[Faudiostream-users] End of the coding loop : how to suffer coding back Faust code to C++ (-;

https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33=543334=7729328#p7729328 ___ Faudiostream-users mailing list Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users

Re: [Faudiostream-users] 4fb8849b833629 ("Fixup quadosc") looks wrong

Hi Bart, I am not sure I understand you, but I'll try to answer anyway ;) Please correct me. On 04/16, Bart Brouns wrote: > > Somehow the initial value of `u` got lost in the last commit to this > function: >

Re: [Faudiostream-users] 4fb8849b833629 ("Fixup quadosc") looks wrong

Hi Oleg, Thanks for your watchful eye! Somehow the initial value of `u` got lost in the last commit to this function: https://github.com/grame-cncm/faustlibraries/commit/ba34ca657a8c98efc804061c5b2e1d4f7e6bc6ff. The oscillator doesn't seem to work without it. The other changes where to

Re: [Faudiostream-users] accessing the SPI RAM on ESP32-A1S (4 MB of it anyway)

About memory access, my current understanding is that external memory access is much slower compared to internal one. So there is no perfect setup AFAICS. Stéphane > Le 16 avr. 2020 à 16:01, Gary Worsham a écrit : > > I just found a configuration option (under "make menuconfig") that

Re: [Faudiostream-users] accessing the SPI RAM on ESP32-A1S (4 MB of it anyway)

True, but for my own applications I'm not so interested in reverbs and am more interested in a few delay lines, as discrete echoes. So in that regard, having 2.5 seconds to use rather than 150 msec makes this a lot more usable. Ultimately I think I would have one of these boards as some sort of

[Faudiostream-users] accessing the SPI RAM on ESP32-A1S (4 MB of it anyway)

I just found a configuration option (under "make menuconfig") that allows you to set the external SPI RAM to be usable by malloc(). At first glance this allows configuration of delays up to about 2.5 seconds using ef.echo(), whereas previously I could only get about 150 msec. However, 3.5

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Oil can delay modulation emulation

Sorry to keep rattling on about this... #1 I realize there is no "interpolated write" possibility. #2 This isn't much different than a tape delay with wow/flutter in that there is a physical medium used for temporary storage whose speed at both write and read locations is subject to relatively

[Faudiostream-users] 4fb8849b833629 ("Fixup quadosc") looks wrong

Bart, could you explain the commit 4fb8849b833629 ("Fixup quadosc") ? It looks absolutely wrong. - It removes the 1st output (cosine), why ?? - It makes the 2nd output less precise - It makes the generated C++ code worse. Oleg.