Re: [Faudiostream-users] Triangle LFO with controllable phase?

2023-02-26 Thread Hermann Meyer
Am 27.02.23 um 00:26 schrieb Christopher Arndt: Am 27.02.23 um 00:07 schrieb Julius Smith: I think writing the triangle-wave from scratch as Dario did is the best way to go when possible. I used Dario's code for the LFO in this chorus effect I created:

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Triangle LFO with controllable phase?

2023-02-26 Thread Christopher Arndt
Am 27.02.23 um 00:07 schrieb Julius Smith: I think writing the triangle-wave from scratch as Dario did is the best way to go when possible. I used Dario's code for the LFO in this chorus effect I created: https://gist.github.com/SpotlightKid/9fe3b2638b8a1fa8b1a1d007716a45cb I wanted a

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Triangle LFO with controllable phase?

2023-02-26 Thread Julius Smith
I think writing the triangle-wave from scratch as Dario did is the best way to go when possible. Using a delay-line to add phase delay is more general, and makes sense when you can't rewrite the oscillator, but then you're probably going to want interpolated delay, such as fdelay1 or better, and

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Triangle LFO with controllable phase?

2023-02-26 Thread Christopher Arndt
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 4:05 PM Dario Sanfilippo mailto:sanfilippo.da...@gmail.com>> wrote: Here is a non-delay-based alternative (tested very briefly, but it seems to work): On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 00:28, Julius Smith mailto:julius.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote: Here is my

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Triangle LFO with controllable phase?

2023-02-26 Thread Stéphane Letz
Two different issues here: 1) first the code defines a same path for a slider and a bargraph. The old rule of « not 2 same paths in the GUI » was somewhat relaxed in this commit: https://github.com/grame-cncm/faust/commit/3437255f54ec46c565c159438bde19c3daea757c, but still not completely