--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One lurker's view of the feud:
I'll bet it felt good to get that off your chest. :-)
You are welcome to your opinion, even though it
seems that you are expressing it using a script
that has been thoughtfully
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If you believe similarly, that there is *ANY* situation
in which you would support mandating TM, then I suggest
that you have crossed that boundary, too.
How do you mandate not-trying?
To subscribe, send a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I stand by my original point -- ANYONE who can justify
*forcing* people to follow his or her spiritual beliefs,
for *ANY* reason, has crossed a boundary from inspired
believer into the realm of dangerous fanatic.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff no_reply@
wrote:
One lurker's view of the feud:
I'll bet it felt good to get that off your chest. :-)
You are welcome to your opinion, even though it
seems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Plus which, no spiritual beliefs, of course, are required
to practice TM, only the belief that the practice will
be beneficial. And that, of course, can't be forced
either.
You need not believe it to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[...]
Plus which, no spiritual beliefs, of course, are required
to practice TM, only the belief that the practice will
be beneficial. And that, of
on 4/16/06 10:53 PM, anon_couscous_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if they gave a war and nobody came?
A general comment -- perhaps somewhat resonant with your thought.
People have asked both Judy and
One lurker's view of the feud:
It takes two to tango.
I suspect people are trying to persuade Judy to change because she is
more rational and seems more persuadable by logical argument—the logic
being that her strategy to get Barry to change obviously hasn't worked
and alienates others.
I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy, you could just let him stew in his own juices. You don't have
to take it on. It must feel awful enough already to feel like he
does. By continuing to engage him you just absorb his stuff and it
gives him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Judy, you could just let him stew in his own juices. You don't
have
to take it on. It must feel awful enough already to feel like he
Wayback's point that people on the list don't really need you to
defend them is a good one though. Barry does his own damage to himself
through his extremism.
What if they gave a war and nobody came?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if they gave a war and nobody came?
A general comment -- perhaps somewhat resonant with your thought.
People have asked both Judy and Barry to either i) not react nor
respond to each others posts, or ii) if that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonybliss_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I admit to being amazed by the level of vitriol, venom, contempt and
bile that Barry carries and expresses towards Maharishi, TM, the
TMO, and those he identifies as being sympathetic to any aspect of
those.
13 matches
Mail list logo
