[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-04 Thread Irmeli Mattsson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: Well, I may not be enlightened, but due to Maharishi's

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-04 Thread Vaj
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:02 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:Seeing it being all that is needed is MMY's biggest fallacy. It has justified him dishonest behaviour, because for him how his mind operates doesn't matter, only bliss matters. His thinking has probably gone in the following routes: "Because I'm

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:02 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote: Seeing it being all that is needed is MMY's biggest fallacy. It has justified him dishonest behaviour, because for him how his mind operates doesn't matter, only

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-04 Thread Irmeli Mattsson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote: When I read your responses, I get now, as I have got earlier too the impression, that you work very hard internally, to not to understand

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-03 Thread Irmeli Mattsson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I may not be enlightened, but due to Maharishi's techniques I have had experiences of the universe that I could not possibly have through any other way that I know of(except maybe brain damaging drugs).

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-07-03 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: Well, I may not be enlightened, but due to Maharishi's techniques I have had experiences of the universe that I could not possibly have

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-06-28 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term disciples that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of having disciples. Or is it simply baseless speculation? There were times when Maharishi

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name//now - The threat of Bliss

2006-06-28 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote: My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term disciples that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of having disciples.