--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > And Judy's an old windbag who doesn't understand
> > > that her defintion of 'dishonesty' is 'anything
> > > that'll allow me to argue with someone in public.'
> > > No *wonder* nobody really cares. :-)
> >
> > A
> > And Judy's an old windbag who doesn't understand
> > that her defintion of 'dishonesty' is 'anything
> > that'll allow me to argue with someone in public.'
> > No *wonder* nobody really cares. :-)
>
> Actually I much prefer discussion to argument.
> But discussion with someone who is consiste
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > When did the CIA get forbidden to dabble in domestic affairs?
> > Was it before Kennedy or after?
>
> The CIA has *always* been forb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "aut
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authf
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When did the CIA get forbidden to dabble in domestic affairs?
> Was it before Kennedy or after?
The CIA has *always* been forbidden to work on investi-
gations that are centered within the United States. It's
part of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Except that, as I noted a few posts back, vi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
[...]
> If this were the late '70s or early '80s, wouldn't ya think that the
> TMO would be distancing themselves from such an "artiste"?
>
> Now don't get me wrong; I LOVED "Mulholland Drive" and especially
> the Lesbian scenes (hey, who does
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Except that, as I noted a few posts back, virtually
> > everyone who wasn't explicitly aligned with the U.S.
> > government suspe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why are you obsessed with Barry?
>
> I'm not. However, his recent acting out has gotten under my skin a
> bit, so you could s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, BTW, note how carefully Barry avo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why are you obsessed with Barry?
>
> Barry is cute with milky-white skin and silky-smooth buttocks.
Shemp obviously has unau
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > Barry has a bee under his bonnet on this i
--- shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why are you obsessed with Barry?
>
>
> Barry is cute with milky-white skin and silky-smooth
> buttocks.
Ahhh... what is he wearing tonight?
>
>
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 12/27/05 4:13 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> More specifically, he was in favor of sending as many blacks as
> > possible to
> >> Viet Nam. He said the karma of that war was between the blac
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, BTW, note how carefully Ba
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Why are you obsessed with Barry?
I'm not. However, his recent acting out has gotten under my skin a
bit, so you could say I'm abscessed with Barry. :-)
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[E
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh, BTW, note how carefully Barry avoided my point.
>
>
> Nobody really cares, Judy.
And that's why things are in such a me
on 12/27/05 4:13 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> More specifically, he was in favor of sending as many blacks as
> possible to
>> Viet Nam. He said the karma of that war was between the blacks and
> the
>> Chinese.
>>
>
> Really? Where did you hear this?
He told Curly Smith, a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Why are you obsessed with Barry?
Barry is cute with milky-white skin and silky-smooth buttocks.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 12/27/05 3:02 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> on 12/27/05 1:34 PM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTE
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Barry has a bee under his bonnet on this issue because
> > it gives him yet another opportunity to denigrate the
> > TMO and its T
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But, I still think the more interesting question is why merely
> > discussing this topic is such a bee under Barry's bonnet.
>
Why are you obsessed with Barry?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
on 12/27/05 3:02 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> on 12/27/05 1:34 PM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> Related issues:
>>> Why MMY hated Carter and blamed him for spying, but lo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 12/27/05 1:34 PM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Related issues:
> > Why MMY hated Carter and blamed him for spying, but loved Reagan.
>
> And Nixon.
>
Remember also that MMY was a supporte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But, I still think the more interesting question is why merely
> > discussing this topic is such a bee under Barry's bonnet.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Oh, BTW, note how carefully Barry avoided my point.
Nobody really cares, Judy.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "a
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> I'm just saying that people would *like* to believe
> it was true because that might suggest that what
> they were involved with back then (TM) was more
> important than it really was.
I believe it because the U.S. government has demonstrated
itself to be more intrusi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > But, I still think the more inter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But, I still think the more interesting question is why merely
> > discussing this topic is such a bee under Barry's bonnet.
>
on 12/27/05 1:34 PM, markmeredith2002 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Related issues:
> Why MMY hated Carter and blamed him for spying, but loved Reagan.
And Nixon.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But, I still think the more interesting question is why merely
> discussing this topic is such a bee under Barry's bonnet.
It's not, actually. I just find it interesting that
Shemp is the only one here who is add
Oh, BTW, note how carefully Barry avoided my point.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Except that, as I noted a few posts back, virtually
> > everyone who wasn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Except that, as I noted a few posts back, virtually
> > everyone who wasn't explicitly aligned with the U.S.
> > government suspe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 12/27/05 12:45 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Honestly, I think Barry should reflect the internal dynamic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, but this is such bullshit I have
> > to speak up. Anyone who was an activist back
> > in the late 60s and early 7
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, but this is such bullshit I have
> > to speak up. Anyone who was an activist back
> > in the late 60s and early 70s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry, but this is such bullshit I have
> to speak up. Anyone who was an activist back
> in the late 60s and early 70s might have
> suspected that *some* US government agency
> was monitoring their efforts, but al
on 12/27/05 12:45 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Honestly, I think Barry should reflect the internal dynamic that
>> causes him to lash out at a calm and rational discussion of TMO
>> history tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Except that, as I noted a few posts back, virtually
> > everyone who wasn't explicitly aligned with the U.S.
> > government suspe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Honestly, I think Barry should r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Honestly, I think Barry should reflect the internal dynamic that
> > causes him to lash out at a calm and rational discussion o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Honestly, I think Barry should re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Except that, as I noted a few posts back, virtually
> everyone who wasn't explicitly aligned with the U.S.
> government suspected the CIA was spying on them.
>
> It didn't have anything to do with wanting to believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Honestly, I think Barry should reflect the internal dynamic that
> > causes him to lash out at a calm and rational discussion o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Honestly, I think Barry should reflect the internal dynamic that
> causes him to lash out at a calm and rational discussion of TMO
> history that may or may not have basis in fact.
Wanting to continue to believe t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
>
> > > How important we must be that the CIA and the KGB bothered with
> > > our little spiritual group...I guess we must have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > > How important we must be that the CIA and the KGB bothered with
> > > our little spiritual group...I guess we must have be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How important we must be that the CIA and the KGB bothered with
> > our little spiritual group...I guess we must have been on to
> > something SO earth-shattering that these organisations took an
> > interest in us
51 matches
Mail list logo
