--- authfriend wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
Slate's Fred Kaplan explains why and how President
Bush should answer Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's letter.
It's a very good essay, Patrick. It's really
hard to see what Bush could lose by taking Kaplan's
advice.
I like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
Slate's Fred Kaplan explains why and how President
Bush should answer Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's letter.
It's a very good essay, Patrick.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
Slate's Fred Kaplan explains why and how President
Bush should answer Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's letter.
It's a very good essay, Patrick.
Hey, thanks! I wasn't enterprising enough. I'll check them out.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
--- Gillam wrote:
Slate's Fred Kaplan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, thanks! I wasn't enterprising enough. I'll check them out.
Well, I've now read them all, including the blog posts,
and most of them aren't terribly edifying (especially
the newspaper pieces). The best of
--- authfriend wrote:
There may be more interesting stuff in the comments to
the blog posts, but you typically have to wade through
a fair amount of inanity to find the nuggets.
I only looked at the responses to Juan Cole's
Informed Comment blog. These were interesting:
Ran Talbott
Just for the sake of keeping score, here's another
one, from TPM Cafe:
http://matthewyglesias.tpmcafe.com/node/29756#comment
The comment, if the person has their facts straight,
sounds like a good point.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
---
