[FairfieldLife] Re: My appologies if this has been posted before - trouble at mill
When you say analysis what do you mean exactly? Because the conclusion that there is an alien ship in the first picture seems like a rather hastily reached conclusion. I would say it's more likely to be a plane moving fast, hence the streak of light that happens with a slow exposure such as you get in low light photographs. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, john_carter_bsc@... wrote : Hi I agree the Aliens are cleaning our atmosphere, I had some photos sent to me for analysis, taken near Derby, England 2011. The first is a Mothership and then a closeup. The person was taking pics of chemtrails, the flak of which always appears purple when analysed (true colour) When the closeup is processed an outline towards the Mothership can clearly be seen and what appears to be energy striations. I attached a few chemtrail photos just to show the fallout. Happy breathing, John
[FairfieldLife] Re: My appologies if this has been posted before - trouble at mill
Salyavin, you misunderstand. If, in a photograph of the sky, there is an unrecognisable blob of indeterminate shape, this is definite evidence of an alien spacecraft, just as much as bent straw is evidence of alien beings tampering with crops. It is interesting to watch TV shows showing images and motion pictures of these things. Those that analyse images and find nothing to support the view there are alien spacecraft tend to have a very different approach and much more in depth approach to analysis than those that come to the conclusion such images purport to show something. But in its simplest form the sceptic asks just this: What else could this be besides what people are saying it is? They then look for alternative, less exotic explanations, such has what known aircraft were in the air at that time, or is it just a reflection in the optical system of the camera, the result of a smudge on the lens, or atmospheric phenomena, etc. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : When you say analysis what do you mean exactly? Because the conclusion that there is an alien ship in the first picture seems like a rather hastily reached conclusion. I would say it's more likely to be a plane moving fast, hence the streak of light that happens with a slow exposure such as you get in low light photographs. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, john_carter_bsc@... wrote : Hi I agree the Aliens are cleaning our atmosphere, I had some photos sent to me for analysis, taken near Derby, England 2011. The first is a Mothership and then a closeup. The person was taking pics of chemtrails, the flak of which always appears purple when analysed (true colour) When the closeup is processed an outline towards the Mothership can clearly be seen and what appears to be energy striations. I attached a few chemtrail photos just to show the fallout. Happy breathing, John
[FairfieldLife] Re: My appologies if this has been posted before - trouble at mill
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : Salyavin, you misunderstand. If, in a photograph of the sky, there is an unrecognisable blob of indeterminate shape, this is definite evidence of an alien spacecraft, just as much as bent straw is evidence of alien beings tampering with crops. And if they are seen on Youtube on the same day maybe that means the mothership did the crop circles? It's all becoming clear! It is interesting to watch TV shows showing images and motion pictures of these things. Those that analyse images and find nothing to support the view there are alien spacecraft tend to have a very different approach and much more in depth approach to analysis than those that come to the conclusion such images purport to show something. But in its simplest form the sceptic asks just this: What else could this be besides what people are saying it is? They then look for alternative, less exotic explanations, such has what known aircraft were in the air at that time, or is it just a reflection in the optical system of the camera, the result of a smudge on the lens, or atmospheric phenomena, etc. There was some interesting mass hysteria in Mexico a few years back (decades possibly). It all centred on a glowing light that was seen apparently hanging over the city day after day and just after sunset. People all over the city could see it if they looked west. This should have given the video makers the first clue - if everyone could see it by looking west then it wasn't hanging over the city, but in their hysteria to prove that aliens were making contact simple tests like this got over looked. The videos I saw were narrated in a particularly insane style of hyperbole but watched with the sound off they were as funny as they were dull. I think a record must have been set for the amount of shaky videos of Venus you could collect in one place without realising what you had. They sold millions though, the need to believe overruled any scientific rigour. Nabby probably has a shelf full of them... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : When you say analysis what do you mean exactly? Because the conclusion that there is an alien ship in the first picture seems like a rather hastily reached conclusion. I would say it's more likely to be a plane moving fast, hence the streak of light that happens with a slow exposure such as you get in low light photographs. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, john_carter_bsc@... wrote : Hi I agree the Aliens are cleaning our atmosphere, I had some photos sent to me for analysis, taken near Derby, England 2011. The first is a Mothership and then a closeup. The person was taking pics of chemtrails, the flak of which always appears purple when analysed (true colour) When the closeup is processed an outline towards the Mothership can clearly be seen and what appears to be energy striations. I attached a few chemtrail photos just to show the fallout. Happy breathing, John
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My appologies if this has been posted before - trouble at mill
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote : Salyavin, you misunderstand. If, in a photograph of the sky, there is an unrecognisable blob of indeterminate shape, this is definite evidence of an alien spacecraft, just as much as bent straw is evidence of alien beings tampering with crops. On 7/24/2014 4:02 PM, salyavin808 wrote: And if they are seen on Youtube on the same day maybe that means the mothership did the crop circles? It's all becoming clear! What is not clear is what the crop circles mean. No matter whether aliens made them or humans made them, we need to know what is the message. Obviously it would be child's play for an alien spacecraft to make the crop circles, but the messgae from them may never be known. But, if the crop circles were made by humans, the answer to the riddle will be interesting when we find out what it is. However, if the crop circles were made by humans under alien direction, that would be a cause for alarm. Obviously a spirit of some kind took over the creators minds - otherwise how could they figure it all out in the dark in a single night? The crop circle could have been created by zombies in their sleep if they were directed by a higher intelligence. Go figure. It is interesting to watch TV shows showing images and motion pictures of these things. Those that analyse images and find nothing to support the view there are alien spacecraft tend to have a very different approach and much more in depth approach to analysis than those that come to the conclusion such images purport to show something. But in its simplest form the sceptic asks just this: What else could this be besides what people are saying it is? They then look for alternative, less exotic explanations, such has what known aircraft were in the air at that time, or is it just a reflection in the optical system of the camera, the result of a smudge on the lens, or atmospheric phenomena, etc. There was some interesting mass hysteria in Mexico a few years back (decades possibly). It all centred on a glowing light that was seen apparently hanging over the city day after day and just after sunset. People all over the city could see it if they looked west. This should have given the video makers the first clue - if everyone could see it by looking west then it wasn't hanging over the city, but in their hysteria to prove that aliens were making contact simple tests like this got over looked. The videos I saw were narrated in a particularly insane style of hyperbole but watched with the sound off they were as funny as they were dull. I think a record must have been set for the amount of shaky videos of Venus you could collect in one place without realising what you had. They sold millions though, the need to believe overruled any scientific rigour. Nabby probably has a shelf full of them... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : When you say analysis what do you mean exactly? Because the conclusion that there is an alien ship in the first picture seems like a rather hastily reached conclusion. I would say it's more likely to be a plane moving fast, hence the streak of light that happens with a slow exposure such as you get in low light photographs. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, john_carter_bsc@... wrote : Hi I agree the Aliens are cleaning our atmosphere, I had some photos sent to me for analysis, taken near Derby, England 2011. The first is a Mothership and then a closeup. The person was taking pics of chemtrails, the flak of which always appears purple when analysed (true colour) When the closeup is processed an outline towards the Mothership can clearly be seen and what appears to be energy striations. I attached a few chemtrail photos just to show the fallout. Happy breathing, John
