On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 09:43 -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think?
I love the lion. Its a great background already. With some polishing, it
can be perfect. Go for it, as far as I'm concerned.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 17:52 -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for bringing this serious matter to our attention -
Wow, way to deal with critics ! I'm impressed by your command of
ridicule.
I'm much less impressed with the beta background though. IMO it is
really overloaded
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 09:37 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
I am not sure I am reading this right, but it may be the intention for a
Desktop spin with a different target audience than the rest of the distro.
I honestly don't think that the 'rest of the distro' has any clearly
defined target
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 08:19 +, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
PRIMARY TARGET
* Free and open source software enthusiasts, developers, and
remixers.
I haven't polled the entire team about it, but I can pretty much
guarantee you that this description is _not_ what we see as the
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:24 +0100, Max Spevack wrote:
Fedora is *forced* to be a lot of things to a lot of people.
Of course. That doesn't mean that individual spins cannot have a more
clearly defined target audience.
We have a Desktop team that is trying to innovate towards its particular
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 20:33 -0400, Mairin Duffy wrote:
This is the problem - not talking about anything in particular, making
very general and vague statements without any specifics.
Well, the quality of artwork to a large extent consists of the general
feeling that it gives the users. Which
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I had thought Matthias volunteered to serve as the Desktop team
representative. He had outlined a plan here which is what the Echo folks
have been following:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-September/msg00044.html
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug. Current Fedora default
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 22:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo, 'stock
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:20 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
María Leandro wrote:
+1
2008/9/10 Samuele Storari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the vote will be totally open to the whole community.
Well, I think with a little over a week to go on the final decision, we
should maybe limit to
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 09:15 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:35 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'm here... So, I think we need to act quickly to make Echo the default
for the beta, to test the waters before F10. For Gnome, the way to do
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:09 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Heh, didn't occurred to me that I could check gtk docs :-D Thanks for
the link, seems like many of the stock icons are already in the
icon-naming-spec (though under different names). I think
icon-naming-utils create symlinks for those
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 18:22 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:35 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I can look into doing the fedora-icon-theme change.
That would be great!
I've done this now.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Hey artists,
the new gdm has a nice and easy way to turn on HighContrast / LargePrint themes.
You can see screenshots of it here:
http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/hicontrast1.png
http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/hicontrast2.png
Unfortunately, as the screenshots show, a number of the icons that
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Andreas Nilsson '[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the other icons, it seems that we have all the icons you listed,
except preferences-desktop-keyboard (and possibly session-properties,
couldn't find it) in the HighContrast-SVG folder/theme [2].
I'm not
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should that be changed to HighContrast-SVG for 2.24 then ?
I don't think we're quite ready to do that yet, and we'd probably want to
create a corresponding Inverse SVG theme before we switched. But it's not
too far
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 01:18 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Maybe they could be made more sparse for the desktop but dense for the
banners/splashes for the rest of the artwork set?
Or maybe we could have another focus besides just gear cogs?
Well here's another couple
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 11:10 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I'm not sure how to get around that, because even though I disagree that
it's KDE, that perception is not something I think we want and enough
people have made comments to that effect that I think we're going to get
that unless we
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 16:24 -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
Hi,
I'm a Red Hat developer, and completely new to this list, so forgive
my ignorance. I like the blue themes that Fedora has traditionally
chosen, but I was wondering if Fedora could have a photo for its
main background screen.
This
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 21:28 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 23:26 +0800, Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
Hi martin,
If you could help me understand our limitations ill make some more
specific mockups for you
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3021/2706976226_d9d7e58f17_o.png
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 18:14 +0800, Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
heya guys I was having a play today and built upon an old gtk theme
mockup I had. \
(svgz attached) I sure would love nodoka to render it ;-)
I didn't design it specifically for fedora but I hope someone here
finds it useful for
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 22:55 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
icon name toolused in .desktop
-
preferences-desktop-locale LanguageYes
printer PrintingYes
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 20:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Before we duplicate efforts here it is worth mentioning that Jon has
been working on a comparative study of backgrounds of various OSes.
Jon has now made his document available:
http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2008/05/30/state-of-the-art
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I also think the lock screen dialog should look closer to the gdm look.
( as in the frame/look where the user choose his login account )
One of the things that the new gdm architecture should allow us to do
(in theory, at least)
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:55 +0200, Mark wrote:
2008/4/15, Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:10:52AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons
-- that's something that's been
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 02:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Of note is the fact that the new GDM loads up the default desktop
wallpaper and it seems that a fancy wallpaper with animations and
effects would really slow down the GDM load time which is not a nice
user experience since the whole
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 04:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 02:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Of note is the fact that the new GDM loads up the default desktop
wallpaper and it seems that a fancy wallpaper with animations and
effects would
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 09:24 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Nicu Buculei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be *trivial* for the Art team to either
resurrect those
submission or gather a number of new ones (it seems our team
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 17:01 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
I edited the day wallpaper a little bit more and generated the needed
sizes (1920x1200, 1600x1200, 1280x1024, 800x480). The complete wallpaper
set can be found at my fedora people page [1], SVGs are in the same
folder but not
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 18:33 -0500, Michael Beckwith wrote:
Here's an updated version with the support for multi-resolutions.
However, I'm not sure how to handle it once we reach the static
moments. Perhaps someone with some more experience can help at those
points.
You can use size elements
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 09:59 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have now pushed support for multi-resolution backgrounds into rawhide.
The file format for this has slightly changed, to support
multi-resolution in animated backgrounds as well. The way it works is
that you
I have now pushed support for multi-resolution backgrounds into rawhide.
The file format for this has slightly changed, to support
multi-resolution in animated backgrounds as well. The way it works is
that you can use one or more size elements whereever the format
previously expected a filename:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 17:30 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have now pushed support for multi-resolution backgrounds into rawhide.
The file format for this has slightly changed, to support
multi-resolution in animated backgrounds as well. The way it works is
that you
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 15:35 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
Nicu Buculei pisze:
But that is the least relevant, the new gdm
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewGdm) change the way that
screen is themed, only the background is customizable.
Only
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 14:45 +0100, Mark wrote:
And so the list can grow and grow. Gnome is doing some awesome things
under the hood but not much that a normal user will notice, which is a
same. I'm using gnome BTW ^_^
Please, take it off this list.
Gnome development questions are best
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 17:19 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:46 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey, so we are looking at the size of test1 live cd images right now (of
course, things don't fit). One thing I notice is that some packages ship
huge
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 17:56 +0100, Mark wrote:
Great to have that functionality in Nautilus!
now i'm wondering if something like this could be implemented for GDM
as well..?? the GDM background for Fedora 8 is a .png image with a
size of: 2560 x 1600 and having that auto adjusting to the user
Hey,
for a long time now, we've had the problem that we need to install
multiple versions of the default background (regular, wide, dual-screen,
etc), and leave the user to pick the best one manually.
I finally sat down and finished a patch the I had lying around to make
the gnome desktop
Here are some examples showing why I am not a fan of replacing the
traditional focus rectangle by some newfangled glow:
http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/bad-focus1.png
What is the odd blue line there ? Yes, that is the sad remains of a
focus indicator...
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:40 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 5:51 PM, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the picture, fwiw.
Don't let Jeffs winter depression discourage you...
Tomorrow is the solstice, after that I start gaining sunlight... seven
glorious minutes
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 15:50 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 1:10 PM, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's freedom.
Here's what I see. I see people facing a way from me.. towards a
cliff face blinded by sunlight. Are they jumping up and down? Or are
they in the
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 10:30 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Michael Beckwith wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9Themes/Freedom
Interesting. I am curious how this would look in full color. Do you plan
for strong, full saturated colors?
Enjoy. I'll post more sketches of ideas
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 13:39 +0100, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
I think it's not hard to create professional looking icon theme.
Try Echo with Infinity theme - this is proffesional? I don't think so.
If it is not hard, why do you do it and come back when you have
something to show ?
If we want to have new splash screens in F8 final, we need to get them
into fedora-logos TODAY. I'm fine with putting Livio's proposal in for
gnome as-is, but I'd like to get a complete and tested kde version, too.
Matthias
___
Fedora-art-list mailing
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 08:51 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
We have great wallpaper, GDM theme, GTK and Metacity theme, GRUB
splash, great style for RHGB but we don't have GNOME splash screen.
I know it's disabled by default (dunno why), but it's not provided
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 19:23 +0200, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
Hi,
My KDE splash mockup [1] was attached to mail, which is waiting for
moderator approval and probably, like my previous messages, will not be
approved.
1| http://vameo.org/liviofiles/kde-splash.png
Looks fine to
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 14:04 +0200, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
Hi,
You've packaged many, many fonts, like DejaVu (my favourite sans-serif
family), Gentium (again - favourite, but serif), but my last favourite
- script Purisa isn't available.
Purisa was meant to be thai script font,
It is encouraging to see that you seem to be back to making Echo a great
icon theme. I wonder if we can arrange for someone who is actively
involved in the echo effort to take over maintenance of the
echo-icon-theme package, and build regular snapshots.
It is pretty obvious that David and I
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 18:56 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
the current state of things in Echo is that we derive first from
Clearlooks and then from Gnome. I'd suggest to drop the Clearlooks as
the Gnome icon theme has already 22x22 icon set and so we would improve
the current situation
I think it would be nice to make nodoka support the symbolic tooltip
color setting that has appeared in the appearance capplet in 2.20.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:39 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:00 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:50 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I think it would be nice to make nodoka support the symbolic tooltip
color setting that has appeared
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:57 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I attached a screenshot of a full user list too for reference. I can't
think of any other issues that might crop up - it seems all of the text
has sufficient space for expansion to account for translations and such.
If you see
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Can you add
gtk-icon-sizes=panel-foobar=24,24:panel-menu=24,24
to your ~/.gtkrc-2.0 and try again ? Does it look better ?
So, this helps for apps that only install a 48x48 app icon,
like gthumb, but it makes the situation
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:53 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:51 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Can you add
gtk-icon-sizes=panel-foobar=24,24:panel-menu=24,24
to your ~/.gtkrc-2.0 and try
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 21:00 +0200, Mark wrote:
If were naming the bad ones.. ^_^
What Echo needs first and foremost is sufficient coverage.
While pointing out inconsistencies on things like shadows or
colors is useful, pointing out individual icons that you consider
bad or ugly is unlikely to
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 15:47 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
As people ask on the devel list about a themed Screen Locked dialog,
here is my first attempt at it, the files should be downloaded in
/usr/share/gnome-screensaver/ (the .glade file is unmodified, identical
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 16:23 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I put together an xml file for the animation based on the format for
gnome-desktop-2.19.90-4:
http://people.redhat.com/duffy/artwork/infinity-24/00-fedora-infinity-background.xml
Nice. But I think you want a) the starttime to be
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 23:50 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi Matthias!
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 16:23 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I put together an xml file for the animation based on the format for
gnome-desktop-2.19.90-4:
http://people.redhat.com/duffy/artwork
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Yeah, the man page says:
tm_hour
The number of hours past midnight, in the range 0 to 23.
Oh I didn't know there was one! What's the name of the man page? (It
would be good to have
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 22:15 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hey, that sounds interesting, we could even make some svg based
wallpapers this way, I am however not sure what the starttime means, and
how it will work for different time zones? If I understand correctly the
starttime is time in
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
I've built redhat-artwork and libgnome packages that switch the default
theme in rawhide to Nodoka. I've also noticed some areas where the
nodoka theme engine still needs some work:
- inconsistent radio, check and toggle buttons are not drawn properly
- fill levels in ranges are not handled
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:52 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
Test 1 is out, feature freeze and Test 2 are approaching, Nodoka theme
is visually more or less complete and I noticed it moved to
CategoryApprovedFedora8 [1]. So, as the packages are already in rawhide
it's now only a matter of
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 10:56 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have started to work on updating the echo package. That might take
some time, though.
I have put a new package up at
http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/echo-icon-theme-0.3-1.20070809.fc8.noarch.rpm
It is based on the icons found
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 20:10 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
2. When is going to be released next package version based on the new
sources?
I'll try to get that done next week.
3. What about symlinked icons? Is there any page to track them? Anyone
to decide which icons will be just linked? Are
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 12:36 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:05 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
- F8 default icon theme:
Another decision we have to make is if we are comfortable with Echo
being the default for F8, and how complete we would
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:05 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
- F8 default icon theme:
Another decision we have to make is if we are comfortable with Echo
being the default for F8, and how complete we would require Echo to be
before it can be set as the default. Echo is not actually on the
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 12:12 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I would like to get assistance to modify J5 script, echo_pull[1] to
only download icons (both png and svg) from Echo development page[2].
I don't have a very good skill on
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:42 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
- Even though using a dedicated theme engine may give you the
most freedom to tweak things, but I'd consider carefully if
you really want to maintain a forked codebase long-term, if
it is just for recolorable scrollbars and
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:38 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
I've submitted a package review for the gtk-nodoka-engine package
(includes the engine, the gtk theme, the metacity theme and the
metatheme [/usr/share/themes/Nodoka/index.theme]). CC-ing maintainers
list.
Gah, I should have mentioned
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 15:50 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 15:27 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The big problem with the murrine engine is it does not honour colour
preferences like a well-behaved theme.
___
Fedora-art-list
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 15:37 +0200, Mark wrote:
My artwork is far at this moment but i`m still wondering if making
artwork will be good.. because with F7 the Redhat people decided to
make the theme internal even with alot of good theme proposals. so if
redhat plans to do this same trick again
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:10 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Do we have anyone committed to make the necessary modifications in the
theme engines? Otherwise all the effort doing the mockups isn't going
to make a difference.
Rahul
I
Some unsorted thoughts to start a discussion about artwork for F8:
- As most people will probably have noticed by now, Diana is longer with
Red Hat, and it looks unlikely that we will have a full-time artist that
can help with the artwork in time for F8.
- Personally, I'd like to explore a
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:49 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 31 mai 2007 15:27, Máirín Duffy a écrit :
Nicu Buculei wrote:
pingou wrote:
I am actually writting in a magazine for F7 and as they are going
to
give F7 DVD with it I am trying to find nice DVD pictures for it.
Here
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 12:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
A very crude way to assess a font is to upload it on
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/font/custom.htm read the glyph
count and look at the glyph matrix. A much better indicator would be the
language support coverage matrix
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:09 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
FYI the liberation fonts are nice and it's certainly worth showcasing
them but they're not Fedora 7 default fonts, since they lack extended
glyph coverage and lack hinting.
Yes, so what ? Are you going to bring this up every time
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:16 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
So using them systematically is not reflecting the project state
accurately, and it will hurt the local Fedora groups when they try to
localise Fedora marketing material and discover their language is just
not supported.
This is
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 22:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le vendredi 25 mai 2007 à 15:28 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:16 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
So using them systematically is not reflecting the project state
accurately, and it will hurt
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 02:02 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I completed svg icons fixed and published them on the wiki. The trimmed
version are
available as well on EchoIconTheme/Cleanup wiki[1] under the name
modified-svg.
Matthias Clasen, could you test them on the desktop? Only minor
quick update: I've removed the svgs from echo-icon-theme again for now,
until the problems are resolved. I've also changed the default icon
theme away from Echo for test4.
Matthias
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 14:38 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
quick update: I've removed the svgs from echo-icon-theme again for now,
until the problems are resolved. I've also changed the default icon
theme away from Echo for test4.
What did it change to?
Mist
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:12 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:00 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I wonder why Tango is not an option? Or is that upstream, choice c?
I didn't exclude anything, just point out the opinions that I have heard
so far
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 23:53 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:00 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I wonder why Tango is not an option? Or is that upstream, choice c?
I didn't exclude anything, just point out the opinions that I have
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 02:07 -0400, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Quoting Charlie Brej [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
It would be very valuable if someone could work on a little script to
get rid of the thumbnails and the illustrator-specific stuff. That
should allow us
Today I looked at shipping svgs with echo-icon-theme to improve the
coverage and avoid size gaps where we don't have hand-tuned small sizes
yet.
Unfortunately, doing this blows up the size of the tarball to 70M (after
bzipping !). Looking at some of the large (500k) icons, I notice a
couple of
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 07:46 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 04:05 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I attempted to use echo-pull[1] for updating to the newest icons. It
appears the icons are broken even thought the download is completed.
J5, could you fix the issues?
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 04:05 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I attempted to use echo-pull[1] for updating to the newest icons. It
appears the icons are broken even thought the download is completed.
J5, could you fix the issues?
Here is the patch that I needed to make echo_pull.py work with
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:40 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
It is useful to have it in the repository and see if we can get people
to experiment and be creative with it. Do you want to maintain it in
Fedora?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers.
Just thought I should point out that emblems are the only icons in an
icon theme which are guaranteed to be shown with their display names
in the ui (in the nautilus properties dialog) - thus it is a good idea
to add a .icon file for each emblem containing a suitable display name.
Of course, we
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Not very surprisingly short as expected.
Quoting Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Software Updater pup
Current Software Updater icon is based from Echo IIRC.
yes, the icon looks fine. I just didn't find it when I looked
through /usr
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:40 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/7/07, Diana Fong wrote:
2) creating the missing size variations of existing icons (Requires time
in resizing and possibly simplifying the existing icons to look its best
in smaller sizes).
Hello,
do you guys have an
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:40 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/7/07, Diana Fong wrote:
2) creating the missing size variations of existing icons (Requires time
in resizing and possibly simplifying the existing icons to look its best
in smaller sizes).
Hello,
do you guys have an
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:17 +, Leo wrote:
Seems too little time for Fedora 7 to adopt Echo.
That was not the reaction I was hoping for, but some
people always prefer to see the negative.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
94 matches
Mail list logo
