From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big
Not for all the tea in China.
From: dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:27 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
Theevident Science would tell us though
more.
From: lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:58 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions
, November 26, 2014 2:32 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: salyavin808 no_re
*From:* salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical
discussions, been a big numbers effect that requires statistical
analysis to catch.
It's rubbish in other words.
On
On 11/26/2014 1:32 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
This is clever, he can prove there are paranormal powers without
anyone ever demonstrating any such thing! A first for science, makes
me wonder why his institute isn't taken seriously..
Lies, damn lies, statistics etc..
You are another informant
That's great Barry, but inquiring minds want to know if that ranks higher or
lower than having your 20 year effort pay off by finally getting a comment by
Doug Hamilton posted on some obscure online zine.
But really, I'm happy for you.
A real feather in your cap.
And an odd twist on
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical
discussions, been a big numbers effect that requires statistical
analysis to catch.
By theory, a town the size of Fairfield would be too small to really
see the effect manifest
26, 2014 12:27 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
The evident Science would tell us though that hands down the bestest
chance we have to support and give peace between peoples, and
religions for instance, is cultivating the practice of a transcending
meditation
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical
discussions, been a big numbers effect that requires statistical
analysis to catch.
On 11/26/2014 1:32 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
It's rubbish in other words.
Rubbish is
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big numbers effect that requires
Barry seems quite obsessed with this idea of wanting fame, and has been
projecting his desire onto others as long as he has been posting here. WTF? He
can *have* my supposed 15 minutes, as can anyone else.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :
---In
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :
Barry seems quite obsessed with this idea of wanting fame, and has been
projecting his desire onto others as long as he has been posting here. WTF? He
can *have* my supposed 15 minutes, as can anyone else.
Yuppers,
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield and M. Effect
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions,
been a big numbers effect that requires statistical analysis to catch.
By theory, a town the size of Fairfield would be too small to really see the
effect manifest
Eh...
DC is about the smallest town where teh ME effect could be reliably
demonstrated. And statistical fluctuations in one category of crime like
murder could still be small number issues.
Current Population Demographics and Statistics for Washington DC by age,
gender and race.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
Eh...
DC is about the smallest town where teh ME effect could be reliably
demonstrated. And statistical fluctuations in one category of crime like
murder could still be small number issues.
Funny how the predictions for the
No, no Turq, you missed the point. YOU had the thoughts of butt fucking
babies. Noone else has ever expressed their thoughts in this way on this forum
before you lay open your mind for all to see.
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big numbers effect that requires statistical analysis to catch.
By theory, a town the size of Fairfield would be too small to really see the
effect manifest reliably, regardless of what research beleivers decided
The evident Science would tell us though that hands down the bestest chance we
have to support and give peace between peoples, and religions for instance, is
cultivating the practice of a transcending meditation as spirituality practice.
According to the science, it would be best to see more
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big numbers effect that requires statistical analysis to catch.
It's rubbish in other words.
By theory, a town the size of Fairfield would be
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big numbers effect that requires statistical analysis to catch.
It's
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big numbers effect that requires statistical analysis to catch.
It's rubbish in other words.
I was going to
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
The Maharishi Effect has always, at least in the theoretical discussions, been
a big numbers effect that requires
24 matches
Mail list logo
