Same with me. I'll most likely not watch live either. Hillary has got Trump beat in so many ways, but he has tremendous natural expertise in crushing an opponent and swaying an audience. Unless she's at the very top of her game--as she was during the 11-hour Benghazi hearing--she may not come off all that well. And God only knows whether the moderators will be able to handle things to keep them fair.
WaPo is nervous too! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote : I don't know about the rest of you but I am very nervous to watch the first debate. While I am confident Hillary will be prepared and battle ready I know how hard it is to try and compete with a total and utterly annoying troll in the name of common sense and real dialogue. I can only hope that the moderator will do his job and that Trump will simply come off looking like the oafish and clueless boor he is. I still may have to watch it after the fact, once I know Hillary has wiped the floor with him (God willing), but I may be able to tune it in at different moments live (for short spurts) out of sheer curiosity. Like watching a horror show through your splayed fingers. But on a bright note: /www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/07/the-two-states-that-almost-always-predict-which-candidate-is-headed-for-defeat/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_1_na
