authfriend wrote:

>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>authfriend wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>The [X] administration wants government to be able to read 
>>>international computer communications – financial transactions, 
>>>personal e-mail and proprietary information sent abroad – all in 
>>>      
>>>
>the 
>  
>
>>>name of national security . . . .
>>>
>>>Granted, the Internet could be used to commit crimes, and advanced 
>>>encryption could disguise such activity. However, we do not 
>>>      
>>>
>provide 
>  
>
>>>the government with phone jacks outside our homes for unlimited 
>>>wiretaps. Why, then, should we grant government the Orwellian 
>>>capability to listen at will and in real time to our 
>>>      
>>>
>communications 
>  
>
>>>across the Web? 
>>>
>>>The protections of the Fourth Amendment are clear. The right to 
>>>protection from unlawful searches is an indivisible American 
>>>value. . . .
>>>
>>>Every medium by which people communicate can be exploited by those 
>>>with illegal or immoral intentions. Nevertheless, this is no 
>>>      
>>>
>reason 
>  
>
>>>to hand Big Brother the keys to unlock our e-mail diaries, open 
>>>      
>>>
>our 
>  
>
>>>ATM records or translate our international communications.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>John Ashcroft in 1997 about the Clinton Administration.
>>    
>>
>
>You peeked.
>
No, I sorta remembered the incident as it stirred up the EFF. I just 
wasn't clear who said it though I figured it had to be someone from the 
Bush administration. In this case I believe the Clinton was more 
interested in targeting big business.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to