In a message dated 9/18/06 11:00:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's what you said:"Unfortunately, there are many who say they
aren't evolved enough to handle democracy and need a Saddam or that we
have no business helping these people get rid of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
I just cannot see the speech as offensive. The quotation becomes
offensive only, when it is taken out of the context of the whole
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
jstein@ writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
The situation isn't helped any by those in the West who then
point
to this logically misplaced anger and declare the angry group as
extremists and madmen.
The pope was not pointing to
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:30:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm
asking for a name and quote from someone whosays Iraqis aren't evolved
enough to handledemocracy. I gather you just made that part
up.
Oh, I've heard easy1 make that comment several times.
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:30:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm
asking for a name and quote from someone whosays Iraqis aren't evolved
enough to handledemocracy. I gather you just made that part
up.
Easy1 has made either that exact statement or one
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:33:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny, I
don't remember much arguing about invadingAfghanistan, at least not after
9/11. Kind of like the 50,000 body bags for US soldiers to take
Baghdad caused by gas and chemical attacks.I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:30:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm asking for a name and quote from someone who
says Iraqis aren't evolved enough to handle
democracy. I gather you just made that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:30:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm asking for a name and quote from someone who
says Iraqis aren't evolved enough to handle
democracy. I gather you just made that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that by
killing enough of the third world people, we can force the rest into
submission and servitude. It isn't working, nor will it.
Is this really how
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that by
killing enough of the third world people, we can force the rest into
submission and servitude.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that
by killing enough of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
Third World live or die. That's why they elect leaders
who don't care whether these people live or die and who
design and implement their global strategies
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that by
killing enough of the
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
Now I'm interested in reading it too. Know where I can find it?
Here:http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/
september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-
regensburg_en.html
Thanks!
Sal
To subscribe,
Irmeli, I'm with you on the Pope having done nothing
really wrong in this scenario, and that in fact he was
trying to spread peace, not conflict.
I think that one of the things that many people are
missing is how *medieval* this whole tempest in a
pisspot is. That is, they're missing the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
Third World live or die. That's why they elect leaders
who don't care whether these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In my opinion the pope addresses this issue in the speech relatively
tactfully by a quotation of the issue that he sees to be at the core
of the problem.
Just so we know what we're talking about here,
this is
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
rage at having been treated like the niggers of the
world for almost seven hundred years. They WON back
then, and they've been being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that by
killing enough of the third world people, we can force the rest into
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
Third World live
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
Third World live or die. That's why they elect leaders
who don't care whether these people live or die and who
design and implement their global strategies accordingly.
The emotional reactions (and overreactions) we're seeing
in the Arab
In a message dated 9/17/06 7:36:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
they
cared anything about these people in Third Worldcountries, Americans
wouldn't have allowed their leadersto have treated them the way they have,
for decades now. But they clearly *didn't*
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Gotta agree. I currently live in France, which has MORE
than its share of problems. They're *also* a remarkably
Self Important culture. But one of the things they are
NOT is apathetic.
Any culture which invented the croissant, cappucino, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
rage at having been treated like the niggers of the
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:57 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
rage at
In a message dated 9/17/06 7:59:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the Third
World live or die. That's why they elect leaders who don't care
whether these people live or die and who design and implement their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Gotta agree. I currently live in France, which has MORE
than its share of problems. They're *also* a remarkably
Self Important culture. But one of the things they
On Sep 17, 2006, at 9:13 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
At least in the major cities, many if not most of
the people you speak to *can* understand and speak
English. It's just that unless their income is
completely dependent on tips -- and sometimes even
when it is -- they WON'T converse with you in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough
to handle democracy and need a Saddam
Who has said that? Can you give us *just one* name
and quote?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:57 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
snip
So I don't think apathy is the right word to describe
the acceptance of the status quo we see in many Arab
countries. It's more that many of the people really
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 7:59:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
Third World live or die. That's why they elect leaders
who don't care
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 9:13 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
At least in the major cities, many if not most of
the people you speak to *can* understand and speak
English. It's just that unless their income is
completely
I just learned to say hi and thank you in the languages of the
different Asian communities I live with. It totally transforms my
relationships like a cultural open seseme. (sometimes I have needed
the phrase does your brother carry a gun.)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
Third World live
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just learned to say hi and thank you in the languages
of the different Asian communities I live with.
I always had good luck with the phrase, We've come
for your daughters, Chuck. When properly translated,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I just learned to say hi and thank you in the languages
of the different Asian communities I live with.
I always had good luck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
rage at having been treated like the niggers of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Gotta agree. I currently live in France, which has MORE
than its share of problems. They're *also* a remarkably
Self Important culture. But one of the things they are
NOT is apathetic. If a president of
On Sep 17, 2006, at 10:19 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
rage at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
snip
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough
to handle democracy and need a Saddam
Who has said that? Can you give us *just one*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Having a 25 hour work week (or whatever the maximum
hours the French unions have negotiated for themselves)
is NOT a basic human right, Barry.
35 hours, Shemp.
But you have the origin of this shorter work week
It totally transforms my relationships like a cultural
open seseme...
I'll have to look into this. That's the effect I
was going for with my phrase... :-)
Can I pour you another? can work.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 10:19 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
What you're seeing in the Arab
your argument appears to be that those who can glob onto more power
over others, relative to their population, will do so. No huge insight
there. The question is whether a democracy of one-person one vote is
more reflective of the will of the people than systems where some
peoples vote count 10x,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that
by
killing enough of the third world people, we can force the rest
into
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
your argument appears to be that those who can glob onto more power
over others, relative to their population, will do so.
It's not so much a globbing on to power as it is a protection
against the misuse of power
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that by
killing enough of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
your argument appears to be that those who can glob onto more power
over others, relative to their population, will do so. No huge
insight
there. The question is whether a democracy of one-person one vote
is
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
your argument appears to be that those who can glob onto more power
over others, relative to their population, will do so.
It's not so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Gotta agree. I currently live in France, which has MORE
than its share of problems. They're *also* a remarkably
Self Important culture. But one of the things they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
snip
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough
to handle
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
your argument appears to be that those who can glob onto more
power
If you can provide examples where the electoral college and senate
system (as well as jerrymandering, corrupt campaign finance and
lobbying, out-of-distric funding of local elections) etc, helps any
minorities in the US in substantive and sustained ways, I would give
your arguments more credence
On Sep 17, 2006, at 12:05 PM, new.morning wrote:
If you can provide examples where the electoral college and senate
system (as well as jerrymandering, corrupt campaign finance and
lobbying, out-of-distric funding of local elections) etc, helps any
minorities in the US in substantive and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 12:05 PM, new.morning wrote:
If you can provide examples where the electoral college and
senate
system (as well as jerrymandering, corrupt campaign finance and
lobbying, out-of-distric
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you can provide examples where the electoral college and senate
system (as well as jerrymandering, corrupt campaign finance and
lobbying, out-of-distric funding of local elections) etc, helps any
minorities in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you can provide examples where the electoral college and senate
system (as well as jerrymandering,
Again, I'm not a supporter of jerrymandering, but one of the most
prevalent uses of jerrymandering of the past 40
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 12:05 PM, new.morning wrote:
If you can provide examples where the electoral college and
senate
system (as well as jerrymandering, corrupt campaign finance and
lobbying, out-of-distric
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Pope's recent speech the Muslims feel so agitated about is really
very good. It is about the old historical connection Christianity in
its essence has to reason due to strong Hellenistic influences from
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
snip
In my opinion the pope addresses this issue in the speech relatively
tactfully by a quotation of the issue that he sees to be at the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just cannot see the speech as offensive. The quotation becomes
offensive only, when it is taken out of the context of the whole
speech.
The pope is quoting a Christian Byzantine Emperor, who is trying to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Imagine the wrath of Christians if a non-
Christian were to say the only new things Jesus brought
were evil and inhuman, citing, say, Jesus'
In a message dated 9/17/06 11:59:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough
to handle democracy and need a SaddamWho has
said that? Can you give us *just one* name and quote?
Strangely, I
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved
enough to handle democracy and need a SaddamWho has said that?
Can you give us *just one* nameand quote?
Yes , A democratic Senator ot
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet
those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led by those that
would never have committed to liberating Afghanistan because "no
nation has ever conquered the Afghans and we would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough
to handle democracy and need a Saddam
Who has said that? Can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led
by those that would never have committed to liberating
Afghanistan
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:13:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]com writes:
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved
enough to handle
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led
by those that would never have committed to liberating
Afghanistan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:13:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a messag
Unfortunately, there are many who say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led
by those that would never have committed to liberating Afghanistan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
jstein@ writes:
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Imagine the wrath of Christians if a non-
Christian were to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
In other words, as far as I can tell they're blasting
the Pope for knowing
I agree. It was actually a very scholarly speech,
delivered to a scholarly audience. Everything he
said was well-quoted, and attributed to the people
who said it; none of it was his ideas alone. That
said, what the Islamic community is overreacting
to is that the sources he quoted really took a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. It was actually a very scholarly speech,
delivered to a scholarly audience. Everything he
said was well-quoted, and attributed to the people
who said it; none of it was his ideas alone. That
said, what the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. It was actually a very scholarly speech,
delivered to a scholarly audience. Everything he
said was well-quoted, and attributed to the people
who said it; none of it was his ideas alone. That
said, what the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
In other words, as far as I can tell they're blasting
the Pope for knowing more about the history of their
religion than they do.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
In other words, as far as I can tell they're blasting
the Pope for knowing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
In
84 matches
Mail list logo