[FairfieldLife] Re: Om = mc squared??
Om=(Meissner-likeEffecttimesConsciousness)Squared The Meissner-likeEffect ofAffectiveMeditation=(NumberMeditatingSquaredTimes100)=NumberofPeopleInfluencedAtaDistancebytheProvidentialNatureofPureAwareness. JaiGuruDev The Research of Pure Review Science gives evidential feedback to what is happening. Willfully ignoring the science now is to one’s spiritual peril in a human lifetime. Manifestly then the spiritual moral is to make use of a human life while you have it in coming to meditation. cardemaister offers: https://youtu.be/AEpiOrFoNtI https://youtu.be/AEpiOrFoNtI Science and Nonduality's co-founder, Maurizio Benazzo, meets the life-like robot, Sophia, on stage. Despite his repeated asides to the audience that gazing into her eyes was a freaky experience, the lasting impression goes some way to justifying the designers' claim that Sophia could serve in healthcare, customer service, therapy and education, and be a suitable companion for the elderly at nursing homes. She is introduced here with the idea to help guide people in loving ways, through their own consciousness, using unconditional love as the motivating force. https://youtu.be/AEpiOrFoNtI Science and Nonduality's co-founder, Maurizio Benazzo, meets the life-like robot, Sophia, on stage. Despite his repeated asides to the audience that gazing into her eyes was a freaky experience, the lasting impression goes some way to justifying the designers' claim that Sophia could serve in healthcare, customer service, therapy and education, and be a suitable companion for the elderly at nursing homes. She is introduced here with the idea to help guide people in loving ways, through their own consciousness, using unconditional love as the motivating force.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
On 10/27/2013 6:05 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Patanjali said the /pranava /was the name/designation of Ishvara. Repetition of the pranava and contemplation of it leads to realization of its meaning. Repetition of OM as the nickname of the demi-god Krishna and concentrating on OM does NOT lead to realization. Anyone who repeats OM and imagines that a nonsense syllable is God, will stay on the conscious thinking level - they will NOT transcend very far but will remain on the surface level of thinking and mood-making. Are you sure you were trained by MMY as a teacher of TM?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om embedded in the tanakh?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL, while you were in the men's room... Post of the moment. I love it... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most reviled in FFL history. On Mon, 10/28/13, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 28, 2013, 2:10 PM ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL, while you were in the men's room... Post of the moment. I love it... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Oh, Barry, by a long shot. Richard is annoying, but most people figure him out quickly and stop paying much attention to him. Barry is malicious, vicious, and genuinely sadistic, absolutely determined to cause damage (even if he isn't anywhere near as successful at it as he'd like to believe). Richard is just a pain in the ass. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most reviled in FFL history. On Mon, 10/28/13, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 28, 2013, 2:10 PM ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL, while you were in the men's room... Post of the moment. I love it... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote: I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most reviled in FFL history. Well I don't revile anyone here. There are some who I might find interesting to interact with in 'real' life to see if they are either as agreeable or disagreeable as they seem to be here at FFL. A few I feel a real affinity with and others I would be curious to see if they have an online persona that is at odds with the person they are in 3D. Certainly Barry is the biggest sitting duck for major gaffs and intentional shit stirring and lazy half truths he spouts continually so he just brings the flak onto himself; no one with any self respect would let him continually fire off stink bombs at them and not call them on it. Richard is just a guy from Texas, what else would/could you expect? On Mon, 10/28/13, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 28, 2013, 2:10 PM ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL, while you were in the men's room... Post of the moment. I love it... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om embedded in the tanakh?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion... Hi Empty, I'm going to follow up on my earlier post this morning, partly to expand upon it, but also because at least three people here don't seem to understand who I was talking to. Trying to help them appear less STOOOPID, I remind them of a stern dictum issued by She Who Must Not Be Disobeyed herself: Hey, doofus, nobody was talking to you. End of story. - Judy Stein, 13 October 2013 Anyway, what I was trying to say *to you* earlier is that while I understand that it pains you to see Willytex spouting bullshit here on FFL, when you fall for it and get into it with him, you're playing *his* game, not yours. He's trolled you. That's just what he and the other troll I mentioned earlier DO. They lie in wait for someone to say something, then they rush out and search Google or Wikipedia or some batch of saved files and they post a rebuttal. It isn't *really* a rebuttal, of course -- it's an invitation for you to argue with them. If you do, they win. That's just how trolls think. The thing is, even if you *don't* fall for it and argue with them, they'll find a way to spin *that* and consider it a win for them, too. Just as the three people whom *I* did not respond to (and wasn't talking to in the first place) did today. I'm not faulting your scholarship, or trying to start some kinda argument with you, either. I'm just pointing out The Nature Of Trolls, and reminding you that it really *isn't* worth your time to try to rebut or correct them. They don't care about that. ALL that they care about is that they got you to argue with them. IMO, doing so is a classic waste of time. But if you've got so much time left in this life that you don't mind wasting it, forgive me for butting in and more power to ya...argue with them all you want. Your call...
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Judy Koan: If Barry was talking to himself while walking alone in the woods is he still lying? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Oh, Barry, by a long shot. Richard is annoying, but most people figure him out quickly and stop paying much attention to him. Barry is malicious, vicious, and genuinely sadistic, absolutely determined to cause damage (even if he isn't anywhere near as successful at it as he'd like to believe). Richard is just a pain in the ass. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most reviled in FFL history. On Mon, 10/28/13, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 28, 2013, 2:10 PM ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL, while you were in the men's room... Post of the moment. I love it... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om embedded in the tanakh?
On 10/28/2013 11:12 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion... Hi Empty, I'm going to follow up on my earlier post this morning, partly to expand upon it, but also because at least three people here don't seem to understand who I was talking to. Trying to help them appear less STOOOPID, I remind them of a stern dictum issued by She Who Must Not Be Disobeyed herself: Hey, doofus, nobody was talking to you. End of story. - Judy Stein, 13 October 2013 Anyway, what I was trying to say *to you* earlier is that while I understand that it pains you to see Willytex spouting bullshit here on FFL, when you fall for it and get into it with him, you're playing *his* game, not yours. He's trolled you. That's just what he and the other troll I mentioned earlier DO. They lie in wait for someone to say something, then they rush out and search Google or Wikipedia or some batch of saved files and they post a rebuttal. It isn't *really* a rebuttal, of course -- it's an invitation for you to argue with them. If you do, they win. That's just how trolls think. The thing is, even if you *don't* fall for it and argue with them, they'll find a way to spin *that* and consider it a win for them, too. Just as the three people whom *I* did not respond to (and wasn't talking to in the first place) did today. I'm not faulting your scholarship, or trying to start some kinda argument with you, either. I'm just pointing out The Nature Of Trolls, and reminding you that it really *isn't* worth your time to try to rebut or correct them. They don't care about that. ALL that they care about is that they got you to argue with them. IMO, doing so is a classic waste of time. But if you've got so much time left in this life that you don't mind wasting it, forgive me for butting in and more power to ya...argue with them all you want. Your call... I have a vision of a dusty, broken down abandoned small school house somewhere in the desert outside Austin where Willy is lecturing to a class . of stuffed prairie dogs. :-D
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om embedded in the tanakh?
Uh oh! Somebody got their buttons pushed. LoL! On 10/28/2013 12:49 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
It sure didn't take long for this thread to go to shit. LoL! On 10/28/2013 11:30 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote: I can't decide if Barry or WIllyTex hold the FFL record for being the most reviled in FFL history. Well I don't revile anyone here. There are some who I might find interesting to interact with in 'real' life to see if they are either as agreeable or disagreeable as they seem to be here at FFL. A few I feel a real affinity with and others I would be curious to see if they have an online persona that is at odds with the person they are in 3D. Certainly Barry is the biggest sitting duck for major gaffs and intentional shit stirring and lazy half truths he spouts continually so he just brings the flak onto himself; no one with any self respect would let him continually fire off stink bombs at them and not call them on it. Richard is just a guy from Texas, what else would/could you expect? On Mon, 10/28/13, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 28, 2013, 2:10 PM ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: uh, Barry, you should know that some ten year old kid, just posted to FFL, while you were in the men's room... Post of the moment. I love it... ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om embedded in the tanakh?
We are the Materialists, one of the schools of Indian Philosophy, founded by Brhaspati, and very old. We have always existed, and we will exist at the end of time. Our teacher is Ajitakeshakambalin, (of the hair-blanket), so-called because he wanted to be having a hair-blanket wrapped about him at all times. Go figure. We believe in four elements. Our motto is emphasize the substance, ignore the shadows. Perception is rejected as a valid means of knowledge and we reject inference as a leap in the dark. Verbal testimony is a lie. In fact we reject all means of knowledge. Earth, water, fire, and air are reality. Enjoyment is the true end of human existence. Consciousness is a product of the elements, an epi-phenomenon, and the senses are the by-product of matter. There is no other world and no individual soul: death is liberation. There is no returning here again. The three authors of the Vedas were clowns, buffoons, and knaves. Eat, drink and be merry. Pleasure is a fact, desired by all. After all, all humans are animals, and satisfaction is as natural as life itself. As Vatsyana has written: No pleasure should be neglected. On 10/28/2013 1:12 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion... Hi Empty, I'm going to follow up on my earlier post this morning, partly to expand upon it, but also because at least three people here don't seem to understand who I was talking to. Trying to help them appear less STOOOPID, I remind them of a stern dictum issued by She Who Must Not Be Disobeyed herself: Hey, doofus, nobody was talking to you. End of story. - Judy Stein, 13 October 2013 Anyway, what I was trying to say *to you* earlier is that while I understand that it pains you to see Willytex spouting bullshit here on FFL, when you fall for it and get into it with him, you're playing *his* game, not yours. He's trolled you. That's just what he and the other troll I mentioned earlier DO. They lie in wait for someone to say something, then they rush out and search Google or Wikipedia or some batch of saved files and they post a rebuttal. It isn't *really* a rebuttal, of course -- it's an invitation for you to argue with them. If you do, they win. That's just how trolls think. The thing is, even if you *don't* fall for it and argue with them, they'll find a way to spin *that* and consider it a win for them, too. Just as the three people whom *I* did not respond to (and wasn't talking to in the first place) did today. I'm not faulting your scholarship, or trying to start some kinda argument with you, either. I'm just pointing out The Nature Of Trolls, and reminding you that it really *isn't* worth your time to try to rebut or correct them. They don't care about that. ALL that they care about is that they got you to argue with them. IMO, doing so is a classic waste of time. But if you've got so much time left in this life that you don't mind wasting it, forgive me for butting in and more power to ya...argue with them all you want. Your call...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om embedded in the tanakh?
I have a vision of a dusty, broken down abandoned small school house somewhere in the desert outside Austin where Willy is lecturing to a class . of stuffed prairie dogs. [image: Inline image 1] On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote: ** On 10/28/2013 11:12 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion... Hi Empty, I'm going to follow up on my earlier post this morning, partly to expand upon it, but also because at least three people here don't seem to understand who I was talking to. Trying to help them appear less STOOOPID, I remind them of a stern dictum issued by She Who Must Not Be Disobeyed herself: Hey, doofus, nobody was talking to you. End of story. - Judy Stein, 13 October 2013 Anyway, what I was trying to say *to you* earlier is that while I understand that it pains you to see Willytex spouting bullshit here on FFL, when you fall for it and get into it with him, you're playing *his* game, not yours. He's trolled you. That's just what he and the other troll I mentioned earlier DO. They lie in wait for someone to say something, then they rush out and search Google or Wikipedia or some batch of saved files and they post a rebuttal. It isn't *really* a rebuttal, of course -- it's an invitation for you to argue with them. If you do, they win. That's just how trolls think. The thing is, even if you *don't* fall for it and argue with them, they'll find a way to spin *that* and consider it a win for them, too. Just as the three people whom *I* did not respond to (and wasn't talking to in the first place) did today. I'm not faulting your scholarship, or trying to start some kinda argument with you, either. I'm just pointing out The Nature Of Trolls, and reminding you that it really *isn't* worth your time to try to rebut or correct them. They don't care about that. ALL that they care about is that they got you to argue with them. IMO, doing so is a classic waste of time. But if you've got so much time left in this life that you don't mind wasting it, forgive me for butting in and more power to ya...argue with them all you want. Your call... I have a vision of a dusty, broken down abandoned small school house somewhere in the desert outside Austin where Willy is lecturing to a class . of stuffed prairie dogs. :-D
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. And trying to argue with him about what follows is a sure sign that you've been scammed. Willytex *succeeded* in poking your ego until it reacted, and you had to dive in to prove that you know more than he does. Trolls exist because egos do. That's what argument trolls like Willytex and Judy feed on. They don't care about who really wins any of the arguments they start, because they'll declare victory in all of them. All they care about is suckering someone's ego into reacting so that the arguments happen, and thus the declarations of victory can happen. If you react to their provocation, in their minds they win. If you *don't* react, they'll find some way to try to spin *that* into a win, too, but at least you won't be all covered with slime from interacting with them. Just my opinion... Hi Empty, I'm going to follow up on my earlier post this morning, partly to expand upon it, but also because at least three people here don't seem to understand who I was talking to. Trying to help them appear less STOOOPID, I remind them of a stern dictum issued by She Who Must Not Be Disobeyed herself: Hey, doofus, nobody was talking to you. End of story. - Judy Stein, 13 October 2013 Anyway, what I was trying to say *to you* earlier is that while I understand that it pains you to see Willytex spouting bullshit here on FFL, when you fall for it and get into it with him, you're playing *his* game, not yours. He's trolled you. That's just what he and the other troll I mentioned earlier DO. They lie in wait for someone to say something, then they rush out and search Google or Wikipedia or some batch of saved files and they post a rebuttal. It isn't *really* a rebuttal, of course -- it's an invitation for you to argue with them. If you do, they win. That's just how trolls think. The thing is, even if you *don't* fall for it and argue with them, they'll find a way to spin *that* and consider it a win for them, too. Just as the three people whom *I* did not respond to (and wasn't talking to in the first place) did today. I'm not faulting your scholarship, or trying to start some kinda argument with you, either. I'm just pointing out The Nature Of Trolls, and reminding you that it really *isn't* worth your time to try to rebut or correct them. They don't care about that. ALL that they care about is that they got you to argue with them. IMO, doing so is a classic waste of time. But if you've got so much time left in this life that you don't mind wasting it, forgive me for butting in and more power to ya...argue with them all you want. Your call... Barry takes the time and the 'trouble' to once more advise someone about falling for and responding to and satisfying the 'trolls' of FFL all the while in doing so he is responding to and falling for and satisfying the 'trolls' of FFL. If you really wanted to prove your point, Barry, and follow your own advice you'd button it.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
View Source Card, maybe they made a typo and yom should really be yum. As in yummy soma. Also not to be taken seriously (-: Well, to change 'yom' to 'yum' one only needs to move the dot of the nikkud 'cholem vav' (o) inside the 'vav' , and it becomes a shureq (u)... ??? https://www.google.fi/search?q=cholem+vavsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=BdtsUs_jJIiS4ASj9YH4AQsqi=2ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQbiw=1280bih=631 https://www.google.fi/search?q=cholem+vavsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=BdtsUs_jJIiS4ASj9YH4AQsqi=2ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQbiw=1280bih=631 https://www.google.fi/search?q=cholem+vavsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=BdtsUs_jJIiS4ASj9YH4AQsqi=2ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQbiw=1280bih=631#q=shureqtbm=isch https://www.google.fi/search?q=cholem+vavsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=BdtsUs_jJIiS4ASj9YH4AQsqi=2ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQbiw=1280bih=631#q=shureqtbm=isch LOL! ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Card, maybe they made a typo and yom should really be yum. As in yummy soma. Also not to be taken seriously (-: On Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:08 AM, cardemaister@... cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh?
yep, that's what I thought (-: On Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:23 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com cardemais...@yahoo.com wrote: View Source Card, maybe they made a typo and yom should really be yum. As in yummy soma. Also not to be taken seriously (-: Well, to change 'yom' to 'yum' one only needs to move the dot of the nikkud 'cholem vav' (o) inside the 'vav' , and it becomes a shureq (u)... ??? https://www.google.fi/search?q=cholem+vavsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=BdtsUs_jJIiS4ASj9YH4AQsqi=2ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQbiw=1280bih=631 https://www.google.fi/search?q=cholem+vavsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=BdtsUs_jJIiS4ASj9YH4AQsqi=2ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQbiw=1280bih=631#q=shureqtbm=isch LOL! ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Card, maybe they made a typo and yom should really be yum. As in yummy soma. Also not to be taken seriously (-: On Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:08 AM, cardemaister@... cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
It is a fact that here are no bija mantras mentioned in the Rig Veda. So, how would the SSRS know any bijas from being a Vedic Pandit? There are no bija mantras mentioned by Patanjali. The historical Buddha doesn't mention any bija mantras. So, the bija mantras usage must have come AFTER the rise of Buddhism (463 BC) in India and Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (200 BC). The Siddha tradition of using bija mantras can be traced back to the Vajrayana Buddhism which probably began at Odisha, or in the modern day Swat Valley in what is now Pakistan during the Gupta Age. Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric, in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs directly from teacher to student during an initiation or empowerment and cannot be simply learned from a book. So, SSRS get the bija mantras from MMY without even becoming a TM teacher - it has not been established where and from whom MMY got the list of bijas, but you only get one bija in TM - so how did MMY and SSRS get to know all the bija mantras? They probably read about the bija mantras in a yoga book. Because no TM teacher would give out seventeen different bijas to one student. Go figure. On 10/26/2013 11:20 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: SSRS, although a mahapundit of the four vedas, should have asked you first. Although he had a number of teachers other than MMY, he obviously never asked permission from you - the punditster. I'm sure he regrets the omission to this day. I'm also sure you could clarify his pronunciation of the riks, reveal the hidden connections between between the vaious chhanda-s. Maybe you could obtain the blessing of the deva-s and get him authorized for using these cheating bijas stolen from the Buddhists. You should call him and offer to help him out. However, I wouldn't use your Prairie Dog credentials. Rather you should just introduce yourself as a pandit dedicated to cleaning up the fallen lineage of pseudo-pandits using fake bijas. You could give him a copy of the The Tantric Tradition by Leopold Fischer (agehananda bharati) and just point out You need to read this and stop ripping everyone off! So great of you to consider this. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If you can't reveal where MMY got the bijas, so how could you say SSRS got any bijas? There aren't any bijas mentioned in the Vedas. From what I've read, SSRS, like Deepak Chopra and Charlie Lutes, never became TM teachers by completing a TTC. So, how would they be knowing any bijas? Go figure. On 10/24/2013 7:41 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras? *SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation. However, I was never taught his sahaj-meditation technique so I did not receive one of his chosen meditation bija-mantras. * * * *What I asked him for (asked four times over a 7 year period) was guru-mantra. When he finally gave it to me it was a maha-mantra that named the source of our teaching lineage. If you consider the guru-puja which is performed **at initiation **then you can guess which mantra. I received it along with another one of SSRS's teachers who often stayed at my house. According to that teacher, he also received the same maha-mantra (it includes om).* *I couldn't have asked for a better mantra. I use it after my tm-mantra and before I perform sanyama on a few select sutras that work especially well for me. * *SSRS did tell me and that all the different bija-mantras naturally merge into the om sound at the finest level. * *BTW - the sankhya-yoga scholar said the same ... no problem with using om if sheltered in a longer mantra. *
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Prairie Dog Troll You are such an ignorant, pseudo-intellectual bullshitter that you'll make any kind of claim just to appear like you know something. I would call you a liar but in actuality you are just arrogantly stupid. Patanjali talks extensively about OM you fool. He uses the standard vedic term pranava. See YS 1.27 - tasya vâcaka.h pra.nava.h “(His) designation is the pranava (pronouncement)”. Prairie Dog sez: Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric, in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs directly from teacher to student during an initiation or empowerment and cannot be simply learned from a book. Idiot! I’ve had a Vajrayana and Dzogchen teacher for a decade. You are only a stinking troll parroting something you read in a book. You don’t know shit about Vajrayana. Prairie Dog sez: So, SSRS get the bija mantras from MMY without even becoming a TM teacher - it has not been established where and from whom MMY got the list of bijas, but you only get one bija in TM - so how did MMY and SSRS get to know all the bija mantras? They probably read about the bija mantras in a yoga book. Because no TM teacher would give out seventeen different bijas to one student. Go figure. Brahmarishi Devarata said that the supreme bija of the Rg Veda is Im, of Yajur Veda is Shri and of the Upanishads is the pranava Om. The supreme bija of Prairie Dog yoga is Duh! ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: It is a fact that here are no bija mantras mentioned in the Rig Veda. So, how would the SSRS know any bijas from being a Vedic Pandit? There are no bija mantras mentioned by Patanjali. The historical Buddha doesn't mention any bija mantras. So, the bija mantras usage must have come AFTER the rise of Buddhism (463 BC) in India and Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (200 BC). The Siddha tradition of using bija mantras can be traced back to the Vajrayana Buddhism which probably began at Odisha, or in the modern day Swat Valley in what is now Pakistan during the Gupta Age. Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric, in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs directly from teacher to student during an initiation or empowerment and cannot be simply learned from a book. So, SSRS get the bija mantras from MMY without even becoming a TM teacher - it has not been established where and from whom MMY got the list of bijas, but you only get one bija in TM - so how did MMY and SSRS get to know all the bija mantras? They probably read about the bija mantras in a yoga book. Because no TM teacher would give out seventeen different bijas to one student. Go figure. On 10/26/2013 11:20 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: SSRS, although a mahapundit of the four vedas, should have asked you first. Although he had a number of teachers other than MMY, he obviously never asked permission from you - the punditster. I'm sure he regrets the omission to this day. I'm also sure you could clarify his pronunciation of the riks, reveal the hidden connections between between the vaious chhanda-s. Maybe you could obtain the blessing of the deva-s and get him authorized for using these cheating bijas stolen from the Buddhists. You should call him and offer to help him out. However, I wouldn't use your Prairie Dog credentials. Rather you should just introduce yourself as a pandit dedicated to cleaning up the fallen lineage of pseudo-pandits using fake bijas. You could give him a copy of the The Tantric Tradition by Leopold Fischer (agehananda bharati) and just point out You need to read this and stop ripping everyone off! So great of you to consider this. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If you can't reveal where MMY got the bijas, so how could you say SSRS got any bijas? There aren't any bijas mentioned in the Vedas. From what I've read, SSRS, like Deepak Chopra and Charlie Lutes, never became TM teachers by completing a TTC. So, how would they be knowing any bijas? Go figure. On 10/24/2013 7:41 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras? SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation. However, I was never taught his sahaj-meditation technique so I did not receive one of his chosen meditation bija-mantras. What I asked him for (asked four times over a 7 year period) was guru-mantra. When he finally gave it to me it was a maha-mantra that named the source of our teaching lineage. If you consider the guru-puja which is performed at initiation then you can guess which
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh?
So, let's sum up what we know about the bija mantras used in TM. It has already been established that MMY got one single bija mantra from his teacher SBS. It has also been established that SSRS cribbed the list of bijas from MMY. It has NOT been established that SSRS has had a tantric yoga teacher other than MMY. Let's face it - the bija mantras used in TM were cribbed from a tantra yoga book. Why would SBS give a whole list of bijas to MMY if SBS didn't even endorse MMY to teach tantra? According to SBS, the monosyllable 'OM' isn't a bija (seed) sound at all - it's just a place-holder for the bija given in initiation. The Pranava is OM, but OM is not a bija, it;s just a symbol for the Vedic Sun God. If there were any bijas to meditate on when Patanjali compiled the Yoga Sutras he would have mentioned them, would he not? Or, the historical Buddha would have mentioned them. Or, MMY would have said that the TM bija mantras came from the Vedas. Or, Larry Domash would have told us the bijas came from the Vedas. They did not. So, it would seem that the Marshy got confused - instead of extolling the Vedas, he should have been promoting the Tantras. Apparently there are no 'bija' mantras mentioned in the Rig Veda. In order to establish the TM practice, the Marshy should have been explaining how TM came to use the tantric bija mantras. From what I've read, TM practice and the use of bijas comes from the Sri Vidya, and not from the Rig Veda. Sri Vidya is a tantric sect, purportedly founded by Shankaracharya. Swami Brahmanand Saraswati was a member of the Sri Vidya - all the Saraswati dasnamis are headquarted at Sringeri. SBS's guru, Swami Krishanand Saraswati, was from Sringeri. The primary symbol of the Sri Vidya is the Shri Yantra, not the OM symbol. So, it's obvious that TM adherents should be looking to the Tantras, such as the 'Saundaryalahari' for the origins of TM, not the to the Vedas. The Rig Veda has little to say about yoga practices such as 'TM'. The Rig Veda is based on sacrificial rituals, dedicated to appeasing the celestial beings that control the forces of nature, such as earth, wind and fire, etc. The Devatas, such as Krishna, Balarama, Vasudeva, and Ramchandra are deified heroes of Indian mythology. There are no 'istadevatas' mentioned in the Rig Veda, so how could there be any istadevata bija mantras? Go figure. The use of bijas came a long time after the composition of the Rig Veda, during the Gupta age in India. Bija mantras are products of the Indian alchemists, not the Vedic Rishis. The Rig Veda was probably compiled before the Aryan speakers even arrived in India. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: ** Prairie Dog Troll You are such an ignorant, pseudo-intellectual bullshitter that you'll make any kind of claim just to appear like you know something. I would call you a liar but in actuality you are just arrogantly stupid. Patanjali talks extensively about OM you fool. He uses the standard vedic term *pranava*. *See** YS 1.27 - tasya vâcaka.h pra.nava.h “(His) designation is the pranava (pronouncement)”.* *Prairie Dog sez:* *Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric, in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs directly from teacher to student during an initiation or empowerment and cannot be simply learned from a book.* Idiot! I’ve had a Vajrayana and Dzogchen teacher for a decade. You are only a stinking troll parroting something you read in a book. You don’t know shit about Vajrayana. *Prairie Dog sez:* *So, SSRS get the bija mantras from MMY without even becoming a TM teacher - it has not been established where and from whom MMY got the list of bijas, but you only get one bija in TM - so how did MMY and SSRS get to know all the bija mantras? They probably read about the bija mantras in a yoga book. Because no TM teacher would give out seventeen different bijas to one student. Go figure.* Brahmarishi Devarata said that the supreme bija of the Rg Veda is *Im,*of Yajur Veda is *Shri* and of the Upanishads is the pranava *Om*. The supreme bija of Prairie Dog yoga is *Duh*! ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: It is a fact that here are no bija mantras mentioned in the Rig Veda. So, how would the SSRS know any bijas from being a Vedic Pandit? There are no bija mantras mentioned by Patanjali. The historical Buddha doesn't mention any bija mantras. So, the bija mantras usage must have come AFTER the rise of Buddhism (463 BC) in India and Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (200 BC). The Siddha tradition of using bija mantras can be traced back to the Vajrayana Buddhism which probably began at Odisha, or in the modern day Swat Valley in what is now Pakistan during the Gupta Age. Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric, in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs directly from teacher to student during an initiation or empowerment and cannot be simply
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
So, let's sum up what we know ... This is the sure sign of a scammer. You are so ignorant you don't even know the basic stuff. Any self-respecting Indian (who isn't a communist) always has 20-30 mantras on-hand just in case there is need to get the gods favor for something. Maybe so but ... is the confession of a deceiver who believes that just by endlessly repeating a claim others will believe it. Patanjali said the pranava was the name/designation of Ishvara. Repetition of the pranava and contemplation of it leads to realization of its meaning. Judy was quite right. You are a FFL troll. You don’t know anything but shit you read. You are an arrogant fool. Oh … did I mention that you are also a cheat and a thief? Maybe so but … ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: So, let's sum up what we know about the bija mantras used in TM. It has already been established that MMY got one single bija mantra from his teacher SBS. It has also been established that SSRS cribbed the list of bijas from MMY. It has NOT been established that SSRS has had a tantric yoga teacher other than MMY. Let's face it - the bija mantras used in TM were cribbed from a tantra yoga book. Why would SBS give a whole list of bijas to MMY if SBS didn't even endorse MMY to teach tantra? According to SBS, the monosyllable 'OM' isn't a bija (seed) sound at all - it's just a place-holder for the bija given in initiation. The Pranava is OM, but OM is not a bija, it;s just a symbol for the Vedic Sun God. If there were any bijas to meditate on when Patanjali compiled the Yoga Sutras he would have mentioned them, would he not? Or, the historical Buddha would have mentioned them. Or, MMY would have said that the TM bija mantras came from the Vedas. Or, Larry Domash would have told us the bijas came from the Vedas. They did not. So, it would seem that the Marshy got confused - instead of extolling the Vedas, he should have been promoting the Tantras. Apparently there are no 'bija' mantras mentioned in the Rig Veda. In order to establish the TM practice, the Marshy should have been explaining how TM came to use the tantric bija mantras. From what I've read, TM practice and the use of bijas comes from the Sri Vidya, and not from the Rig Veda. Sri Vidya is a tantric sect, purportedly founded by Shankaracharya. Swami Brahmanand Saraswati was a member of the Sri Vidya - all the Saraswati dasnamis are headquarted at Sringeri. SBS's guru, Swami Krishanand Saraswati, was from Sringeri. The primary symbol of the Sri Vidya is the Shri Yantra, not the OM symbol. So, it's obvious that TM adherents should be looking to the Tantras, such as the 'Saundaryalahari' for the origins of TM, not the to the Vedas. The Rig Veda has little to say about yoga practices such as 'TM'. The Rig Veda is based on sacrificial rituals, dedicated to appeasing the celestial beings that control the forces of nature, such as earth, wind and fire, etc. The Devatas, such as Krishna, Balarama, Vasudeva, and Ramchandra are deified heroes of Indian mythology. There are no 'istadevatas' mentioned in the Rig Veda, so how could there be any istadevata bija mantras? Go figure. The use of bijas came a long time after the composition of the Rig Veda, during the Gupta age in India. Bija mantras are products of the Indian alchemists, not the Vedic Rishis. The Rig Veda was probably compiled before the Aryan speakers even arrived in India. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Prairie Dog Troll You are such an ignorant, pseudo-intellectual bullshitter that you'll make any kind of claim just to appear like you know something. I would call you a liar but in actuality you are just arrogantly stupid. Patanjali talks extensively about OM you fool. He uses the standard vedic term pranava. See YS 1.27 - tasya vâcaka.h pra.nava.h “(His) designation is the pranava (pronouncement)”. Prairie Dog sez: Vajrayana Buddhism is esoteric, in the sense that the transmission of certain teachings only occurs directly from teacher to student during an initiation or empowerment and cannot be simply learned from a book. Idiot! I’ve had a Vajrayana and Dzogchen teacher for a decade. You are only a stinking troll parroting something you read in a book. You don’t know shit about Vajrayana. Prairie Dog sez: So, SSRS get the bija mantras from MMY without even becoming a TM teacher - it has not been established where and from whom MMY got the list of bijas, but you only get one bija in TM - so how did MMY and SSRS get to know all the bija mantras? They probably read about the bija mantras in a yoga book. Because no TM teacher would give out seventeen different bijas to one student. Go figure. Brahmarishi Devarata said that the supreme bija of the Rg Veda is Im, of Yajur Veda is Shri and of the Upanishads is the
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
It is said that Narayana mantra can take you all the way - Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. there is versions that do not include om. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If you can't reveal where MMY got the bijas, so how could you say SSRS got any bijas? There aren't any bijas mentioned in the Vedas. From what I've read, SSRS, like Deepak Chopra and Charlie Lutes, never became TM teachers by completing a TTC. So, how would they be knowing any bijas? Go figure. On 10/24/2013 7:41 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras? SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation. However, I was never taught his sahaj-meditation technique so I did not receive one of his chosen meditation bija-mantras. What I asked him for (asked four times over a 7 year period) was guru-mantra. When he finally gave it to me it was a maha-mantra that named the source of our teaching lineage. If you consider the guru-puja which is performed at initiation then you can guess which mantra. I received it along with another one of SSRS's teachers who often stayed at my house. According to that teacher, he also received the same maha-mantra (it includes om). I couldn't have asked for a better mantra. I use it after my tm-mantra and before I perform sanyama on a few select sutras that work especially well for me. SSRS did tell me and that all the different bija-mantras naturally merge into the om sound at the finest level. BTW - the sankhya-yoga scholar said the same ... no problem with using om if sheltered in a longer mantra.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
SSRS, although a mahapundit of the four vedas, should have asked you first. Although he had a number of teachers other than MMY, he obviously never asked permission from you - the punditster. I'm sure he regrets the omission to this day. I'm also sure you could clarify his pronunciation of the riks, reveal the hidden connections between between the vaious chhanda-s. Maybe you could obtain the blessing of the deva-s and get him authorized for using these cheating bijas stolen from the Buddhists. You should call him and offer to help him out. However, I wouldn't use your Prairie Dog credentials. Rather you should just introduce yourself as a pandit dedicated to cleaning up the fallen lineage of pseudo-pandits using fake bijas. You could give him a copy of the The Tantric Tradition by Leopold Fischer (agehananda bharati) and just point out You need to read this and stop ripping everyone off! So great of you to consider this. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If you can't reveal where MMY got the bijas, so how could you say SSRS got any bijas? There aren't any bijas mentioned in the Vedas. From what I've read, SSRS, like Deepak Chopra and Charlie Lutes, never became TM teachers by completing a TTC. So, how would they be knowing any bijas? Go figure. On 10/24/2013 7:41 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras? SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation. However, I was never taught his sahaj-meditation technique so I did not receive one of his chosen meditation bija-mantras. What I asked him for (asked four times over a 7 year period) was guru-mantra. When he finally gave it to me it was a maha-mantra that named the source of our teaching lineage. If you consider the guru-puja which is performed at initiation then you can guess which mantra. I received it along with another one of SSRS's teachers who often stayed at my house. According to that teacher, he also received the same maha-mantra (it includes om). I couldn't have asked for a better mantra. I use it after my tm-mantra and before I perform sanyama on a few select sutras that work especially well for me. SSRS did tell me and that all the different bija-mantras naturally merge into the om sound at the finest level. BTW - the sankhya-yoga scholar said the same ... no problem with using om if sheltered in a longer mantra.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Under whose authority would the SSRS be giving out any bija mantras? If you can't reveal where MMY got the bijas, so how could you say SSRS got any bijas? There aren't any bijas mentioned in the Vedas. From what I've read, SSRS, like Deepak Chopra and Charlie Lutes, never became TM teachers by completing a TTC. So, how would they be knowing any bijas? Go figure. On 10/24/2013 7:41 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras? *SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation. However, I was never taught his sahaj-meditation technique so I did not receive one of his chosen meditation bija-mantras. * * * *What I asked him for (asked four times over a 7 year period) was guru-mantra. When he finally gave it to me it was a maha-mantra that named the source of our teaching lineage. If you consider the guru-puja which is performed **at initiation **then you can guess which mantra. I received it along with another one of SSRS's teachers who often stayed at my house. According to that teacher, he also received the same maha-mantra (it includes om).* *I couldn't have asked for a better mantra. I use it after my tm-mantra and before I perform sanyama on a few select sutras that work especially well for me. * *SSRS did tell me and that all the different bija-mantras naturally merge into the om sound at the finest level. * *BTW - the sankhya-yoga scholar said the same ... no problem with using om if sheltered in a longer mantra. *
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Whomever gave you the dressing down only needs to look at a few news articles about the current state of India to know that neither Marshy nor any of these other supposed god men has done a damn thing to save India. On Thu, 10/24/13, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013, 11:07 AM So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma',so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament)it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appearsseveral times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
SSRS, a vedic pandit, has given out OM as part of traditional maha-mantras. After receiving one from him, I asked the OM question to a sankhya-yoga scholar, a former TMer and student of SSRS. He said No possible problem if included within a traditional maha-mantra ... like om namo bhagavate vasudevaya. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: He said OM was a mantra for recluses, I believe. It's in Beacon Light of the Himalayas. Buck wrote: So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
'OM it is of relatively recent oirgin, from the time of Pannini, who arranged Sanskrit into a written language. OM is a symbol that was invented by the Indian alchemists much later than Pannini, in order to make their system seem profound and esoteric. 'Om is nothing more than a phoneme, or a quasi phoneme, made up by Brahmins in order to confuse the people. It is merely a salutation, similar to the Latin 'Amen', a phrase meaning 'So be it'. It is not a 'bija' mantra at all. If chanting 'OM' had been a known means of liberation, it would have been mentioned by the historical Buddha, or carved onto an Ashokan Pillar or something. In reality, the 'OM' 'sound' is just another instance of the Indian proclivity for making simple things seem mysterious. It is a 'mantra' by courtesy only, according to Swami Ageananda Bharati, the author of the definitive work on mantra, 'The Tantric Tradition'. Work cited: 'The Tantric Tradition' Ageananda Bharati Rider, 1965 On 10/24/2013 6:07 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote: So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Yeah, all those god men can't compare to all the good you've done for India. LoL! On 10/24/2013 7:42 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: Whomever gave you the dressing down only needs to look at a few news articles about the current state of India to know that neither Marshy nor any of these other supposed god men has done a damn thing to save India. On Thu, 10/24/13, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh? To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013, 11:07 AM So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma',so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament)it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appearsseveral times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
SSRS teaches techniques that are very similar to the TM practice of MMY. It's a matter of positioning and placement, Sudarsha Kriya is a hatha yoga asana and involves rhythmic breathing techniques in Vajrasana and Sukhasana. It's not complicated. The similarity to Buddhist Yoga is obvious. It has already been established that SK and TM are just common Indian meditation exercises designed to relieve stress, similar to Buddhist meditation practices such as Kum Nye and Vippasana. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum_Nye However, it is doubtful that SSRS was ever initiated into any esoteric tantric school, so he wouldn't be knowing any secret bija mantras that he could issue with any authority. Everyone knows you have to agree to a non-disclosure agreement in order to learn from an authentic tantric guru. Go figure. But, for the average pundit, espousing on OM seems an easy thing to pontificate about. After all, it worked for Lobsang Rampa and the Zen Master Rama. LoL! On 10/24/2013 8:06 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: SSRS, a vedic pandit, has given out OM as part of traditional maha-mantras. After receiving one from him, I asked the OM question to a sankhya-yoga scholar, a former TMer and student of SSRS. He said No possible problem if included within a traditional maha-mantra ... like om namo bhagavate vasudevaya. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: *He said OM was a mantra for recluses, I believe. It's in Beacon Light of* *the Himalayas.* * Buck wrote:* So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
A-U-M is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end of all creation. MMY once described AUM (paraphrased) like hearing a City from a distance, you can hear the drone of the City, only when you get up close can you distinguish the individual sounds. These individual sounds are the sounds of creation and the Ved, these individual sound vibrations ARE the Vedic Gods. The Divine Mother is the source/essence/substance of them all; all is AUM, and AUM is all. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: SSRS teaches techniques that are very similar to the TM practice of MMY. It's a matter of positioning and placement, Sudarsha Kriya is a hatha yoga asana and involves rhythmic breathing techniques in Vajrasana and Sukhasana. It's not complicated. The similarity to Buddhist Yoga is obvious. It has already been established that SK and TM are just common Indian meditation exercises designed to relieve stress, similar to Buddhist meditation practices such as Kum Nye and Vippasana. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum_Nye http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum_Nye However, it is doubtful that SSRS was ever initiated into any esoteric tantric school, so he wouldn't be knowing any secret bija mantras that he could issue with any authority. Everyone knows you have to agree to a non-disclosure agreement in order to learn from an authentic tantric guru. Go figure. But, for the average pundit, espousing on OM seems an easy thing to pontificate about. After all, it worked for Lobsang Rampa and the Zen Master Rama. LoL! On 10/24/2013 8:06 AM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote: SSRS, a vedic pandit, has given out OM as part of traditional maha-mantras. After receiving one from him, I asked the OM question to a sankhya-yoga scholar, a former TMer and student of SSRS. He said No possible problem if included within a traditional maha-mantra ... like om namo bhagavate vasudevaya. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: He said OM was a mantra for recluses, I believe. It's in Beacon Light of the Himalayas. Buck wrote: So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om embedded in the tanakh?
thanks, wgm, very wonderful knowledge on and analogy about AUM... On Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:57 PM, wgm4u no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: A-U-M is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end of all creation. MMY once described AUM (paraphrased) like hearing a City from a distance, you can hear the drone of the City, only when you get up close can you distinguish the individual sounds. These individual sounds are the sounds of creation and the Ved, these individual sound vibrations ARE the Vedic Gods. The Divine Mother is the source/essence/substance of them all; all is AUM, and AUM is all. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: SSRS teaches techniques that are very similar to the TM practice of MMY. It's a matter of positioning and placement, Sudarsha Kriya is a hatha yoga asana and involves rhythmic breathing techniques in Vajrasana and Sukhasana. It's not complicated. The similarity to Buddhist Yoga is obvious. It has already been established that SK and TM are just common Indian meditation exercises designed to relieve stress, similar to Buddhist meditation practices such as Kum Nye and Vippasana. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum_Nye However, it is doubtful that SSRS was ever initiated into any esoteric tantric school, so he wouldn't be knowing any secret bija mantras that he could issue with any authority. Everyone knows you have to agree to a non-disclosure agreement in order to learn from an authentic tantric guru. Go figure. But, for the average pundit, espousing on OM seems an easy thing to pontificate about. After all, it worked for Lobsang Rampa and the Zen Master Rama. LoL! On 10/24/2013 8:06 AM, emptybill@... wrote: SSRS, a vedic pandit, has given out OM as part of traditional maha-mantras. After receiving one from him, I asked the OM question to a sankhya-yoga scholar, a former TMer and student of SSRS. He said No possible problem if included within a traditional maha-mantra ... like om namo bhagavate vasudevaya. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: He said OM was a mantra for recluses, I believe. It's in Beacon Light of the Himalayas. Buck wrote: So[m], what was Maharishi's particular teaching on Om? His was counter to everything Om, wasn't it. He did not use Om in any of the mantras he gave. Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about his Vedic studies around Om? I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around the understanding of Om. What did he say that Om aum was so bad that puts him opposed to Om? While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very in favor of Om spiritually. See Guru Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What is your experience with Om? I find it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex. Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to Om for the TM spiritual community. Does that explain something about the TM community? What is your experience with it and what was really said about it? Just wondering, -Buck ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote: (Not to be taken all too seriously...) Just as 'om' may be embedded in the word 'soma', so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament) it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
[FairfieldLife] RE: Om quot;embeddedquot; in the tanakh?
Authfriend: Today at 8:16 AM So what would the problem be if OM wasn't included in a maha-mantra but rather along with, say, a bija mantra like what TM uses? Did Sri Sri give out bija mantras, or just the maha-mantras? SSRS does indeed give out bija-mantras for meditation. However, I was never taught his sahaj-meditation technique so I did not receive one of his chosen meditation bija-mantras. What I asked him for (asked four times over a 7 year period) was guru-mantra. When he finally gave it to me it was a maha-mantra that named the source of our teaching lineage. If you consider the guru-puja which is performed at initiation then you can guess which mantra. I received it along with another one of SSRS's teachers who often stayed at my house. According to that teacher, he also received the same maha-mantra (it includes om). I couldn't have asked for a better mantra. I use it after my tm-mantra and before I perform sanyama on a few select sutras that work especially well for me. SSRS did tell me and that all the different bija-mantras naturally merge into the om sound at the finest level. BTW - the sankhya-yoga scholar said the same ... no problem with using om if sheltered in a longer mantra.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
You must have got a corn cob stuck up your ass today - snip Rory: Smutty? Childish? Obscene and pornographic? OK, I get it, Richard, you were just kidding. Good one! Now this is really funny - I get attacked by Steve for being a troll for posting childish smut when I was just indulging in a bit of harmless wordplay with Tantric overtones, for pointing out that Rory and Alex were being smutty and childish. You've got to admit, Rory, this is funny. LoL! Rory: could it be most of them leave because they get attacked for being smutty and childish when they indulge in a bit of harmless wordplay with Tantric overtones? 7Ray: It's called being a troll, Richard. Unfortunately you have honed that skill.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Richard you do occasionally render me speechless, which my wife and probably others worldwide would definitely thank you for! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: You must have got a corn cob stuck up your ass today - snip Rory: Smutty? Childish? Obscene and pornographic? OK, I get it, Richard, you were just kidding. Good one! Now this is really funny - I get attacked by Steve for being a troll for posting childish smut when I was just indulging in a bit of harmless wordplay with Tantric overtones, for pointing out that Rory and Alex were being smutty and childish. You've got to admit, Rory, this is funny. LoL! Rory: could it be most of them leave because they get attacked for being smutty and childish when they indulge in a bit of harmless wordplay with Tantric overtones? 7Ray: It's called being a troll, Richard. Unfortunately you have honed that skill.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! I'm almost certain that's Latin 'cum': lassi *with* OM!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Ha! Good one, Alex... but of course, I only meant cum in the Latin sense, meaning with -- hence, Lassi with OM, but as a pun on Lassie come home, of course, of course. Oh, I got the pun. I was just having fun, recreationally lashing out at my own shadow. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Obbajee, it's all those planets in nakshatras ruled by Rahu, not to mention new Moon in serpent nakshatra. Enjoy! PS Happy CC etc to Alex and his shadow (-: From: obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 10:43 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day! Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am combining threads
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Wonderful Maharishi quote, Mike, thanks for posting. Now you got me pondering about hearing and listening and what that might have to do with signal and noise. In fact, if the medium is the message, then is there even signal and noise?! From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 6:08 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day! *M* said at the First Symposium on the Science of Creative Intelligence at Amherst Ma. When you find something good, you can't rest until you share it with the world. But... nobody has to listen. If they *hear* but aren't listening, what's one more noise? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day! WHY? Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from rooftops? Why are you forced to share it? The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com; mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@... To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Ohh Mammy Yellow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=pQ-B8n6N2s4t=5\
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=pQ-B8n6N2s4t=\
50
(Lile Wallace asks Maharishi why he left the silence of the Himalayas
and came to the West...)
Oh Mammy Blue
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwVfci-YtMM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwVfci-YtMM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon wrote:
*M* said at the First Symposium on the Science of Creative
Intelligence at Amherst Ma. When you find something good, you can't
rest until you share it with the world. But... nobody has to
listen. If they *hear* but aren't listening, what's one more noise?
From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Â
WHY?
Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from
rooftops?
Why are you forced to share it?
The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
Â
--- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon
mdixon.6569@ wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to
shout it from the roof tops.
WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly
completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has
to be forced to share it? From:
Share Long sharelong60@
To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com;Sent: Wednesday,
August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day!
I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting.
From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@
To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday,
August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day!
When the Unified Field Walked!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/07/2013 06:07 PM, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! You didn't graduate summa cum laude? Omnia mea mecum (me + cum) porto!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: On 08/07/2013 06:07 PM, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! You didn't graduate summa cum laude? Omnia mea mecum (me + cum) Are you referring to Smexy -Let -me -cum song by the Panther!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w15_JEEEgvU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w15_JEEEgvU .porto! and i thought you ref.to All of my goods are with me: justice, virtue, prudence(iustitia, virtus, prudentia, hoc ipsum, nihil bonum putare quod eripi possit.), by Seneca in his Epistulae Morales 9.18-19, Seneca,Cicero, in his Paradoxa Stoicorum 1.1.8,and Valerius Maximus 7.2.ext [:D] have a good night
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Ha! Good one, Alex... but of course, I only meant cum in the Latin sense, meaning with -- hence, Lassi with OM, but as a pun on Lassie come home, of course, of course. Oh, I got the pun. I was just having fun, recreationally lashing out at my own shadow. Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Sex Day!
On 8/7/2013 11:53 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Alex, is this too explicit? I'm more worried about Uncle Tantrum - he's going to go ballistic since he gets his lassi at bordels mobiles de campagne Well, I'm worried that it's not looking very promising for the month-long unlimited posting. This month so far, we've had informants fink on the MUM students, administrators, and teachers; finked on their father, mother, brothers and sisters; gays and lesbians; cross-dressers; and several swingers in FF; and now we're outing the FFL whores and pimps? Go figure. fink: rat fink informant She says her boss is a rotten fink. his own brother turned out to be the fink who ratted them out to the police http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fink On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:43 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Hilarious, dear Obba. Better than a bodice-buster and sweeter than a wet dream. Yes guys, women have them too. Deep bow, Obba, cum laude. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am combining threads because I am attempting to try and not try to post
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Wonderful Maharishi quote, Mike, thanks for posting. Now you got me pondering about hearing and listening and what that might have to do with signal and noise. What it has to do, in this context, is that if you don't actually hear (take in, understand) something it becomes a sort of noise. Share, do you really need 'answers' to these questions of yours or do you just pull things randomly out of that hat you have stuck on your head? Are these 'questions' asked because you actually need an answer or you just want a little attention, no matter how silly the question? This quote of MMY's is neither profound or hard to decipher. In fact, if the medium is the message, then is there even signal and noise?! If a question is asked disingenuously or without thinking first (or pulled out of a hat) is it just random, nonsensical attention-seeking noise?! From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 6:08 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!  *M* said at the First Symposium on the Science of Creative Intelligence at Amherst Ma. When you find something good, you can't rest until you share it with the world. But... nobody has to listen. If they *hear* but aren't listening, what's one more noise? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!  WHY? Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from rooftops? Why are you forced to share it? The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:  --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@ To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com; mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@ To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog wrote: Hilarious, dear Obba. Better than a bodice-buster and sweeter than a wet dream. Yes guys, women have them too. Deep bow, Obba, cum laude. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it! Happy Birthday, Alex! You're The Cream In My Coffee http://youtu.be/m-6m2CC0pPM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY ALEX! Praise be to the filter feeders (smile, smiley face, smile, smiley face). May your 53rd year be the best ever! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
On 08/08/2013 07:07 AM, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it! Well, better than me waking up in a strange place on my 50th and puking. Nope, not in Las Vegas but Varanasi, India. Neat place, bad stomach. Seems the kitchen wasn't up to snuff the night before and I think a few others staying at the bed, breakfast and dinner place on the banks of the Ganges got sick too. So hope though scallops are in good shape (I love scallops BTW). Anyhoo, have a good one!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/08/2013 07:07 AM, Alex Stanley wrote: Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it! Well, better than me waking up in a strange place on my 50th and puking. Nope, not in Las Vegas but Varanasi, India. Neat place, bad stomach. LOL, but also happy birthday to Alex. I spent my 50th in Amsterdam, in circumstances that I shall not repeat for fear of offending Buck's ears. But your phrase waking up in a strange place set off a memory for me of a friend who had an odd exper- ience waking up on the morning of his 25th birthday. It was such a cool story in a way that I've toyed ever since with writing a movie for which his story is the opening scene. This guy woke up hearing an odd buzzing in his ears. Opening his eyes and looking around, he found that he was lying on gravel, with a chain-link fence on one side of him, and a row of bushes on the other. The buzzing seemed to be coming from the other side of the bushes, so he raised himself up so that he could see what was causing the buzzing, and saw cars going by at high speed. He was lying on the side of a freeway. He found that somewhat curious, having no memory of how he might have ended up there. Then he looked down, and found that he was wearing a suit and tie and a new pair of shoes. This he found even more curious, because my friend was a hippie, and didn't even own a suit and tie. When he finally got it together enough to walk to the nearest exit of the freeway, he found that it was two miles away. To this day he does not know how he got there, or why. His last memories before waking up involved going out drinking with a bunch of friends in L.A., 100 miles away. So think positively. You may have awakened on your birthday puking, but at least you probably knew how you got there. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote: Happy Birthday, Alex! You're The Cream In My Coffee http://youtu.be/m-6m2CC0pPM And you bring me sunshine... http://youtu.be/ZedhoqYdfTM
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it! Ha! Glad to hear you awoke in a very good mood, Alex! And that your day is going so well. And yes, I am having NO doubt whatsoever that the sea-scallop dish will permanently be sending you over the top. How could it not be doing so? It is being a very salty aphrodisiac, like Lassi. But to make sure it works, I would recommend tying the scallops to a string, attaching the string to a ten-foot pole, and walking around with them dangling in front of you for the rest of your life. Then, you can always be seeing and appreciating your most glorious future, here and now.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Happy Birthday Alex !!! On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:06 AM, emilymae.reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.comwrote: ** HAPPY BIRTHDAY ALEX! Praise be to the filter feeders (smile, smiley face, smile, smiley face). May your 53rd year be the best ever! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Alex must be out there, buttering those babies up. Them nodules of delicate succulence. So good the aroma through FF, cat's meow and vegetarians (who eat only vegetables), say, mmm, What is that scent? It kind of smells better than the cumin perspiring Pundits in the gym. What is that smell? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g02WR0OZ0MA How in the heck did a salty lassi ever become so popular? Alex, baby. ;) Happy Birthday in the most appropriate way. ;) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it! Ha! Glad to hear you awoke in a very good mood, Alex! And that your day is going so well. And yes, I am having NO doubt whatsoever that the sea-scallop dish will permanently be sending you over the top. How could it not be doing so? It is being a very salty aphrodisiac, like Lassi. But to make sure it works, I would recommend tying the scallops to a string, attaching the string to a ten-foot pole, and walking around with them dangling in front of you for the rest of your life. Then, you can always be seeing and appreciating your most glorious future, here and now.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Alex, you're still having birthdays? Well dang. Have a superlative one.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Alex, NO running with scissors today! Just dance, anyways! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H5I6y1Qvz0feature=player_embedded --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Happy Birthday Alex !!! On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:06 AM, emilymae.reyn emilymae.reyn@...wrote: ** HAPPY BIRTHDAY ALEX! Praise be to the filter feeders (smile, smiley face, smile, smiley face). May your 53rd year be the best ever! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Oh dear Obba, a funny and interesting coincidence happened at lunch today. We had Mango Lassi !!! The first time that excellent Vegetarian Chef of ours Carlo made Lassi - at least the first time I have seen it since I started working here in March http://flic.kr/p/fqFV2L http://flic.kr/p/fqFVL1 What do you think - is this a sign of time's grace? Am I crazy? I mean I AM crazy, but am I delusional like Uncle Tantrum and Auntie Share? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:43 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@... wrote: Alex must be out there, buttering those babies up. Them nodules of delicate succulence. So good the aroma through FF, cat's meow and vegetarians (who eat only vegetables), say, mmm, What is that scent? It kind of smells better than the cumin perspiring Pundits in the gym. What is that smell? Funny you should mention the smell of scallops, because the house filling with it for hours is one specific reason why I set up a cooking area out in the greenhouse. I even smashed out a small pane of glass and mounted a 12 exhaust fan that pulls 1650 CFM. When I cook scallops under that fan, the ONLY people who smell it are the citizens of Jefferson County. In any event, the day went downhill from there. The scallops were great, but the seedless watermelon I had a couple hours later was even better. I saw that I could use 3000 US Cellular award points to get a phone upgrade a few months earlier, but the store was sold out of the Samsung Galaxy S4 and won't have more until tomorrow. Crushed and disappointed, I went to Revs and hung out with Tom and Rory and the rest of the Revs crowd, where we mutually reassured each other that yes, we are the enlightened ones. My one victory today was purchasing an 8' copper clad steel ground rod for my conductive bed sheet earthing system... a victory because it's way the hell bigger than Rory's ground rod. And, then there's tomorrow, sweet sweet sweet tomorrow, when sanity returns to FFL.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: In any event, the day went downhill from there. The scallops were great, but the seedless watermelon I had a couple hours later was even better. I saw that I could use 3000 US Cellular award points to get a phone upgrade a few months earlier, but the store was sold out of the Samsung Galaxy S4 and won't have more until tomorrow. Crushed and disappointed, I went to Revs and hung out with Tom and Rory and the rest of the Revs crowd, where we mutually reassured each other that yes, we are the enlightened ones. Ha! Reminds me of the old cold-war MAD policy -- only now it would be Mutually Assured Delusion! My one victory today was purchasing an 8' copper clad steel ground rod for my conductive bed sheet earthing system... a victory because it's way the hell bigger than Rory's ground rod. Ahh, Alex, I am most happy you are most happy that your rod is way bigger than mine! May you forever be using it in good health! And, then there's tomorrow, sweet sweet sweet tomorrow, when sanity returns to FFL. How do we define sanity, exactly -- we who apparently reassure each other we are enlightened?! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: And, then there's tomorrow, sweet sweet sweet tomorrow, when sanity returns to FFL. How do we define sanity, exactly -- we who apparently reassure each other we are enlightened?! :-) I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of behaviors I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, sanity; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But, I know it when I see it, and restricting speech with ridiculous post counts is not that.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: And, then there's tomorrow, sweet sweet sweet tomorrow, when sanity returns to FFL. How do we define sanity, exactly -- we who apparently reassure each other we are enlightened?! :-) I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of behaviors I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, sanity; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But, I know it when I see it, and restricting speech with ridiculous post counts is not that. Aha! All this is NOT That! Thanks, I had a sneaking suspicion that that that was not this that...so hum, ho hum, heigh ho, and higher go...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
What do you expect from people that take a dump, put water in a can, wipe their ass and then go make breakfast? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: On 08/08/2013 07:07 AM, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Oh, I know you did, Alex; I was just having fun, too... And of course, I meant cum in every sense, particularly the Tantric One. Whoa! It is being Thursday already! I am just now wishing a very very happy Birthday to You, sir, Sri Sri Alex Ji! Thank you! I woke up in a very good mood, which is quite the contrast with waking up on my 50th and bursting into tears, or last year being in a depressive funk. My 52nd has me up bright and early and full of delicious drip-brewed organic espresso roast coffee with Radiance Dairy cream. And, if all goes well, the sea scallop dish I'm making will be the ultimate permanent external fulfillment that finally puts an end to all craving and seeking. This time, it's gonna work! I just know it! Well, better than me waking up in a strange place on my 50th and puking. Nope, not in Las Vegas but Varanasi, India. Neat place, bad stomach. Seems the kitchen wasn't up to snuff the night before and I think a few others staying at the bed, breakfast and dinner place on the banks of the Ganges got sick too. So hope though scallops are in good shape (I love scallops BTW). Anyhoo, have a good one!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: And, then there's tomorrow, sweet sweet sweet tomorrow, when sanity returns to FFL. How do we define sanity, exactly -- we who apparently reassure each other we are enlightened?! :-) I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of behaviors I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, sanity; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But, I know it when I see it, and restricting speech with ridiculous post counts is not that. Aha! All this is NOT That! Thanks, I had a sneaking suspicion that that that was not this that...so hum, ho hum, heigh ho, and higher go... Oh great, now I have to figure out if Potter Stewart was an Advaitin or a Neo-Advaitin. Thanks a lot, Rory...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: Oh great, now I have to figure out if Potter Stewart was an Advaitin or a Neo-Advaitin. Thanks a lot, Rory... Ah, thank you, ah say, ah, ah really thank you, Alex, for elucidating the elusive source of that wonderful quote! Well, as you well know, the mills of GOD, or as some would have it, the wheels of just IS, grind slow, but they grind exceeding fine. All truth must and shall be revealed in Goddess's resplendence in the fullness of time.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote: Alex must be out there, buttering those babies up. Them nodules of delicate succulence. So good the aroma through FF, cat's meow and vegetarians (who eat only vegetables), say, mmm, What is that scent? It kind of smells better than the cumin perspiring Pundits in the gym. What is that smell? Funny you should mention the smell of scallops, because the house filling with it for hours is one specific reason why I set up a cooking area out in the greenhouse. I even smashed out a small pane of glass and mounted a 12 exhaust fan that pulls 1650 CFM. When I cook scallops under that fan, the ONLY people who smell it are the citizens of Jefferson County. In any event, the day went downhill from there. The scallops were great, but the seedless watermelon I had a couple hours later was even better. I saw that I could use 3000 US Cellular award points to get a phone upgrade a few months earlier, but the store was sold out of the Samsung Galaxy S4 and won't have more until tomorrow. Crushed and disappointed, I went to Revs and hung out with Tom and Rory and the rest of the Revs crowd, where we mutually reassured each other that yes, we are the enlightened ones. My one victory today was purchasing an 8' copper clad steel ground rod for my conductive bed sheet earthing system... a victory because it's way the hell bigger than Rory's ground rod. And, then there's tomorrow, sweet sweet sweet tomorrow, when sanity returns to FFL. I wish it was your birfday every day!!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
You must have got a corn cob stuck up your ass today - you're in such a foul and paranoid mood every time you post something to FFL. Yes, life is a bitch when you have to get up and go to work everyday. Deal with it. You don't have to live in India to get sick! 'Cyclospora from Salad is Largest Food Poisoning Outbreak Since 2010' http://tinyurl.com/lfsop3k http://tinyurl.com/lfsop3k emptybill: What do you expect from people that take a dump, put water in a can, wipe their ass and then go make breakfast?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: You must have got a corn cob stuck up your ass today - snip Smutty? Childish? Obscene and pornographic? OK, I get it, Richard, you were just kidding. Good one! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Oh my, Barry's offended. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 2:36 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day! --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com; mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@... To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
WHY? Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from rooftops? Why are you forced to share it? The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? You certainly haven't fucked off very far yet. From: Share Long sharelong60@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
*M* said at the First Symposium on the Science of Creative Intelligence at
Amherst Ma. When you find something good, you can't rest until you share it
with the world. But... nobody has to listen. If they *hear* but aren't
listening, what's one more noise?
From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
WHY?
Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from rooftops?
Why are you forced to share it?
The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
--- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@...
wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the
roof tops.
WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely
subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to
share it? From: Share Long
sharelong60@...
To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com;
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013
4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day!I love this hymn,
Buck, thanks for posting.
From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@...
To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013
10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day!When the Unified
Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Yeah. Ravi is right. (Ravi, I am listening to your very good advice, trying so hard not to post out, but I keep feeling I want to share and share and share on the coming few weeks! Total bliss like coming from a very conservative family with an early curfew until I go to college at one of the select...and get shit faced drunk and gang banged and kiss a girl for the first time and all that good stuff that will fade out after awhile then 50 posts a week will be more than enough.) I like to share my privates sometimes. Gives me feelings of self worth and attributes to my something. Just being there. Here. Like Chauncy Gardener, plant a seed, grow a little, show a little. ;) Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. I think I am up to 41. (Not men, silly. Way beyond that number) Can it be done, or will I post out with --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: WHY? Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from rooftops? Why are you forced to share it? The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
OMG dear Obba your post makes me lust err crave for some salty, sultry Lassi On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Yeah. Ravi is right. (Ravi, I am listening to your very good advice, trying so hard not to post out, but I keep feeling I want to share and share and share on the coming few weeks! Total bliss like coming from a very conservative family with an early curfew until I go to college at one of the select...and get shit faced drunk and gang banged and kiss a girl for the first time and all that good stuff that will fade out after awhile then 50 posts a week will be more than enough.) I like to share my privates sometimes. Gives me feelings of self worth and attributes to my something. Just being there. Here. Like Chauncy Gardener, plant a seed, grow a little, show a little. ;) Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. I think I am up to 41. (Not men, silly. Way beyond that number) Can it be done, or will I post out with --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: WHY? Why shouldn't private subjective states of bliss be not shouted from rooftops? Why are you forced to share it? The hilarious absurdity of Tantra Guru Barry's challenge. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote: Bhakti just can't be kept secret. You have to shout it from the roof tops. WHY? What is it about your private -- and almost certainly completely subjective -- bliss that makes you feel as if everyone has to be forced to share it? From: Share Long sharelong60@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 4:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! I love this hymn, Buck, thanks for posting. From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:11 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Om Happy Day! When the Unified Field Walked! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1nNdTyDZEs Good Night,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. And, all because one spiteful, selfish old man asked for a birthday present.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Sex Day!
On 8/7/2013 8:07 PM, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! It doesn't look very good for the unlimited post month. Newbies. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
On 08/07/2013 06:07 PM, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! You didn't graduate summa cum laude?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am combining threads because I am attempting to try and not try to post out. Opps, my bad, Ravi. You were talking about salt lassi, like I was. Sorry.) Here comes a long month. Alex, I hope you enjoy your birthday present. (Be a rebel and just don't tell Rick you lifted the curse a couple of days early. He won't notice. Be a sport, huh?) Ann has got it right. I am sure she will agree with this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a854MZF5B_c
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Ha! Good one, Alex... but of course, I only meant cum in the Latin sense, meaning with -- hence, Lassi with OM, but as a pun on Lassie come home, of course, of course. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Ha! Good one, Alex... but of course, I only meant cum in the Latin sense, meaning with -- hence, Lassi with OM, but as a pun on Lassie come home, of course, of course. But as to lower chakras, I am thinking that Lassi cum OM would just now most definitely be being a full-spectrum, fundamentally crowning experience, OM eye Goddess yes, yes, yes, coming into the presence of ... ... yes, yes, yes, you are most certainly guessing it, the Golden parachute, the thousand-petalled lotus, none other than the Giant Radiantly Luminous Jellyfish, wherein every Shiva finds his Shakti and every Shakti finds her Shiva, Ardhanarishwar, the true GRLJ-man. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am combining threads because I am attempting to try and not try to post out. Opps, my bad, Ravi. You were talking about salt lassi, like I was. Sorry.) Look dear Obba - all this of talk of sweet, salty and/or sultry Lassi isn't helping me, haven't had a Lassi for more than 3 years now and so please show some mercy on loser lovers like me. Here comes a long month. Alex, I hope you enjoy your birthday present. (Be a rebel and just don't tell Rick you lifted the curse a couple of days early. He won't notice. Be a sport, huh?) Ann has got it right. I am sure she will agree with this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a854MZF5B_c
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Alex, you know Lassie the doggy? Just in case you don't get the below guilty ridden apology. Here, let me help http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwLzSpS-JVY --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote: Ha! Good one, Alex... but of course, I only meant cum in the Latin sense, meaning with -- hence, Lassi with OM, but as a pun on Lassie come home, of course, of course. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am combining threads because I am attempting to try and not try to post out. Opps, my bad, Ravi. You were talking about salt lassi, like I was. Sorry.) Look dear Obba - all this of talk of sweet, salty and/or sultry Lassi isn't helping me, haven't had a Lassi for more than 3 years now and so please show some mercy on loser lovers like me. Here comes a long month. Alex,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann awoelflebater@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. And, all because one spiteful, selfish old man asked for a birthday present. Happy birthday to all of us from YOU!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Om Happy Day!
Alex, is this too explicit? I'm more worried about Uncle Tantrum - he's going to go ballistic since he gets his lassi at bordels mobiles de campagne On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:43 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Now, now, Kali's Pimp does not need to reveal how long he waits for the grace of time to lay it on him? My nightmare this morning, was about my needing to spend the night at a TM potluck for whatever reasons. Some picnic thing. One of the long time tater's said I can stay at his house, so I took a room. The whole way back to his place he spoke about being single and not getting any in a very long time. I listened, and smiled politely. We arrived at the home, and I was coerced to a room, which I gladly took. (Do you guys really think I am going to put my best shit on FFL Yahoo Board? LMAO. Hell no.) Anyways, this is a true nightmare, just this morning... The tater who was balding and very slender, almost too slender, but Fairfield's demographic of skinny balding grey or gray hair men are far from slim pickings. To make a long story short, the guy came into my room, claimed he had no sex for a long time and asked if I had and I stupidly told him no, and he got really close to me and well, really close and too close and I could smell a pitta imbalance odor, but it was too late. He one or two pumped chucked me, the universe was set into play..then all of a sudden, his wife comes home and looks at me like I am some kind of something or other, gives me the evil eye. I just smile an realize. OMG, I just got Kapha creamed by married tater and I am sure I was ovulating, now that I thought more. For the first time I have sex in a very long time, it was the most non enjoyable moment(s) of time, (Except the anticipation of doing it and the first and last two humps.)because now I knew there was not even a chance to get that second chance to...you know, because he pretty much lied to say he was not married, but divorced for a while, except they really were not divorced, they were practicing that open marriage thing, without the wife knowing. So Lucky for me, this was only a nightmare. I think I had it just to share with you, Ravi, Kali Pimp Style man that you are! Oh, I put my hand in the lower chakra area and it still smelled like him and then I crinkled my nose and woke up. Alex, is this too explicit? Let me know, I was only practicing for your birthday month. :) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff wrote: Feeling the privates always makes me release. I meant sharing the private feelings with others. Not the way you are thinking, just a sutra of language to get what I want. This Lassi likes it sultry. I mean salty lassi helps my digestive system. Sweet! Lassi cum OM! :-) Hey! We run a clean establishment here! There will be no discussion of the unmentionable lower chakra bodily fluids you add to your fermented dairy beverage. Honestly, the dirty filthy stuff that YOU people think of! This is what happens when there is the prospect of no limit posting. Everyone gets giddy, they start to let it all hang out just like MJ's brother. It will be anarchy I tell you. Buck will have to close his eyes, Share will be forced to watch DM 2 over and over just to stop herself from posting at every opportunity now that she doesn't have to combine responses to numerous people in one go, Barry is going to continue to write 'artform' posts that are closer to the truth than even he realizes, Judy will stick to her guns, Ravi will be tracking the abominable snowman-like pawprints of Barry that will be mucking up the place, Raunchy may celebrate with a bullseye or two or three, AZ might show up to sling his usual wad of spit and Obba is going to continue to cum and go. It is like the asylum residents have been given the promise of the key to their padded cells on Friday. God help us all. LOL - hilarious dear Ann !!! See! Taken out of context. Just because I vividly explain some enlightening experiences, everyone things I typo the come word, and then here comes, DOGGY Does Dallas at the Hot Yoga Studio, Lassie Cum OM. Mr. Rory, really? Just sharing what comes out with a limit, then no limit and all kind of privacy shit.. Ravi, WTF did you say on that other thread? (Yes, I am combining threads because I am attempting to try and not try to post out.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: OM: soma and suppleness?
He can recommend the monks show something, but individual monks will all have taken some very serious vows in regards to secrecy and thus have to decide for themselves what they will share and what they cannot. For example, in the early tests on samadhi meditators the yogis in question lived in remote hermitages and some of the yogis were reluctant to be connected to EEG or EKG's for fear it would disturb their nadis or bioenergetic channels. Consequently some refused to be wired up, despite the recommendation by HHDL. I believe it was David-Neel who actually witnessed a Lung-gompa pausing and slowly coming out of samadhi. As soon as the yogi saw David-Neel, he tried to run into the bushes to maintain his vows and secrecy. This yogi had heavy chains on his body to keep him from getting too light... For people who know where the yogic encampments are, they only allow students with higher tantric authorizations to even enter the gar (yogis encampment). On Apr 15, 2012, at 6:33 PM, sparaig wrote: Herbert Benson could only report on what he saw. THe monks he was sent to were recommended by the Dali Lama. If some group of monks was much more advanced, the Dali Lama never told him, apparently.
[FairfieldLife] Re: OM: soma and suppleness?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Apr 14, 2012, at 5:19 PM, cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: Seem to recall after a couple of days after learning to fly during my sidhis-course became so supple that could easily put my head between my knees. Have never before and after that had such a rubbery feeling in my body. Is it perchance excess (especially collective?) soma that can make one so flexible?? BTW, could being able to do padmaasana be a criterion for practicing YF? IOW, if one can't do the lotus, one shouldn't practice YF either?? Yogic flying was traditionally combined with walking or running. The monks that the Dali Lama sent Herbert Benson to when he asked about Buddhist levitation practices were actually attempting to sit in the air by getting into padmaasana from a standing position before they touched the ground. L
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: OM: soma and suppleness?
On Apr 15, 2012, at 3:59 PM, sparaig wrote: The monks that the Dali Lama sent Herbert Benson to when he asked about Buddhist levitation practices were actually attempting to sit in the air by getting into padmaasana from a standing position before they touched the ground. That’s actually just a preparatory practice AFAIK. The real novices are almost always situated in a pit at least their own height. The accomplished ones use 8 foot deep pits. When they’re able to jump out of the 8 foot deep pit, they’re able to teach others. This long jump was then integrated into a stepping forward motion which could greatly accelerate speed as they hopped from rock to rock on their long sadhanas over the vast wastes of the Tibetan plateu. In many of the old Tibetan biographies they speak of the kings yogic speed walkers who would carry messages overnight - and of course there’s the first hand witness of Ms. Alexandra David-Neel in Magic and Mystery in Tibet...the internet before the telegraph.
[FairfieldLife] Re: OM: soma and suppleness?
Herbert Benson could only report on what he saw. THe monks he was sent to were recommended by the Dali Lama. If some group of monks was much more advanced, the Dali Lama never told him, apparently. L. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote: On Apr 15, 2012, at 3:59 PM, sparaig wrote: The monks that the Dali Lama sent Herbert Benson to when he asked about Buddhist levitation practices were actually attempting to sit in the air by getting into padmaasana from a standing position before they touched the ground. That�s actually just a preparatory practice AFAIK. The real novices are almost always situated in a pit at least their own height. The accomplished ones use 8 foot deep pits. When they�re able to jump out of the 8 foot deep pit, they�re able to teach others. This long jump was then integrated into a stepping forward motion which could greatly accelerate speed as they hopped from rock to rock on their long sadhanas over the vast wastes of the Tibetan plateu. In many of the old Tibetan biographies they speak of the kings yogic speed walkers who would carry messages overnight - and of course there�s the first hand witness of Ms. Alexandra David-Neel in Magic and Mystery in Tibet...the internet before the telegraph.
[FairfieldLife] Re: OM: om in Rgveda!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@... wrote: From Rgveda pada-paaTha (Gretil): http://fiindolo.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil.htm (RV_7,76) ut | o#7747; iti | jyoti#7717; | am#7771;tam | vi#347;va-janyam | vi#347;v#257;nara#7717; | savit#257; | deva#7717; | a#347;ret | kratv#257; | dev#257;n#257;m | ajani#7779;#7789;a | cak#7779;u#7717; | #257;vi#7717; | aka#7717; | bhuvanam | vi#347;vam | u#7779;#257;#7717; // RV_7,76.1 // Fvck! Perhaps for most of us the above shows the UTF-coding or whatever. Rewriting the first words in ITRANS: ut | oM iti | jyotiH | Well, saMhitaa-paaTha of the above goes like this: udu\` jyoti\'ra\`mR^ita\'M vi\`shvaja\'nyaM vi\`shvAna\'raH savi\`tA de\`vo a\'shret | kratvA\' de\`vAnA\'majaniShTa\` chakShu\'rA\`vira\'ka\`rbhuva\'na\`M vishva\'mu\`ShAH || 7\.076\.01 Same without accents: udu jyotiramR^itaM vishvajanyaM vishvAnaraH savitA devo ashret | kratvA devAnAmajaniShTa chakShurAvirakarbhuvanaM vishvamuShAH || 7.076.01 Without the iti-stuff the pada-paaTha for 'udu...' would prolly be 'ut | u | jyotiH | The 'u' is enclitic particle, meaning according to Macdonell, 'and, also; but' and stuff We seem to recall for instance Macdonnel's pada-paaTha_s have 'um iti' instead of 'om iti'! We have no idea why the Goettingen people want to write 'om iti' instead of 'um iti'. :o
[FairfieldLife] Re: OM: guNaa guNeSu vartante?? (BG III 28)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@... wrote: This might be a nice example of how (female) prakRti functions orderly even when the draStaa (Seer = puruSa) is disconnected, or stuff (sattva-puruSayor atyantaasaMkiirNataa): http://www.kmbc.com/news/30529027/detail.html http://www.asitis.com/3/28.html Maharishi's translation, way more literal: But he who knows the truth about the divisions of the gunas and their actions, O mighty-armed, *knowing that it is the gunas which act upon the gunas*, remains unattached. tattvavittu mahaabaaho guNakarmavibhaagayoH || guNaa guNeSu vartanta iti matvaa na sajjate | (guNaaH; guNeSu vartante; iti [ vartantay-iti vartanta iti] matvaa na sajjate)
[FairfieldLife] Re: OM: naatha-s and tantra!
...and they got Olga the destroyer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOIlgnxR19wfeature=player_detailpage#t=4\ 0s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOIlgnxR19wfeature=player_detailpage#t=\ 40s http://tinyurl.com/84ghade http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOIlgnxR19wfeature=player_detailpage#t=\ 40s http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOIlgnxR19wfeature=player_detailpage#t=\ 40s Ah Pook The Destroyer / Brion Gysin's All-Purpose Bedtime Story --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogi_Swatmarama Yogi Swatmarama was a 15th and 16th century yogic sage in India. He is best known for compiling the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, which introduced the system of Hatha Yoga. Hatha Yoga focuses on purification of the body as a path that leads to purification of the mind (ha), and prana, or vital energy (tha). Gorakhnath, who was probably Swami Swatmarama's guru, belonged to a yoga sect called Nath pant. Nath sect came into existence to save the society from the misuse of tantra shashtra (black magic and sorcery).[1]
