On 12/6/2014 10:12 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
Buck, a common definition of the word insanity is "doing the same
thing over and over again and expecting it to come out differently".
This phrase has been attributed to various people such as Benjamin
Franklin and Albert Einstein. However, whoever wrote it, it does seem
to apply to your clinical case as your desire to alter the character
of Fairfield Life has failed 100% of the time. A clear demonstration
of the *total lack of support of natural law*. You could devote your
time to a more worthy cause, anything that might have a slim chance of
success, such as saving frogs from extinction.
>
Non sequitur.
>
By the way, most of us here are experiencing a lot of silence, so we
do not need to stifle Fairfield Life in order to get some. Go over to
The Peaked and you should experience some silence over there as you
would likely have to hold your tongue. Here it is freedom of ideas,
freedom of expression to a very large degree, freedom to be sceptical
and questioning, freedom to test ideas and see if they hold up under
scrutiny. You want to be like Joseph Stalin. He underwent training as
a priest for half a decade, so he was well prepared to enforce lack of
dissent when he came to power in Russia. Saddam Hussein idolized
Joseph Stalin too. Do you really want to be like these guys?.
>
Why don't we just get Barry to send in the cops and rough Buck up a bit?
The Dutch police are much rougher than U.S. cops, since they learned
their tactics from Adolph. Failing that, Barry could report Buck to the
Fairfield police - that should be a real thought-stopper! Even just the
threat of calling in the feds might shut Buck up: it seems to have
worked well when Barry called in Interpol on Raunchy for posting a
satire in response to Barry posting a smut-words, and starting a button
pushing contest.
>
Congress shall *make no law* respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or *abridging
the freedom of speech*, or *of the press*; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances.
Those are basically the rules under which Fairfield Life conducts is
business.
>
The basic rules under which FairfiledLife operates are the rules Rick
Archer made when this group was founded. I can't think of a single rule
that Buck has broken. Correctme if I am mistaken. So,let's review a few
of those rules:
>
*Yahoo FairfieldLife Guidelines by Rick Archer *
1) /This group has long maintained a thoughtful and considerate tone.
Please refrain from personal attacks, insults and excessive venting.
"Speak the truth that is sweet" is a worthy aspiration. If angry, take
some time to gain composure before writing or pushing the send button./
4) /Parties who feel aggrieved by statements within the forum are also
free to contact the moderators directly and provide justification as to
why they believe content to be libelous. If circumstances warrant, steps
will be taken to removing the offending material expeditiously./
8) /Posting of "adult" material, either text or photos, or links to such
materials, is prohibited. Violation of this guideline may result in
expulsion from the group./
11) /While friendly exchange between friends is natural, try to pass on
personal messages via personal e-mail, refraining where possible from
sending personal messages to the whole list. /
>
Why then 'tis none to you; for there is nothing either good or bad,
but thinking makes it so. —Shakespeare
>
/"Omne malum nascens facile opprimitur, inveteratum fit plerumque
robustius."/ - Cicero
