--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Well, I may not be enlightened, but due to Maharishi's
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:02 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:Seeing it being all that is needed is MMY's biggest fallacy. It has justified him dishonest behaviour, because for him how his mind operates doesn't matter, only bliss matters. His thinking has probably gone in the following routes: "Because I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:02 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
Seeing it being all that is
needed is MMY's biggest fallacy. It has justified him dishonest
behaviour, because for him how his mind operates doesn't
matter,
only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
When I read your responses, I get now, as I have got earlier too the
impression, that you work very hard internally, to not to understand
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, I may not be enlightened, but due to Maharishi's techniques I
have had experiences of the universe that I could not possibly have
through any other way that I know of(except maybe brain damaging
drugs).
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Well, I may not be enlightened, but due to Maharishi's techniques I
have had experiences of the universe that I could not possibly have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term
disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples. Or is it simply baseless speculation?
There were times when Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term
disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples.