[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But the read out there is that she didn't fall down and die.  Be 
sure that we won't be hearing from her unscripted for the rest of the 
campaign.

She's a fool but has a nice smile and all the right simple, fundie 
christian views that the americans like. In many ways she reminds me 
of Vaj and the Turq here at FFL; great rethoric and no substance. If 
she is lying also as these two gentlemen remains to be seen.
Don't be surprized if Palin becomes your next president.

I seriously doubt that intelligence and vision will bring anyone into 
the White House in this generation.

Meanwhile the americans should simply get used to being the 
laughingstock of the rest of the world as even their dear capitalism 
they so aggresslivly have exported to much of this planet is falling 
apart.


Now that communism is gone the next to go is capitalism.

- Maharishi 


I am not criticizing anyone. I am telling the people that the world 
has been lived by the individual on a wrong level of knowledge, very 
wrong knowledge. 
And therefore, it is the time now that the night is ending. The dawn 
is dawning.

- Maharishi 



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick 
 jochadw1@ wrote:
 
  But the read out there is that she didn't fall down and die.  Be 
 sure that we won't be hearing from her unscripted for the rest of the 
 campaign.
 
 She's a fool but has a nice smile and all the right simple, fundie 
 christian views that the americans like. 


Oh for gosh tooting, you are so darn right, here Nabs. All of us big
clumsy, lumbering retarded Americans, every single one of us, just
adore superficiality and fundie views.  We all believe dianasours
roamed the earth 6000 years ago, and that, gosh darn it, America would
be justa a gal' darn super place if those darn old regulators and tax
collectors would get out of the way of the all all of the ingenuity
and energy of all us grand and great americans. Ya know, I was happily
surprised a European was bright enough to see this so clearly, gosh
darn it. Gee whilickers, cuz ya know, all the other, every last one of
them, Europeans are godless, with no values, liberals I think they
call 'em, sex-crazed, foreigners. As my neighbor Billy-bob-Johhny-Joe
said when he and his wife Sally-Jean-Madge-Sue-Ellen said when they
went to Europe -- sur has some pretty buildings and all -- but would
be a much nicer place if there weren't all them foreigners around.



 

n many ways she reminds me 
 of Vaj and the Turq here at FFL; great rethoric and no substance. If 
 she is lying also as these two gentlemen remains to be seen.
 Don't be surprized if Palin becomes your next president.
 
 I seriously doubt that intelligence and vision will bring anyone into 
 the White House in this generation.
 
 Meanwhile the americans should simply get used to being the 
 laughingstock of the rest of the world as even their dear capitalism 
 they so aggresslivly have exported to much of this planet is falling 
 apart.
 
 
 Now that communism is gone the next to go is capitalism.
 
 - Maharishi 
 
 
 I am not criticizing anyone. I am telling the people that the world 
 has been lived by the individual on a wrong level of knowledge, very 
 wrong knowledge. 
 And therefore, it is the time now that the night is ending. The dawn 
 is dawning.
 
 - Maharishi





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
pranamoocher wrote:
 Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, 
 while Biden is pointedly making Palin's 
 statements look inaccurate.
 
THE FACTS: Biden voted for 1999 deregulation 
that liberal groups are blaming for part of 
the financial crisis today. The law allowed 
Wall Street investment banks to create the 
kind of mortgage-related securities at the 
core of the problem now. The law was widely 
backed by Republicans as well as by Democratic 
President Clinton, who argues it has stopped 
the crisis today from being worse.

Read more:

'Some facts adrift in veep debate'
By Calvin Woodward
Associated Press, October 3, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/43o4sq 



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 pranamoocher wrote:
  Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, 
  while Biden is pointedly making Palin's 
  statements look inaccurate.
  
 THE FACTS: Biden voted for 1999 deregulation 
 that liberal groups are blaming for part of 
 the financial crisis today. The law allowed 
 Wall Street investment banks to create the 
 kind of mortgage-related securities at the 
 core of the problem now. 

Gee, Solomon Bros and Drexel created these instruments in the 80's --
and the business, as well as the wider derivative business flourished
in the later 80's and 90s. How exactly did the 1999 repeal of
Glass-Steagall Act allow investment banks to begin to create these 
instruments?

By the way, there is nothing fundamentally wrong with derivatives.
They have not caused the crisis. 

What caused the crisis was massive over investment in real estate,
wholesale speculation by small time flippers and individuals trying
to make a quick buck before the market crashed (as everyone knew it
would) -- all fueled by excessive and very cheap money from repeated
Fed interventions -- and the non-enforcement or bending of lending
laws (liar loans etc) -- and lack of due dilligence on the part of
many got-to-buy- NOW home-buyers.

  





The law was widely 
 backed by Republicans as well as by Democratic 
 President Clinton, who argues it has stopped 
 the crisis today from being worse.
 
 Read more:
 
 'Some facts adrift in veep debate'
 By Calvin Woodward
 Associated Press, October 3, 2008
 http://tinyurl.com/43o4sq





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread pranamoocher
Nice link RW- thanks for sharing that article.
I'm forwarding it around.
Amazing how much rhetoric and  falsehoods are bantered about in debates,
usually with the mass herds never hearing or reading the truth.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 pranamoocher wrote:
  Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes,
  while Biden is pointedly making Palin's
  statements look inaccurate.
 
 THE FACTS: Biden voted for 1999 deregulation
 that liberal groups are blaming for part of
 the financial crisis today. The law allowed
 Wall Street investment banks to create the
 kind of mortgage-related securities at the
 core of the problem now. The law was widely
 backed by Republicans as well as by Democratic
 President Clinton, who argues it has stopped
 the crisis today from being worse.

 Read more:

 'Some facts adrift in veep debate'
 By Calvin Woodward
 Associated Press, October 3, 2008
 http://tinyurl.com/43o4sq




[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
pranamoocher wrote:
 Amazing how much rhetoric and  falsehoods 
 are bantered about in debates, usually with 
 the mass herds never hearing or reading the 
 truth...
 
This isn't what's conventionally described 
as a gaffe, and it won't swing any votes, but 
last night Joe Biden garbled the Constitutional 
role of the Vice President.

Read more:

'Biden Mangles the Constitution'
Posted by John Hinderaker
Powerline, October 3, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/3tqoqd



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
new.morning wrote:
 What caused the crisis was massive over 
 investment in real estate, wholesale 
 speculation by small time flippers and 
 individuals trying to make a quick buck 
 before the market crashed (as everyone 
 knew it would) -- all fueled by excessive 
 and very cheap money from repeated Fed 
 interventions -- and the non-enforcement 
 or bending of lending laws (liar loans 
 etc) -- and lack of due dilligence on 
 the part of many got-to-buy- NOW 
 home-buyers.
 
A serious Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reform 
bill was passed by the Senate Banking 
Committee, which gave a regulator full power 
to crack down, giving requiring the 
companies to eliminate their all risky 
investments.

So what happened?

The Democrats in Congress opposed it on 
a party-line vote in the committee, 
signaling that this would be a partisan 
issue. Republicans then couldn't even 
get the Senate to vote on it! 

So, who were the politicians who protected 
Fannie and Freddie? Nancy Pelosi, Harry 
Reid, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and 
Christopher Dodd.

And who has recieved the most political 
contributions? Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, 
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and 
Christopher Dodd.

It's mind-boggling and it's just outrageous. 
These politicians should be made to pay. 
If I was in charge I'd hit them on the 
head really hard in the courts.

Read more:

'How the Democrats Created the Financial 
Crisis'
By Kevin Hassett
Bloomberg, Sept 22, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/445afb



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread off_world_beings

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Jonathan Chadwick
  jochadw1@ wrote:
  
   But the read out there is that she didn't fall down and die.  Be
  sure that we won't be hearing from her unscripted for the rest of
the
  campaign.
 
  She's a fool but has a nice smile and all the right simple, fundie
  christian views that the americans like.


 Oh for gosh tooting, you are so darn right, here Nabs. All of us big
 clumsy, lumbering retarded Americans, every single one of us, just
 adore superficiality and fundie views. 

Even yo dogs is obese and they wear poofy clothes an' lipstick.

We all believe dianasours
 roamed the earth 6000 years ago, and that, gosh darn it, America would
 be justa a gal' darn super place if those darn old regulators and tax
 collectors would get out of the way of the all all of the ingenuity
 and energy of all us grand and great americans. Ya know, I was happily
 surprised a European was bright enough to see this so clearly, gosh
 darn it. Gee whilickers, cuz ya know, all the other, every last one of
 them, Europeans are godless, with no values, liberals I think they
 call 'em, sex-crazed, foreigners. As my neighbor
Billy-bob-Johhny-Joe

Is he related to JimmyJimJimJimJoeBob?

OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread off_world_beings

Lol...Facts from a Neocon who thinks that the world is 6,000 years old
and these are the last days.

OffWorld

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 pranamoocher wrote:
  Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes,
  while Biden is pointedly making Palin's
  statements look inaccurate.
 
 THE FACTS: Biden voted for 1999 deregulation
 that liberal groups are blaming for part of
 the financial crisis today. The law allowed
 Wall Street investment banks to create the
 kind of mortgage-related securities at the
 core of the problem now. The law was widely
 backed by Republicans as well as by Democratic
 President Clinton, who argues it has stopped
 the crisis today from being worse.

 Read more:

 'Some facts adrift in veep debate'
 By Calvin Woodward
 Associated Press, October 3, 2008
 http://tinyurl.com/43o4sq http://tinyurl.com/43o4sq





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
off_world_beings wrote:
 Facts from a Neocon who thinks that 
 the world is 6,000 years old and these 
 are the last days.

Associated Press writers Tom Raum, Steve 
Quinn, Jim Kuhnhenn, Lolita Baldor and 
Matthew Lee contributed to this report. 

None of them, to my knowledge, are 
Neocons who think that the world is 
6,000 years old and these are the last 
days. 

Are you mixed up, or what?

  THE FACTS: Biden voted for 1999 deregulation
  that liberal groups are blaming for part of
  the financial crisis today. The law allowed
  Wall Street investment banks to create the
  kind of mortgage-related securities at the
  core of the problem now. The law was widely
  backed by Republicans as well as by Democratic
  President Clinton, who argues it has stopped
  the crisis today from being worse.
 
  Read more:
 
  'Some facts adrift in veep debate'
  By Calvin Woodward
  Associated Press, October 3, 2008
  http://tinyurl.com/43o4sq 






[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
Bhairitu wrote:
 Contestants from the audience get 
 to debate a sitting Senate. 
 
Almost anyone could debate Joe Biden.
He's been wrong so many times that I
lose count. 

He voted against Gulf War I, which the
U.S. won. Biden voted yes on Gulf War II,
which turned out to be a quagmire. Obama
voted to cut the funding for U.S. troops
fighting the war in Iraq - Biden said that
Obama was wrong. Biden wanted to split
Iraq into three parts, causing a civil
war. Biden was wrong about the Iraq
surge - Biden is wrong, he should retire.
Biden is a negative force for the U.S.
Congress. He can't be trusted to make the
right decisions.

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy 
Center, the McCain proposals would result 
in a net benefit of $1,241 to the average 
taxpayer in 2009, $895 in 2013, and $386 
in 2018. Taxpayers in the top quintile 
would be slightly worse off by 2018, but 
other taxpayers would be slightly ahead. 

Read more:

'Biden Focuses Only on Negatives Of McCain's 
Health-Coverage Plan'
By Michael Dobbs
Washington Post, Friday, October 3, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/4kds9f



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread gullible fool


It was like she was at a cheerleading rally or something.
I swore that if she *winked* one more time I was 
going to throw my slipper at the TV.
Fortunately, the TV survived.
  
The smiling kept annoying me, and the fact that it was in such a serious 
setting is mind-boggling. It reminded me of Carter's smile. 
 
Yesterday, someone on the news said one out of three sitting vice presidents 
becomes president. 
 
Love will swallow you, eat you up completely until there is no `you,' only 
love. 
 
- Amma  

--- On Fri, 10/3/08, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008, 12:20 AM




On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:07 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:



I'm a Republican but Palin is getting ripped apart by Biden in this

debate, who appears much more informed and is debating the issues  


with 

more finesse. Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, while Biden 
is 

pointedly making Palin's statements look inaccurate. 
I wonder how much the VP choice affects voters preferences here? 
I heard on the news today it was the 7th most important issue, so 
perhaps the VP issue won't throw the election. 
Biden wins this one and Palin looks like a beginner.


Yes it looked like an adult having a debate with a three year old. She was all 
rah rah but no substance. 


It was like she was at a cheerleading rally or something.
I swore that if she *winked* one more time I was 
going to throw my slipper at the TV.
Fortunately, the TV survived.


Sal

 



  

[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread John
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
 
  New reality TV show:  Debate a Senator.  Contestants from the  
  audience
  get to debate a sitting Senate.  That's what the VP Debate looked 
like
  last night.   Next up Can You Be President? where randomly 
picked
  people sit in the Oval Office for a day.  Or how about Your 
Financial
  Bailout Plan where audience members submit their bailout plan to
  Congress.   Should be ratings winners for networks.
 
 What finally got to me was the shout-out to some
 3rd grade class.  What is this, debate prep at Wasilla
 High?
 
 One could only imagine McCain cringing...
 
 Sal


One Republican strategist said that Palin played rather well to her 
base supporters.  But Palin did not do anything more to attract the 
uncommitted voters.  In other words, she did fairly well and redeemed 
herself from the Couric interview.





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
Sal wrote:
 What finally got to me was the shout-out 
 to some 3rd grade class.

Well, if you were as smart as a 3rd grader, 
you would have shouted out about Biden's 
big gaffe at the 'Veep' debate. 

So, when was it that France and the U.S. 
kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon? 

When we kicked — along with France, we 
kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and 
Barack said, Move NATO forces in there. 
Fill the vacuum, because if you don't know — 
if you don't, Hezbollah will control it. 
- Sen Joe Biden

Since you didn't shout out, Sal, I'd say 
that you flunked out of this debate. 

He's supposed to be the experienced elder 
statesman Senator Barack Obama chose to help 
him govern and fill in some of his knowledge 
and experience gaps. He's supposed to know 
far more about foreign policy than she does.

Read more:

'Joe Biden's Alternate Universe'
By Michael J. Totten
Commentary Magazine, October, 2008 
http://tinyurl.com/3ess97



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
 willytex@ wrote:
 
  pranamoocher wrote:
   Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, 
   while Biden is pointedly making Palin's 
   statements look inaccurate.
   
  THE FACTS: Biden voted for 1999 deregulation 
  that liberal groups are blaming for part of 
  the financial crisis today. The law allowed 
  Wall Street investment banks to create the 
  kind of mortgage-related securities at the 
  core of the problem now. 
 
 Gee, Solomon Bros and Drexel created these 
 instruments in the 80's --
 and the business, as well as the wider 
 derivative business flourished
 in the later 80's and 90s. How exactly 
 did the 1999 repeal of
 Glass-Steagall Act allow investment 
 banks to begin to create these 
 instruments?
 
 By the way, there is nothing fundamentally 
 wrong with derivatives.
 They have not caused the crisis. 
 
 What caused the crisis was massive over 
 investment in real estate,
 wholesale speculation by small time 
 flippers and individuals trying
 to make a quick buck before the market crashed (as everyone knew it
 would) -- all fueled by excessive and very cheap money from repeated
 Fed interventions -- and the non-enforcement or bending of lending
 laws (liar loans etc) -- and lack of due dilligence on the part of
 many got-to-buy- NOW home-buyers.

In the end, it seems to me that the 
companies involved in these deals 
would recognize the snowball effect 
of having even a small percentage of 
these risky mortgages default, and 
would guard against it. As I understand 
it, the industry created credit default 
swaps as insurance against that unhappy 
eventuality, but the derivatives failed 
to work. Why is that? Why did the 
derivatives fail?

I can't accept that homeowners are to 
blame, or that lack of regulation is 
to blame. A mechanism was invented to 
prevent this problem, and that mechanism 
failed. Isn't it that simple? Undoubtedly
not, but you can see why I'd ask.





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pranamoocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nice link RW- thanks for sharing that article.
 I'm forwarding it around.
 Amazing how much rhetoric and  falsehoods are bantered about in 
debates,
 usually with the mass herds never hearing or reading the truth.

Relax, the masses are not ready for the truth anyway. Never were. 
Foolish as they are the coming meltdown will come as a schock. The 
Masses always tries to take shelter behind the leaders, afraid of ruin. 
Including most contributers here on FFL. Even though we have tried to 
prepare them for the inevitable; Maharishi even said the following 19 
years ago:

Now that communism is gone the next to go is capitalism
- Maharishi

Unfortunately, most of the posters here turned their backs on Maharishi 
decades ago without a clue to His real status and mission. 

In doing so, among other things, they also missed the gravity of the 
present situation.





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread John
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pranamoocher bhrma@ wrote:
 
  Nice link RW- thanks for sharing that article.
  I'm forwarding it around.
  Amazing how much rhetoric and  falsehoods are bantered about in 
 debates,
  usually with the mass herds never hearing or reading the truth.
 
 Relax, the masses are not ready for the truth anyway. Never were. 
 Foolish as they are the coming meltdown will come as a schock. The 
 Masses always tries to take shelter behind the leaders, afraid of 
ruin. 
 Including most contributers here on FFL. Even though we have tried 
to 
 prepare them for the inevitable; Maharishi even said the following 
19 
 years ago:
 
 Now that communism is gone the next to go is capitalism
 - Maharishi
 


Nabby, there are no countries in the world that are strictly using 
capitalism as the economic model.  The USA is a mixed economy and not 
as capitalist as you may think.  I believe MMY misunderstood this 
point as well.

With the passage of the bailout plan, banks in the USA will now be 
regulated more by the government, which is not a capitalist trait.



 Unfortunately, most of the posters here turned their backs on 
Maharishi 
 decades ago without a clue to His real status and mission. 
 
 In doing so, among other things, they also missed the gravity of 
the 
 present situation.





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Patrick Gillam
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool wrote:
  
 Yesterday, someone on the news said one 
 out of three sitting vice presidents 
 becomes president. 

The stats at Wikipedia may be more informative. 

http://tinyurl.com/487q39

It looks as if 14 vice presidents have become 
president, one way or another:

From Wikipedia - 

Nine succeeded to the Presidency

   1. John Tyler became President when William Henry Harrison died.
Initially sought re-election in 1844 as the nominee of the National
Democratic Tyler Convention but withdrew before the election.
   2. Millard Fillmore became President when Zachary Taylor died.
Sought the Whig nomination in 1852, but lost to Winfield Scott. Four
years later, ran and lost as the candidate of the American and Whig
Parties.
   3. Andrew Johnson became President when Abraham Lincoln was
assassinated. Sought the Democratic nomination in 1868, but was
unsuccessful.
   4. Chester A. Arthur became President when James Garfield was
assassinated. Sought a full term, but was not re-nominated.
   5. Theodore Roosevelt became President when William McKinley was
assassinated; then was elected to full term. Did not seek re-election.
Four years after leaving office, ran again and lost.
   6. Calvin Coolidge became President when Warren Harding died; then
was elected to full term. Did not seek re-election.
   7. Harry S. Truman became President when Franklin D. Roosevelt
died; then was elected to full term.
   8. Lyndon B. Johnson became President when John F. Kennedy was
assassinated; then was elected to full term. Did not seek re-election.
   9. Gerald Ford became President when Richard Nixon resigned; then
lost election to full term.

Four sitting Vice Presidents were elected President

   1. John Adams (1789–1797) was elected President in 1796.
   2. Thomas Jefferson (1797–1801) was elected President in 1800.
   3. Martin Van Buren (1833–1837) was elected President in 1836.
   4. George H. W. Bush (1981–1989) was elected President in 1988.

One non-sitting former Vice President was elected President

* Richard Nixon was elected President in 1968. He had been Vice
President to Dwight D. Eisenhower from 1953 to 1961.

http://tinyurl.com/487q39




[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread m2smart4u2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:07 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
 
  I'm a Republican but Palin is getting ripped apart by Biden in 
this
  debate, who appears much more informed and is debating the issues
  with
  more finesse. Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, while 
Biden
  is
  pointedly making Palin's statements look inaccurate.
  I wonder how much the VP choice affects voters preferences here?
  I heard on the news today it was the 7th most important issue, so
  perhaps the VP issue won't throw the election.
  Biden wins this one and Palin looks like a beginner.
 
  Yes it looked like an adult having a debate with a three year 
old.  
  She was all rah rah but no substance.
 
 It was like she was at a cheerleading rally or something.
 I swore that if she *winked* one more time I was
 going to throw my slipper at the TV.
 Fortunately, the TV survived.
 
 Sal

This is for you Sal

Sarah Palin Serial Winker

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/achenblog/2008/10/sarah_palin_serial_
winker.html





[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Richard J. Williams
m2smart4u2000 wrote:
 Sarah Palin Serial Winker
 
It is hard for liberals to be objective, 
honest and rational. If they were, they 
would admit that Palin is better qualified 
than Barak Obama to be President of the 
U.S.

She did a fine job against a seasoned 
opponent. Despite the negative spin, she 
is a capable, executive officer with more 
experience than Barak Obama.

Yes, his name is Barak Obama. Has anyone 
mentioned ACORN and ACORN Housing lately? 
The nuts are about to drop on Obama!

DRUDGE REPORT:

WHO WON THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?

BIDEN 143,360

PALIN 351,930




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:20 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:


It was like she was at a cheerleading rally or something.
I swore that if she *winked* one more time I was
going to throw my slipper at the TV.
Fortunately, the TV survived.

Sal


This is for you Sal

Sarah Palin Serial Winker

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/achenblog/2008/10/ 
sarah_palin_serial_winker.html


Really, there ought to be some kind of jail sentence
for such shameless mugging...

Sal




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread Louis McKenzie
There is no comparison between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin... Really there is 
no comparison between John McCain and Barack Obama.   It is like comparing 
Keith Wallace or David Orme Johnson to a high school biology teacher.   Sarah 
is a good person.  She has a lot of human stuff going on but thats ok everyone 
does.  Yet would I want her to represent me as my president ABSOLUTELY 
NOT..   Would I want John McCain to represent me as my President NO. 
because he does not know how to represent any perspective other than the 
american agenda.   In todays global world we need more than that.   We need 
people who know how to convesre in other languages, who understand the wordl 
banking system and understand what just happened better than McCain, although 
as I said he was involved in the first big scandal which also included wall 
street.

--- On Fri, 10/3/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008, 6:42 PM

m2smart4u2000 wrote:
 Sarah Palin Serial Winker
 
It is hard for liberals to be objective, 
honest and rational. If they were, they 
would admit that Palin is better qualified 
than Barak Obama to be President of the 
U.S.

She did a fine job against a seasoned 
opponent. Despite the negative spin, she 
is a capable, executive officer with more 
experience than Barak Obama.

Yes, his name is Barak Obama. Has anyone 
mentioned ACORN and ACORN Housing lately? 
The nuts are about to drop on Obama!

DRUDGE REPORT:

WHO WON THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?

BIDEN 143,360

PALIN 351,930





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links






  

[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:20 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:
 
  It was like she was at a cheerleading rally or something.
  I swore that if she *winked* one more time I was
  going to throw my slipper at the TV.
  Fortunately, the TV survived.
 
  Sal
 
  This is for you Sal
 
  Sarah Palin Serial Winker
 
  http://voices.washingtonpost.com/achenblog/2008/10/ 
  sarah_palin_serial_winker.html
 
 Really, there ought to be some kind of jail sentence
 for such shameless mugging...
 
 Sal


AND some more, you betcha...


Joe Biden and Sarah Palin were talking to two different Americas
Thursday night. Actually, that's unfair to Joe Biden; he was trying to
talk to everyone. I can say for certain, though, that Sarah Palin was
talking to — and winking at — her own private Idaho, and for long
stretches of the debate, it was an unnerving experience.

~~  Salon's Joan Walsh:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/election_2008/2008/10/03/palin_flubs/


WATCH video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCunBErZZJE 














[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-03 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There is no comparison between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin... Really 
there is no comparison between John McCain and Barack Obama. 


I agree with you, Louis.



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pranamoocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm a Republican but Palin is getting ripped apart by Biden in this
 debate, who appears much more informed and is debating the issues with
 more finesse. Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, while Biden is
 pointedly making Palin's statements look inaccurate.
 I wonder how much the VP choice affects voters preferences here?
 I heard on the news today it was the 7th most important issue, so
 perhaps the VP issue won't throw the election.
 Biden wins this one and Palin looks like a beginner.

I disagree. She is much less substantial and even dishonest on certain 
aspects, but unfortunately she is doing her job of playing to the base. 
They will not hear the substance, they will only care about her 
hootzpa. But if they believe this is any different than Bush then they 
are fools.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-02 Thread pranamoocher
OW- Did you notice Biden's forehead and eyebrows are frozen in place.
Must be Botoxed to the Max!!


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, pranamoocher bhrma@ wrote:
 
  I'm a Republican but Palin is getting ripped apart by Biden in this
  debate, who appears much more informed and is debating the issues
with
  more finesse. Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, while Biden
is
  pointedly making Palin's statements look inaccurate.
  I wonder how much the VP choice affects voters preferences here?
  I heard on the news today it was the 7th most important issue, so
  perhaps the VP issue won't throw the election.
  Biden wins this one and Palin looks like a beginner.

 I disagree. She is much less substantial and even dishonest on certain
 aspects, but unfortunately she is doing her job of playing to the
base.
 They will not hear the substance, they will only care about her
 hootzpa. But if they believe this is any different than Bush then they
 are fools.

 OffWorld




[FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-02 Thread m2smart4u2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But the read out there is that she didn't fall down and die.  Be 
sure that we won't be hearing from her unscripted for the rest of the 
campaign.
 
 --- On Thu, 10/2/08, pranamoocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 From: pranamoocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] God this is Painful!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008, 9:53 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I'm a Republican but Palin is getting ripped apart by Biden in this
 debate, who appears much more informed and is debating the issues 
with
 more finesse. Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, while Biden 
is
 pointedly making Palin's statements look inaccurate.
 I wonder how much the VP choice affects voters preferences here?
 I heard on the news today it was the 7th most important issue, so
 perhaps the VP issue won't throw the election.
 Biden wins this one and Palin looks like a beginner.

Yes it looked like an adult having a debate with a three year old. 
She was all rah rah but no substance.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: God this is Painful!

2008-10-02 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:07 PM, m2smart4u2000 wrote:


I'm a Republican but Palin is getting ripped apart by Biden in this
debate, who appears much more informed and is debating the issues

with

more finesse. Palin keeps trying to stick to her notes, while Biden

is

pointedly making Palin's statements look inaccurate.
I wonder how much the VP choice affects voters preferences here?
I heard on the news today it was the 7th most important issue, so
perhaps the VP issue won't throw the election.
Biden wins this one and Palin looks like a beginner.


Yes it looked like an adult having a debate with a three year old.  
She was all rah rah but no substance.


It was like she was at a cheerleading rally or something.
I swore that if she *winked* one more time I was
going to throw my slipper at the TV.
Fortunately, the TV survived.

Sal