Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ISIS Now Has an Air Force
On 10/18/2014 6:29 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Over 5000 bombs and artillery shells with Sarin and Mustard gas found - so far. Now owned by ISIS - the compassionate, the merciful. /OT: No WMD were found in Iraq?// //http://tinyurl.com/pz5rean/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ISIS Now Has an Air Force
On 10/17/2014 7:53 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: If ISIS used WMD in Baghdad, the tenor of the US response will change in equal or greater measure. I think Obama is believing that ISIS is an Arab problem and it should be resolved by the Arab nations in the Middle East. But, so far, no Arab nations have volunteered to help Iraq out by providing troops to fight the ISIS militants. /There is not going to be any help from Arab nations because they are all Arab nations. The only criterion will be if a nation is a member of the Islamic Caliphate, or not. Every nation on the planet is the enemy if you don't support ISIS, the Sunni Islamic State Army. It's not complicated./ If the militants use WMD in the USA or any of the European countries who are members of NATO, /It's not a matter of if - it's just a matter of when. / we'll find NATO forces back in Iraq very quickly to wipe out the ISIS threat. /If anyone wanted to prevent the use of WMD they would have supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the subsequent occupation to find and destroy the WMD. Everyone knew that Saddam had stockpiles - that's why the U.S. invaded Iraq in the first place. There are no European troops on the ground in Iraq at this time, so that pretty much tells you who is going to support the U.S. goal of degrading and destroying ISIS./ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : Remember how W. and Chaney lied because there never were WMD's in Iraq? Heh Heh. Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual bombs and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They were NOT all found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein Ebola ordered US troops out of the country. Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these supplies. ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these WMD to strike Baghdad. After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ISIS Now Has an Air Force
No weapons of mass destruction have been found. - Judy Stein /Judy - I think maybe you lied to yourself too. Before the invasion, did you post any statements expressing any doubts that Saddam had WMD? If you did, maybe I missed it. Both The Times and The Post published editorials supporting the claim that Saddam had WMD. But it seems to me that it was a given, by everyone, except maybe Scott Ritter - including both Democrats and Republicans - Blix, the U.N., France, Germany, Great Britain, and U.S.A. etc., that Saddam had WMD, and everyone apparently agreed./ - Richard J. Williams, 2003 On 10/17/2014 6:47 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Remember how W. and Chaney lied because there never were WMD's in Iraq? Heh Heh. /There are stockpiles of WMD all over the Iraq countryside now in the possession of ISIS./ Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual bombs and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They were NOT all found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein Ebola ordered US troops out of the country. Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these supplies. ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these WMD to strike Baghdad. After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ISIS Now Has an Air Force
These relatively small caches of weapons are not what Bush and that other moron, used to justify the slaughter of hundreds of thousands, in Iraq. Remember, Richard, it was the scare tactic of mentioning, The Mushroom Cloud. Bush and his cronies deliberately used the specter of nuclear war to get us into Iraq. Just because the NYT and Wash Post have now tried to revise history, doesn't make it true. It was a deliberate, and still unsubstantiated LIE. No WMDs exist in Iraq, and they never have, unless the US has now transported them there. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : No weapons of mass destruction have been found. - Judy Stein Judy - I think maybe you lied to yourself too. Before the invasion, did you post any statements expressing any doubts that Saddam had WMD? If you did, maybe I missed it. Both The Times and The Post published editorials supporting the claim that Saddam had WMD. But it seems to me that it was a given, by everyone, except maybe Scott Ritter - including both Democrats and Republicans - Blix, the U.N., France, Germany, Great Britain, and U.S.A. etc., that Saddam had WMD, and everyone apparently agreed. - Richard J. Williams, 2003 On 10/17/2014 6:47 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: Remember how W. and Chaney lied because there never were WMD's in Iraq? Heh Heh. There are stockpiles of WMD all over the Iraq countryside now in the possession of ISIS. Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual bombs and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They were NOT all found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein Ebola ordered US troops out of the country. Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these supplies. ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these WMD to strike Baghdad. After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ISIS Now Has an Air Force
On 10/18/2014 10:24 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: These relatively small caches of weapons are not what Bush and that other moron, /The point is that nobody knew whether or not Saddam had WMD - almost everyone believed he did, including 99% of our U.S. congressional representatives. Almost everyone agreed on this. Any amount of chemical weapons can be used by ISIS against the Kurds, just like Saddam used against them. It only takes a small amount of mustard gas to kill thousands of people in just a few minutes.The attack on the Kurds by Iraqi forces in 1988 alone should have been enough to justify an allied invasion - Saddam crossed a red line, but nobody had the guts to stand up to him and do something about it. Go figure. / /http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack/ used to justify the slaughter of hundreds of thousands, in Iraq. /Like most reasonable people, I place the blame for millions of deaths squarely on Saddam Hussein - it has been the goal of three U.S. Presidents to unseat the government of Iraq and get rid of him - only George W. Bush had the gumption to actually do it./ Remember, Richard, it was the scare tactic of mentioning, The Mushroom Cloud. Bush and his cronies deliberately used the specter of nuclear war to get us into Iraq. Just because the NYT and Wash Post have now tried to revise history, doesn't make it true. /You may not remember but the majority of members of the U.S. Congress all agreed to use force to unseat Saddam because because they thought Saddam had hidden WMD. Everyone knew this going in because Saddam had used chemical weapons on the Kurds. The point is that nobody knew for sure if Saddam had nuclear weapons or not. That's why we went in - to find out once and for all so Saddam couldn't blackmail us anymore. /// It was a deliberate, and still unsubstantiated LIE. No WMDs exist in Iraq, and they never have, unless the US has now transported them there. /If true, then John Kerry and Hillary Clinton are liars. In fact, there are WMD stockpiles all over Iraq that were sold to Saddam by the thousands by the U.S., France, and Germany. This is a matter if record./ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : No weapons of mass destruction have been found. - Judy Stein /Judy - I think maybe you lied to yourself too. Before the invasion, did you post any statements expressing any doubts that Saddam had WMD? If you did, maybe I missed it. Both The Times and The Post published editorials supporting the claim that Saddam had WMD. But it seems to me that it was a given, by everyone, except maybe Scott Ritter - including both Democrats and Republicans - Blix, the U.N., France, Germany, Great Britain, and U.S.A. etc., that Saddam had WMD, and everyone apparently agreed./ - Richard J. Williams, 2003 On 10/17/2014 6:47 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: Remember how W. and Chaney lied because there never were WMD's in Iraq? Heh Heh. /There are stockpiles of WMD all over the Iraq countryside now in the possession of ISIS./ Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual bombs and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They were NOT all found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein Ebola ordered US troops out of the country. Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these supplies. ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these WMD to strike Baghdad. After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ISIS Now Has an Air Force
On 10/17/2014 6:47 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Remember how W. and Chaney lied because there never were WMD's in Iraq? Heh Heh. /There are stockpiles of WMD all over the Iraq countryside now in the possession of ISIS./ Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual bombs and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They were NOT all found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein Ebola ordered US troops out of the country. Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these supplies. ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these WMD to strike Baghdad. After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
