[FairfieldLife] Science and spirituality...

2016-10-10 Thread he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]


 Svaamii Mukundaananda* at Stanford University:
 

 Stanford University - Science and Spirituality Part 1 of 3 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdOVadhs9pg

 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdOVadhs9pg 
 
 Stanford University - Science and Spirituality Part 1 of... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdOVadhs9pg Swamiji was at Stanford University 
on September 30th, 2011 (Friday) to deliver an enlightening talk on the topic 
of "Science and Spirituality". The lectur...
 
 
 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdOVadhs9pg 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 * Bliss (aananda) of the giver (-da) of Liberation (muku[m - sic?] = Vishnu?)


[FairfieldLife] Science and Spirituality and Maharishi:

2014-05-03 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Observation, Hypothesis, Test;
 Scientific Process.. .
 
 
 When you get things laid out in time series of publication to look at it 
becomes remarkable what Maharishi was doing all along going way back.  
 
 
 There was quite a lot of scientific process (advancement too) which got 
specifically propelled by Maharishi all through the years and decades. 
Constantly. Quite fairly this is something that distinguishes Maharishi's 
spiritual teaching. 
 
 
 Observe, hypothesize, test. The science was actually driving larger policy 
that was initiated by Maharishi himself to be able to set up tests and explore 
data all along from early on. He was really quite a modern man fusing the 
ancient and modern in the science of collecting data, making hypothesis and 
testing as process of science on the spiritual; in making hypothesis based on 
observation in research that then drives tests and the history of the movement 
as science test is also a history of Transcendental Meditation [TM] dating from 
early in Maharishi's arrival in the West in the 1950's through the 60's, 70's, 
1980's, 90's, 00's to present. “Observe, hypothesis, test”. He really persisted 
and in culture pulled quite a coup on religion-ists and atheists alike in a 
teaching of science and spirituality.
 -Buck
 

 

 Thanks this science is an extremely important addition to the data around 
spirituality.

 -Buck in the Dome
 

 

 LEnglish5 offers:
 

  Fred Travis' article published in the New York Academy of Sciences that 
discusses the preliminary research on Cosmic Consciousness:
 
 

 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full

 

 

 Specific research on pure consciousness discussed in that paper:
 

 Breath Suspension During the Transcendental Meditation Technique 
http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/content/44/2/133.full.pdf
 

 Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Respiratory Suspension Periods Occurring 
During the Practice of the Transcendental Meditation Program 
 http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/content/46/3/267.full.pdf
 

 Autonomic patterns during respiratory suspensions: Possible markers of 
Transcendental Consciousness 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/transcendental-consciousness.pdf
 

 

 

 Correlates of stabilization of pure consciousness, aka Cosmic Consciousenss 
-the preliminary stage of enlightenment in TM-theory:

 

  Psychological 
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf
 physiological 

 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf

 

 

 

 L




 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 I have this idea kicking around in my head to try to interview Sam Harris, or 
someone like him. An intelligent atheist, as I understand him. I’d want to read 
all his books first, and then hash out the likely points of discussion with you 
beforehand. We could do it on FFL. My perspective is very SCI-like – that 
intelligence is omnipresent, all-pervading, and obvious if one looks closely 
enough. I’m interviewing a guy named Bernardo Kastrup in a couple of months who 
has written a book called “Why Materialism is Baloney”, but it would be fun to 
interview an intelligent materialist, if that’s what Harris is, and see if we 
could find any common ground. What do you think?









[FairfieldLife] Science vs. Spirituality - Chopra and Mlodinow

2011-10-01 Thread turquoiseb
As I've said before, Deepak Chopra was long after my 
time in the TMO, and I've never gotten the impression 
from anything I've read by him that he's terribly bright, 
so I have zero interest in watching this upcoming sales 
campaign for their new book being billed as a debate. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/29/science-vs-spirituality-war-of-the-worldviews_n_987121.html

But many here may want to watch (or even pre-submit ques-
tions), because according to the Huffpost teaser blurb, 
Some of the issues that Chopra and Mlodinow will be 
discussing include [with my comments interspersed]: 

* How did the universe emerge? [Why oh why does everyone 
engaged in these silly debates, on either the science side 
or the religious side, assume that the universe *did* 
emerge -- can't they even *conceive* of an eternal, 
never-created universe? Sounds like limited thinking to me.] 

* What is the nature of time? [Too precious to waste any
of it listening to these guys.] 

* What is life? [A glossy magazine published 1932-2000.]

* Did Darwin go wrong? [Certainly no worse than anyone
who has the hubris to suggest that anyone, anywhere is
wrong.]

* What makes us human? [Being willing to settle for self-
styled experts telling us shit instead of figuring it
out for ourselves.]

* What is the connection between mind and brain? [As if
they knew, either of them. As if anyone knows.]

* Is God an illusion? [Not at all. Illusions have more
substance.]