Re: [Faudiostream-users] Question re. Fauck and faust2ck

2022-03-14 Thread Stéphane Letz
-std=c++11 is probably missing in the C++ command line. Stéphane > Le 14 mars 2022 à 16:13, Daniel Chapiro a écrit : > > Thanks, Romain! In that case I'll stick to faust2ck for now. > However, for those who may want to use FaucK, I found a problems with > Faust.chug (I had posted it in the

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Question re. Fauck and faust2ck

2022-03-14 Thread Romain Michon
Hi Daniel, Beside the fact that FaucK allows you to do on-the-fly compilation of Faust programs directly in ChucK, there's no real benefit in terms of using it vs. faust2ck. It's just more convenient if you need to prototype Faust programs directly in ChucK. If your Faust program is always the

Re: [Faudiostream-users] Question re. Fauck and faust2ck

2022-03-13 Thread Daniel Chapiro
Thanks, Stéphane! Also, do you know if there any advantage in using FaucK (Faust.chug) instead of faust2ck? (I don't do on-the-fly Chuck programming) On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 1:05 PM Stéphane Letz wrote: > faust2ck is not deprecated AFAICS, but is not automatically installed for > now, see:

[Faudiostream-users] Question re. Fauck and faust2ck

2022-03-11 Thread Daniel Chapiro
Hi - I have a question for people familiar w/using Faust+Chuck: In the past I had used faust2ck to combine ChucK and Faust code. Given I don't do any "on the fly" coding, is there any benefit in using FaucK instead? Although the faust2ck src is included within the faust release, "make osx" makes