Yep, it is. There could be an upset but it's a long shot given the D's rule of
proportional allocation. Clinton has been hitting most of her target numbers
for delegates. But, wouldn't it be fun if both the Republicans and Democrats
actually had contested conventions? I'm all for it.
Bernie is predicted to win California and that's a lot of delegates.
On 05/11/2016 08:27 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Objectively speaking, she is winning the pledged delegate race (not
including super delegates) by several hundred (1,716 to 1,433)
according to the
Objectively speaking, she is winning the pledged delegate race (not including
super delegates) by several hundred (1,716 to 1,433) according to the numbers I
just checked. Doesn't seem like she's losing, as of this moment.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Of
11, 2016 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?
Of course, because Billary is losing. She's not a popular candidate. She
can only win on superdelagates which is NOT right.
On 05/10/2016 07:08 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/
Of course, because Billary is losing. She's not a popular candidate.
She can only win on superdelagates which is NOT right.
On 05/10/2016 07:08 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: