Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Frank Murphy wrote: On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 02:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Ok. We are running a informal poll in fedora-devel list to estimate interest in this. Let's see. Rahul Should I join fedora-devel list? If you want offer your comments on this, sure. Rahul

Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Frank Murphy
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 02:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Ok. We are running a informal poll in fedora-devel list to estimate > interest in this. Let's see. > > Rahul > Should I join fedora-devel list? Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __

Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Frank Murphy wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 19:44 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Well, I maintain the Xfce spin and there is just two people working on packaging Xfce. We usually sort things out in bugzilla or IRC. I discussed briefly the idea of a SIG but that hasn't happened yet. If anyone is i

Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Frank Murphy
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 19:44 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Well, I maintain the Xfce spin and there is just two people working on > packaging Xfce. We usually sort things out in bugzilla or IRC. I > discussed briefly the idea of a SIG but that hasn't happened yet. If > anyone is interested in

Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Pavel Shevchuk wrote: That's really interesting question. GNOME is maintained by general Desktop SIG, KDE is maintained by KDE SIG, but everything else is just put in repository without much additional love. Seeing how popular XFCE is on low horsepower computers like EeePC, this raises question

Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Rex Dieter
Pavel Shevchuk wrote: > shouldn't we have XFCE SIG? yep. -- Rex ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

Re: F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Pavel Shevchuk
That's really interesting question. GNOME is maintained by general Desktop SIG, KDE is maintained by KDE SIG, but everything else is just put in repository without much additional love. Seeing how popular XFCE is on low horsepower computers like EeePC, this raises question - shouldn't we have XFCE

F9 XFCE

2008-04-07 Thread Frank Murphy
Running F8-XFCE on torrent box, Has any thought being put into XFCE F9? Splash Screen, Fedora Logo on taskbar? Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http: