--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > solution: put all the homes on stilts the way I see those
> > Vietnamese villages do it on the Discovery Channel...
>
> The NY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Y'all
> >
> > Is the "Y'all" in deference
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > solution: put all the homes on stilts the way I see those
> > Vietnamese villages do it on the Discovery Channel...
>
> The NY
authfriend wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Ports yes. City, no.
>>
>>
>
>You have to have a city for the people who work
>in the port industries, the article says.
>
>
>
But it doesn't have to be in the port. I'm not saying its poss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> solution: put all the homes on stilts the way I see those
> Vietnamese villages do it on the Discovery Channel...
The NY Times had three op-ed pieces yesterday
suggesting various solutions to the problem.
One of '
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Y'all
>
> Is the "Y'all" in deference to the southern culture of Louisiana?
Sort of. More a matter of picking up a useful
and co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The geopolitical strategy article I posted here that Judy refers to
> pointed out that you can't have a port without a city. You need
> the whole infrastructure of gas station attendants and car
mechanics
> and bakers, an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Ports yes. City, no.
>
> You have to have a city for the people who work
> in the port industries, the article says.
Why not just have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Y'all
Is the "Y'all" in deference to the southern culture of Louisiana?
>really should read the article Cliff posted
> here a day or two ago explaining why we must have
> a city where New Orleans is. Not rebu
The geopolitical strategy article I posted here that Judy refers to
pointed out that you can't have a port without a city. You need
the whole infrastructure of gas station attendants and car mechanics
and bakers, and bartenders, and real estate brokers, etc., etc.
Due to its geographic location
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ports yes. City, no. I also think it is nuts to have a city where
San
> Francisco is and I live in the Bay Area. It should be warehouses
and
> docks. That wouldn't be pretty but so aren't skyscrapers swaying in
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ports yes. City, no.
You have to have a city for the people who work
in the port industries, the article says.
I also think it is nuts to have a city where San
> Francisco is and I live in the Bay Area. It should b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Why?
> by Robert Anderson
Because New Orleans is part of themost important port in the USA and
the USA can't survive without it.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fa
Ports yes. City, no. I also think it is nuts to have a city where San
Francisco is and I live in the Bay Area. It should be warehouses and
docks. That wouldn't be pretty but so aren't skyscrapers swaying in a
7.0 earthquake.
authfriend wrote:
>Y'all really should read the article Cliff p
Y'all really should read the article Cliff posted
here a day or two ago explaining why we must have
a city where New Orleans is. Not rebuilding it
isn't an option.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because much of that land is probably owned by Republican
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Because much of that land is probably owned by Republican
property
> >>owners who will lose their shirts an
shempmcgurk wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Because much of that land is probably owned by Republican property
>>owners who will lose their shirts and whine like babies if they
>>
>>
>are told
>
>
>>they can't rebuild there.
>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because much of that land is probably owned by Republican property
> owners who will lose their shirts and whine like babies if they
are told
> they can't rebuild there.
...and which study are you citing that shows th
18 matches
Mail list logo
