's a pretty simple question. Jai Guru Dev, -Doug in FF posting status. Posters: 99 `Yes' = meditators Fairfield Life Post Counter, Meditator Status: 50 authfriend jstein@ `Yes' 50 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 45 Vaj vajradhatu@ `Yes' 44 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 32 grate.swan no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 31 Bhairitu noozguru@ 29 sparaig LEnglish5@ 27 ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com 27 Richard J. Williams willytex@ `yes' 24 Robert babajii_99@ 22 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 22 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ 21 enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 20 Rick Archer rick@ `Yes' 20 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.com 18 do.rflex do.rflex@ 17 bob_brigante no_re...@yahoogroups.com 16 Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ `Yes' 15 BillyG. wgm4u@ 13 Richard M compost1uk@ `Yes' 12 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 'Yes' 10 satvadude108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 10 raunchydog raunchydog@ 10 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ 9 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com 8 WLeed3@ 8 Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 7 geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 3 drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@ 3 William108 william108wm@ 3 Dick Richardson somerset_2@ `Yes' 3 Dick Mays dickmays@ `Yes' 3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ 2 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 scienceofabundance no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 beno beno mynameisbeno@ 2 Tom azgrey@ 2 Marek Reavis reavismarek@ 2 Hugo richardhughes103@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 tkrystofiak krysto@ 1 pranamoocher bhrma@ 1 nelson lafrancis nelsonriddle2001@ 1 metoostill metoostill@ 1 Peter drpetersutphen@ 1 Paul Mason premanandpaul@ 1 Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 1 Mike Doughney mike@ 1 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ 1 Joe Smith msilver1951@ 1 Barbara Thomas barbara_thomas73@ 1 min.pige min.pige@ 1 wayback71 wayback71@ 1 jyouells2000 john_youells@ 1 shukra69 shukra69@ 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ 1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ 1 John jr_esq@ `Yes' 1 enpai enpai@ 2 Jason jedi_spock@ 2 tomwalsh23 tomwalsh23@ 2 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ 3 kaladevi93 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 Stu buttsplicer@ 6 Ben brbenjaminassisi@ 1 kuldip jhala kulls2005@ 1 ve-da@ 1 ultrarishi no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ 1 horashastra ve-da@ 1 feste37 feste37@ 1 emptybill emptybill@ 1 WLeed3@ yes' 1 Dick Mays dickmays@ 1 Devanath Saraswati devnath9@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 jimjim5886 jimjim5886@ 1 Darrylle darrystaff@ 1 Thomas Walsh tomwalsh23@ 1 fflmod@ `yes' 1 bhawani_shank2000 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 jim_falkenstern jimfalkenstern@ `yes'=meditator 1 at_man_and_brahman at_man_and_brahman@ 1 curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 4 It's just a ride
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status
yes 1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ 2009/6/10 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony...@yahoo.com outing people as meditators? No, you misinterpret this. No, these are not outings in the sense of that word the way some might use it. Is simply a compiling in to a status list of those admitted meditator FFL'ers. Those who have published thus here as writers saying publicly that they are practicing meditators. Consequently, by what was publicly published before the list is known. For instance, there are some few noteworthy real names of folks we all have known in the past as meditators who have not confirmed in recent memory that they are still meditate; hence, they simply have not been upgraded as `yes'=meditator yet in the listing. Of course they may be meditators still or they may be, as Nabby would point out, quitters. Can't say. Have a nice day. I'm on now the Raja program for meditation this morning. Jai Guru Dev, -D in FF this survey is creepy. Naw, practically I find knowing the meditator status of writers here to be quite useful. You know, it helps in setting the spam filter accordingly. On the one hand, the many thoughtful postings of FFL meditators do come right through. On the other hand if a non-meditator might write something useful, when that happens it often subsequently will get picked up by some real meditators of FFL and occasionally that might become a thread worthwhile to check out. Hence it all very innocently, naturally and simply works a very effective editing of the list. hey, the spam filter usually takes care of most all that Judy/Barry personal stuff sending it directly over to spam delete file. Is highly effective that way. In the end it all does work great towards a higher quality list in simply knowing better where people are honestly coming from. A simple Meditator non-meditator sorting that weights the writing on FFL. Is that so threatening? Are you a meditator? Om, it's a pretty simple question. Jai Guru Dev, -Doug in FF posting status. Posters: 99 `Yes' = meditators Fairfield Life Post Counter, Meditator Status: 50 authfriend jstein@ `Yes' 50 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 45 Vaj vajradhatu@ `Yes' 44 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 32 grate.swan no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 31 Bhairitu noozguru@ 29 sparaig LEnglish5@ 27 ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 27 Richard J. Williams willytex@ `yes' 24 Robert babajii_99@ 22 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 22 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ 21 enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 20 Rick Archer rick@ `Yes' 20 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 18 do.rflex do.rflex@ 17 bob_brigante no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 16 Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ `Yes' 15 BillyG. wgm4u@ 13 Richard M compost1uk@ `Yes' 12 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 'Yes' 10 satvadude108 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com `Yes' 10 raunchydog raunchydog@ 10 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ 9 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 8 WLeed3@ 8 Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 7 geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 3 drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@ 3 William108 william108wm@ 3 Dick Richardson somerset_2@ `Yes' 3 Dick Mays dickmays@ `Yes' 3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ 2 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 2 scienceofabundance no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com 2 beno beno mynameisbeno@ 2 Tom azgrey@ 2 Marek Reavis reavismarek@ 2 Hugo richardhughes103@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 tkrystofiak krysto@ 1 pranamoocher bhrma@ 1 nelson lafrancis nelsonriddle2001@ 1 metoostill metoostill@ 1 Peter drpetersutphen@ 1 Paul Mason premanandpaul@ 1 Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 1 Mike Doughney mike@ 1 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ 1 Joe Smith msilver1951@ 1 Barbara Thomas barbara_thomas73@ 1 min.pige min.pige@ 1 wayback71 wayback71@ 1 jyouells2000 john_youells@ 1 shukra69 shukra69@ 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ 1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ 1 John jr_esq@ `Yes' 1 enpai enpai@ 2 Jason jedi_spock@ 2 tomwalsh23 tomwalsh23@ 2 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ 3 kaladevi93 no_re...@yahoogroups.com no_reply%40yahoogroups.com 2 Stu buttsplicer@ 6 Ben brbenjaminassisi@ 1 kuldip jhala kulls2005@ 1 ve-da@ 1 ultrarishi
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status
Take me off your fucking yes list and put me in your goddamn spam filter. Prick. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony...@... wrote: this survey is creepy. Naw, practically I find knowing the meditator status of writers here to be quite useful. You know, it helps in setting the spam filter accordingly. On the one hand, the many thoughtful postings of FFL meditators do come right through. On the other hand if a non-meditator might write something useful, when that happens it often subsequently will get picked up by some real meditators of FFL and occasionally that might become a thread worthwhile to check out. Hence it all very innocently, naturally and simply works a very effective editing of the list. hey, the spam filter usually takes care of most all that Judy/Barry personal stuff sending it directly over to spam delete file. Is highly effective that way. In the end it all does work great towards a higher quality list in simply knowing better where people are honestly coming from. A simple Meditator non-meditator sorting that weights the writing on FFL. Is that so threatening? Are you a meditator? Om, it's a pretty simple question. Jai Guru Dev, -Doug in FF posting status. Posters: 99 `Yes' = meditators Fairfield Life Post Counter, Meditator Status: 50 authfriend jstein@ `Yes' 50 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 45 Vaj vajradhatu@ `Yes' 44 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 32 grate.swan no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 31 Bhairitu noozguru@ 29 sparaig LEnglish5@ 27 ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com 27 Richard J. Williams willytex@ `yes' 24 Robert babajii_99@ 22 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 22 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ 21 enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 20 Rick Archer rick@ `Yes' 20 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.com 18 do.rflex do.rflex@ 17 bob_brigante no_re...@yahoogroups.com 16 Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ `Yes' 15 BillyG. wgm4u@ 13 Richard M compost1uk@ `Yes' 12 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 'Yes' 10 satvadude108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com `Yes' 10 raunchydog raunchydog@ 10 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ 9 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com 8 WLeed3@ 8 Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 7 geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 3 drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@ 3 William108 william108wm@ 3 Dick Richardson somerset_2@ `Yes' 3 Dick Mays dickmays@ `Yes' 3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ 2 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 scienceofabundance no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 beno beno mynameisbeno@ 2 Tom azgrey@ 2 Marek Reavis reavismarek@ 2 Hugo richardhughes103@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 tkrystofiak krysto@ 1 pranamoocher bhrma@ 1 nelson lafrancis nelsonriddle2001@ 1 metoostill metoostill@ 1 Peter drpetersutphen@ 1 Paul Mason premanandpaul@ 1 Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 1 Mike Doughney mike@ 1 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ 1 Joe Smith msilver1951@ 1 Barbara Thomas barbara_thomas73@ 1 min.pige min.pige@ 1 wayback71 wayback71@ 1 jyouells2000 john_youells@ 1 shukra69 shukra69@ 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ 1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ 1 John jr_esq@ `Yes' 1 enpai enpai@ 2 Jason jedi_spock@ 2 tomwalsh23 tomwalsh23@ 2 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ 3 kaladevi93 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 Stu buttsplicer@ 6 Ben brbenjaminassisi@ 1 kuldip jhala kulls2005@ 1 ve-da@ 1 ultrarishi no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@ 1 horashastra ve-da@ 1 feste37 feste37@ 1 emptybill emptybill@ 1 WLeed3@ yes' 1 Dick Mays dickmays@ 1 Devanath Saraswati devnath9@ 1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@ 1 jimjim5886 jimjim5886@ 1 Darrylle darrystaff@ 1 Thomas Walsh tomwalsh23@ 1 fflmod@ `yes' 1 bhawani_shank2000 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 jim_falkenstern jimfalkenstern@ `yes'=meditator 1 at_man_and_brahman at_man_and_brahman@ 1 curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 4 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ 4 I am the eternal L.Shaddai@ 1 gullible fool fflmod@ 1 vedamerlin@ 3 metoostill metoostill@ 1 alex52556 alex.at.52556@ 1 Randy Meltzer rm108@ 1 claudiouk claudiouk@ Posters: 99
[FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony...@... wrote: this survey is creepy. Naw, practically I find knowing the meditator status of writers here to be quite useful. You know, it helps in setting the spam filter accordingly. I've got news for you that will make your list real simple: Vaj is the only non-meditator on FFL. Fact. Offworld
