Aitor Santamaria Merino wrote:
I am not interested in this project for the moment, sorry.
(sorry, I rephrase in case I was not correctly understood:
In case my previous sentences could have given the impression that I am
interested at this moment, I am not, sorry!)
Aitor
--
list
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 10:03, you wrote:
Hi all,
I want to know can I start another version of DOS than FreeDOS under
Dosemu? If answer is yes where I can find documentation on how to do it?
Why nobody don't want to help me about this matter?
--
Best regards,
Mickey [EMAIL
Hello Miroslav,
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 10:03, you wrote:
Hi all,
I want to know can I start another version of DOS than FreeDOS under
Dosemu? If answer is yes where I can find documentation on how to do it?
Why nobody don't want to help me about this matter?
Have you
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Ralf Quint wrote:
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 10:03, you wrote:
Hi all,
I want to know can I start another version of DOS than FreeDOS under
Dosemu? If answer is yes where I can find documentation on how to do it?
Why nobody don't want to help me about this
Hi, you can install MS-DOS or DR-DOS by simply copying it to a
drive where Dosemu boots from, it will autodetect the type of
kernel and simulate the right bootsector. If this does not work,
you need to follow the usual procedure and install the other DOS
by using sys - then you need to use a
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:05:56AM +0100, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi, after hours and hours of work, my XDOSEMU (http://www.dosemu.org/ or
use the more real http://dosemu.sourceforge.net/ instead) now finally
understands LOADABLE FONTS (int 0x10 API - not yet via video RAM).
Check out several
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:34:17PM -0500, George Bell wrote:
You do not need WAITASEC to scroll back in Linux: You have hotkeys
for that already enabled by default.
Which hotkeys? I'd like to know about that.
Shift + PageUp or PageDown
--
Tschuess
Andreas
--
list
Hello!
El vie, 22-11-2002 a las 18:16, Alain escribió:
...
Yes I also belive that should be an easy interface. Has anyone heard
of a DOSISH program that implement dos command in a linux system?
Alain
...
Lsh is a shell partially inspired by some command interpreters for PC
monitors (such
Hi All,
It's probably just a matter of time before there is a Linux compatible
X server for DOS. With the sources available and with the GPL someone
just has to get the spark and a little time :))
I assume that a 'basic' Xwindow server is relatively simple? At least I
recall someone writing
Hi again,
well... multiuser does not hurt if you use it singleuser. Even
newer Windows got the point that it is good not to use Word or
Outlook as root. Again, you can work as root all the time if you
want to.
Some distros give you the possibility to log you in as favourite
user at bootup and
Hi,
this WAS a problem. I remember that 8 years ago, configuring
a modem for Linux was hard. Now even DSL is just a few clicks
away with the right distro, maybe even easier than with Windows.
On the other hand, I was asked to attach a Windows 3 Pc to a LAN
and could not figure it out during a
Windoz, and to a lesser, but significant extent, Linux, shows that it is
easier to add features than it is to squash bugs. Multiuser would not
hurt were this not so; but part of the reliability of dos is that you do
only have one thing running, and if it crashes, you have a much better
idea of
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi,
well, you really ARE a pessimist.
Au Contraire, I think some distro programmers will figure it out, and
realize that: Linux comes from Unix, which is a multi-user networked
operating system. As such it sux for the single user desktop. I dont
think it would be that big a
13 matches
Mail list logo
