RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fairfield’s Crisis of Meditating Numbers in the Dome

Bound by a conservative TM ideology evidently our conservative tru-believers don’t even believe the implications of the science or else in the policy conversations they would get out of the way of more membership and more meditation in the Domes. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fairfield’s Crisis of Meditating Numbers in the Dome

-gas-pump/id602578156> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 10:44 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fairfield’s Crisis of Meditating Numbers in the Dome People spoke to different aspects in th

RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fairfield’s Crisis of Meditating Numbers in the Dome

People spoke to different aspects in the meditating community meeting at Phoenix Rising. Some people in the line at the open microphone spoke to the collapse of the Dome numbers in their experience saying things of regret that 2,000 meditating together is way more than 200 to the effect. Those

RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Fairfield’s Crisis of Meditating Numbers in the Dome

Were these examples (e.g., people doing their own jyotish) brought up in the Phoenix Rising meeting? Rick Archer Buddha at the Gas Pump https://batgap.com r...@batgap.com Podcast From: FairfieldLife@

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield’s Crisis of Meditating Numbers in the Dome:

That could be a solution, but as the number of "Sidhas" practicing in the Domes exceed the number required for coherence in Fairfield, why did that not provide the basis for continued success in Fairfield?  If we take Kaplan's letter over a decade ago at face value, it would seem Maharishi did n