Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?

2016-05-12 Thread emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Yep, it is. There could be an upset but it's a long shot given the D's rule of proportional allocation. Clinton has been hitting most of her target numbers for delegates. But, wouldn't it be fun if both the Republicans and Democrats actually had contested conventions? I'm all for it.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?

2016-05-12 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
Bernie is predicted to win California and that's a lot of delegates. On 05/11/2016 08:27 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Objectively speaking, she is winning the pledged delegate race (not including super delegates) by several hundred (1,716 to 1,433) according to the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?

2016-05-11 Thread emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Objectively speaking, she is winning the pledged delegate race (not including super delegates) by several hundred (1,716 to 1,433) according to the numbers I just checked. Doesn't seem like she's losing, as of this moment. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?

2016-05-11 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
11, 2016 6:14 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?  Of course, because Billary is losing. She's not a popular candidate.  She can only win on superdelagates which is NOT right. On 05/10/2016 07:08 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:   http://www.dailykos.com/story/

Re: [FairfieldLife] Rigged?

2016-05-11 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
Of course, because Billary is losing. She's not a popular candidate. She can only win on superdelagates which is NOT right. On 05/10/2016 07:08 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: