RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
Sorry, I should have said except for Share, since she is herself a poseur. Share wrote: I am on FFL and I do have doubts that turq is a poseur. Just to answer Judy's assertion that not anyone on FFL doubts that he has membership in that category. On Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Barry wrote: Barry wrote: Thank you, merudanda. Made my day. Robert just nails it. Those who have never been able to create anything in their lives look at the old writer and see nothing but a poseur. Robert sees holiness. There are old writers and old writers. Only some of them are holy; the rest are poseurs. It was easier than I thought it would be to get you to put on a very convincing demonstration of your membership in the latter category. (Not that anyone on FFL was in doubt.) Because I'm in a jolly mood today, I'll reply to this for the fun of it. Says Barry, continuing his poseur demonstration. Did anyone watch the TED talk I posted a link to recently? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 It's really worth your 18 minutes, if you didn't. It is about memories, and how they can be edited, both by ourselves, and by others. Isn't that Judy's Whole Act -- trying to edit memories? Actually, no, no more than anyone else expressing their opinion. Barry's doing the same thing in this post. He really thinks readers here are saps, doesn't he? I just wrote a bunch of shit today because I felt happy and felt like writing. If any of you enjoyed the posts I made, and one or more of them lifted your spirits, that's just gravy. But Judy doesn't want you to remember them as lifting your spirits. She wants you to remember the way SHE sees them, as a response to HER, and as worthy only of what SHE gives them, scorn and derision. Barry's getting very, VERY confused as to which posts of his I commented on, and why. HINT: It wasn't any of the posts he refers to above. Remember now which ones they were, Barry? Barry edits his own memories such that he doesn't remember that virtually everything he criticizes others for doing is stuff that he himself does routinely. By now some of you must have figured out the formula. - First, pretend to be the authority in matters such as this, whatever this may be this time. - Second, pretend to know what the person you're ragging on was thinking and feeling as they wrote whatever she's ragging on. - Third, pretend that everyone already agrees with you. Do this enough times, and science tells us that some of the weak-willed ones *will* agree with you. Yup, that's what Barry's hoping when he does what he attributes to me above. He doesn't just accuse his critics of doing things he has done, he accuses them of doing what he's doing as he makes his accusations. It's really quite remarkable. When he goes on one of these rants, he is actually describing himself and just changing the names and pronouns. And he doesn't realize it. That's how little self-knowledge he has. The three items he lists above are not only the formula he uses, they're the formula he's using to tell you what my purported formula is.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
When engaged in one of these self-examination processes, remember that a clear conscience is frequently symptomatic of a flawed memory. On 10/27/2013 9:44 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Barry wrote: Barry wrote: Thank you, merudanda. Made my day. Robert just nails it. Those who have never been able to create anything in their lives look at the old writer and see nothing but a poseur. Robert sees holiness. There are old writers and old writers. Only some of them are holy; the rest are poseurs. It was easier than I thought it would be to get you to put on a very convincing demonstration of your membership in the latter category. (Not that anyone on FFL was in doubt.) Because I'm in a jolly mood today, I'll reply to this for the fun of it. Says Barry, continuing his poseur demonstration. Did anyone watch the TED talk I posted a link to recently? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 It's really worth your 18 minutes, if you didn't. It is about memories, and how they can be edited, both by ourselves, and by others. Isn't that Judy's Whole Act -- trying to edit memories? Actually, no, no more than anyone else expressing their opinion. Barry's doing the same thing in this post. He really thinks readers here are saps, doesn't he? I just wrote a bunch of shit today because I felt happy and felt like writing. If any of you enjoyed the posts I made, and one or more of them lifted your spirits, that's just gravy. But Judy doesn't want you to remember them as lifting your spirits. She wants you to remember the way SHE sees them, as a response to HER, and as worthy only of what SHE gives them, scorn and derision. Barry's getting very, VERY confused as to which posts of his I commented on, and why. HINT: It wasn't any of the posts he refers to above. Remember now which ones they were, Barry? Barry edits his own memories such that he doesn't remember that virtually everything he criticizes others for doing is stuff that he himself does routinely. By now some of you must have figured out the formula. - First, pretend to be the authority in matters such as this, whatever this may be this time. - Second, pretend to know what the person you're ragging on was thinking and feeling as they wrote whatever she's ragging on. - Third, pretend that everyone already agrees with you. Do this enough times, and science tells us that some of the weak-willed ones *will* agree with you. Yup, that's what Barry's hoping when he does what he attributes to me above. He doesn't just accuse his critics of doing things he /has done/, he accuses them of doing /what he's doing as he makes his accusations./ It's really quite remarkable. When he goes on one of these rants, he is actually describing himself and just changing the names and pronouns. /And he doesn't realize it/. That's how little self-knowledge he has. The three items he lists above are not only the formula he uses, they're the formula /he's using to tell you what/ /my purported formula is./ / / / /
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
Poseur (or poser) is a pejorative term, often used in the punk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punk_subculture, heavy metal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_subculture, hip hop http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hip_hop, and goth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goth_subculture subcultures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subculture, or the skateboarding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skateboarding and surfing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfing communities, to describe a person who copies the dress, speech, and/or mannerisms of a group or subculture, generally for attaining acceptability within the group or for popularity among various other groups, yet who is deemed not to share or understand the values or philosophy of the subculture. Wiki (already posted?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Sorry, I should have said except for Share, since she is herself a poseur. Share wrote: I am on FFL and I do have doubts that turq is a poseur. Just to answer Judy's assertion that not anyone on FFL doubts that he has membership in that category. On Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Barry wrote: Barry wrote: Thank you, merudanda. Made my day. Robert just nails it. Those who have never been able to create anything in their lives look at the old writer and see nothing but a poseur. Robert sees holiness. There are old writers and old writers. Only some of them are holy; the rest are poseurs. It was easier than I thought it would be to get you to put on a very convincing demonstration of your membership in the latter category. (Not that anyone on FFL was in doubt.) Because I'm in a jolly mood today, I'll reply to this for the fun of it. Says Barry, continuing his poseur demonstration. Did anyone watch the TED talk I posted a link to recently? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 It's really worth your 18 minutes, if you didn't. It is about memories, and how they can be edited, both by ourselves, and by others. Isn't that Judy's Whole Act -- trying to edit memories? Actually, no, no more than anyone else expressing their opinion. Barry's doing the same thing in this post. He really thinks readers here are saps, doesn't he? I just wrote a bunch of shit today because I felt happy and felt like writing. If any of you enjoyed the posts I made, and one or more of them lifted your spirits, that's just gravy. But Judy doesn't want you to remember them as lifting your spirits. She wants you to remember the way SHE sees them, as a response to HER, and as worthy only of what SHE gives them, scorn and derision. Barry's getting very, VERY confused as to which posts of his I commented on, and why. HINT: It wasn't any of the posts he refers to above. Remember now which ones they were, Barry? Barry edits his own memories such that he doesn't remember that virtually everything he criticizes others for doing is stuff that he himself does routinely. By now some of you must have figured out the formula. - First, pretend to be the authority in matters such as this, whatever this may be this time. - Second, pretend to know what the person you're ragging on was thinking and feeling as they wrote whatever she's ragging on. - Third, pretend that everyone already agrees with you. Do this enough times, and science tells us that some of the weak-willed ones *will* agree with you. Yup, that's what Barry's hoping when he does what he attributes to me above. He doesn't just accuse his critics of doing things he has done, he accuses them of doing what he's doing as he makes his accusations. It's really quite remarkable. When he goes on one of these rants, he is actually describing himself and just changing the names and pronouns. And he doesn't realize it. That's how little self-knowledge he has. The three items he lists above are not only the formula he uses, they're the formula he's using to tell you what my purported formula is.
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
Definition of poseur from the Merriam-Webster dictionary: a person who pretends to be what he or she is not: an affected or insincere person BillyG wrote: Poseur (or poser) is a pejorative term, often used in the punk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punk_subculture, heavy metal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_subculture, hip hop http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hip_hop, and goth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goth_subculture subcultures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subculture, or the skateboarding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skateboarding and surfing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfing communities, to describe a person who copies the dress, speech, and/or mannerisms of a group or subculture, generally for attaining acceptability within the group or for popularity among various other groups, yet who is deemed not to share or understand the values or philosophy of the subculture. Wiki (already posted?)
RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
Standard sly attack from a poseur. As I said earlier, Share is just as honest as Barry. Share wrote: Pondering about Judy and turq, I admit I prefer the straight forward fighting style of the latter rather than the sly fighting style of the former. On Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Sorry, I should have said except for Share, since she is herself a poseur. Share wrote: I am on FFL and I do have doubts that turq is a poseur. Just to answer Judy's assertion that not anyone on FFL doubts that he has membership in that category. On Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Barry wrote: Barry wrote: Thank you, merudanda. Made my day. Robert just nails it. Those who have never been able to create anything in their lives look at the old writer and see nothing but a poseur. Robert sees holiness. There are old writers and old writers. Only some of them are holy; the rest are poseurs. It was easier than I thought it would be to get you to put on a very convincing demonstration of your membership in the latter category. (Not that anyone on FFL was in doubt.) Because I'm in a jolly mood today, I'll reply to this for the fun of it. Says Barry, continuing his poseur demonstration. Did anyone watch the TED talk I posted a link to recently? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 It's really worth your 18 minutes, if you didn't. It is about memories, and how they can be edited, both by ourselves, and by others. Isn't that Judy's Whole Act -- trying to edit memories? Actually, no, no more than anyone else expressing their opinion. Barry's doing the same thing in this post. He really thinks readers here are saps, doesn't he? I just wrote a bunch of shit today because I felt happy and felt like writing. If any of you enjoyed the posts I made, and one or more of them lifted your spirits, that's just gravy. But Judy doesn't want you to remember them as lifting your spirits. She wants you to remember the way SHE sees them, as a response to HER, and as worthy only of what SHE gives them, scorn and derision. Barry's getting very, VERY confused as to which posts of his I commented on, and why. HINT: It wasn't any of the posts he refers to above. Remember now which ones they were, Barry? Barry edits his own memories such that he doesn't remember that virtually everything he criticizes others for doing is stuff that he himself does routinely. By now some of you must have figured out the formula. - First, pretend to be the authority in matters such as this, whatever this may be this time. - Second, pretend to know what the person you're ragging on was thinking and feeling as they wrote whatever she's ragging on. - Third, pretend that everyone already agrees with you. Do this enough times, and science tells us that some of the weak-willed ones *will* agree with you. Yup, that's what Barry's hoping when he does what he attributes to me above. He doesn't just accuse his critics of doing things he has done, he accuses them of doing what he's doing as he makes his accusations. It's really quite remarkable. When he goes on one of these rants, he is actually describing himself and just changing the names and pronouns. And he doesn't realize it. That's how little self-knowledge he has. The three items he lists above are not only the formula he uses, they're the formula he's using to tell you what my purported formula is.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
So, let's review - exactly how many times have Judy and Barry been to Fairfield to meditate inside one of the domes? On 10/27/2013 10:36 AM, wgm4u wrote: *Poseur* (or *poser*) is a pejorative term, often used in the punk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punk_subculture, heavy metal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_subculture, hip hop http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hip_hop, and goth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goth_subculture subcultures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subculture, or the skateboarding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skateboarding and surfing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfing communities, to describe a person who copies the dress, speech, and/or mannerisms of a group or subculture, generally for attaining acceptability within the group or for popularity among various other groups, yet who is deemed not to share or understand the values or philosophy of the subculture. Wiki (already posted?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: *Sorry, I should have said except for Share, since she is herself a poseur. * * Share wrote:* I am on FFL and I do have doubts that turq is a poseur. Just to answer Judy's assertion that not anyone on FFL doubts that he has membership in that category. On Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Barry wrote: Barry wrote: Thank you, merudanda. Made my day. Robert just nails it. Those who have never been able to create anything in their lives look at the old writer and see nothing but a poseur. Robert sees holiness. There are old writers and old writers. Only some of them are holy; the rest are poseurs. It was easier than I thought it would be to get you to put on a very convincing demonstration of your membership in the latter category. (Not that anyone on FFL was in doubt.) Because I'm in a jolly mood today, I'll reply to this for the fun of it. Says Barry, continuing his poseur demonstration. Did anyone watch the TED talk I posted a link to recently? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/361507 It's really worth your 18 minutes, if you didn't. It is about memories, and how they can be edited, both by ourselves, and by others. Isn't that Judy's Whole Act -- trying to edit memories? Actually, no, no more than anyone else expressing their opinion. Barry's doing the same thing in this post. He really thinks readers here are saps, doesn't he? I just wrote a bunch of shit today because I felt happy and felt like writing. If any of you enjoyed the posts I made, and one or more of them lifted your spirits, that's just gravy. But Judy doesn't want you to remember them as lifting your spirits. She wants you to remember the way SHE sees them, as a response to HER, and as worthy only of what SHE gives them, scorn and derision. Barry's getting very, VERY confused as to which posts of his I commented on, and why. HINT: It wasn't any of the posts he refers to above. Remember now which ones they were, Barry? Barry edits his own memories such that he doesn't remember that virtually everything he criticizes others for doing is stuff that he himself does routinely. By now some of you must have figured out the formula. - First, pretend to be the authority in matters such as this, whatever this may be this time. - Second, pretend to know what the person you're ragging on was thinking and feeling as they wrote whatever she's ragging on. - Third, pretend that everyone already agrees with you. Do this enough times, and science tells us that some of the weak-willed ones *will* agree with you. Yup, that's what Barry's hoping when he does what he attributes to me above. He doesn't just accuse his critics of doing things he /has done/, he accuses them of doing /what he's doing as he makes his accusations./ It's really quite remarkable. When he goes on one of these rants, he is actually describing himself and just changing the names and pronouns. /And he doesn't realize it/. That's how little self-knowledge he has. The three items he lists above are not only the formula he uses, they're the formula /he's using to tell you what/ /my purported formula is./ / / / /
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
Richard wrote: You've got to realize, Share, is that these two pundits are professionals who write for a living every day - they are not posing as uninformed seekers or aspirants just passing the time of day reading their email. My posting to FFL has nothing whatsoever to do with my profession, nor do I pretend to be a pundit; nor am I interested in proving my online subculture status, whatever that means. (What you have to realize, Share, is that Richard is a troll.)
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Rue de l#39;Esperance
So, who made you the judge of the pundits? So, you admit you're posting from your Jersey shore home office - what kind of a tax break do you get from the IRS? Don't tell me you have a computer just for posting on Sunday! And, why exactly are you advertising that you're the Author's Friend? Is that some kind of business or what? Go figure. How long does someone have to post here without being called a troll or a poser? LoL! On 10/27/2013 11:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *Richard wrote:* You've got to realize, Share, is that these two pundits are professionals who write for a living every day - they are not posing as uninformed seekers or aspirants just passing the time of day reading their email. *My posting to FFL has nothing whatsoever to do with my profession, nor do I pretend to be a pundit; nor am I interested in proving my online subculture status, whatever that means.* * * *(What you have to realize, Share, is that Richard is a troll.)*
