Re: Nodoka theme

Martin Sourada wrote: I had that though also. I'll probably ask on the test list for help with testing tomorrow and point them to the bugzilla.redhat.com for now. You might want to announce this in fedora-devel list soon. I think there would be a lot of interest in a new GNOME theme. Rah

Re: Nodoka theme

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:52 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:18 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > > > - inconsistent radio, check and toggle buttons are not drawn properly > > > > > This might be connected with check buttons positioning issue in > > firefox's menus, I not

Re: Nodoka theme

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:18 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > > - inconsistent radio, check and toggle buttons are not drawn properly > > > This might be connected with check buttons positioning issue in > firefox's menus, I noticed recently. It slipped because I don't use > firefox and in all a

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:37 +0200, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > This is now available in the repository FYI. > > Rahul Thanks for the info, seems it will be available for F7 as well (was built in koji for F7 yesterday as well). Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

Martin Sourada wrote: On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 07:50 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: Martin Sourada wrote: It's been a while since I changed my default theme to Nokoda and it seems fine. It possible to get some hard numbers, to see how it stand performance-wise compared with the current theme? Not sur

Re: Nodoka theme

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:22 +0200, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Martin Sourada wrote: > Firefox is the default browser and very popular. Expect to hear a lot of > complaints if the theme doesn't work well regardless of whether it is > the application's fault or not. > I expect. That's one of the reas

Re: Nodoka theme

On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 02:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> All of these problems can be checked with testgtk, which is included > >> in the gtk tree (you'll have to build it yourself, though). > > Can you make it available in the Fedora repository? > Rather not. It is very much code writt

Re: Nodoka theme

Martin Sourada wrote: On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 22:55 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: This might be connected with check buttons positioning issue in firefox's menus, I noticed recently. It slipped because I don't use firefox and in all applications I use it was drawed and positioned correctly. Fi

Re: Nodoka theme

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 22:55 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I've built redhat-artwork and libgnome packages that switch the default > theme in rawhide to Nodoka. I've also noticed some areas where the > nodoka theme engine still needs some work: Thanks > > - inconsisten

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 07:50 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: > Martin Sourada wrote: > It's been a while since I changed my default theme to Nokoda and it > seems fine. > It possible to get some hard numbers, to see how it stand > performance-wise compared with the current theme? Not sure what can be

Nodoka theme

I've built redhat-artwork and libgnome packages that switch the default theme in rawhide to Nodoka. I've also noticed some areas where the nodoka theme engine still needs some work: - inconsistent radio, check and toggle buttons are not drawn properly - fill levels in ranges are n

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 04:06 -0400, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Quoting Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > It is based on the icons found at people.fedoraproject.org. I had to > > quite a bit of massaging on the icon-naming-utils perl script to most of > > the same symlinks that J5's pull s

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

> I have put a new package up at > > http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/echo-icon-theme-0.3-1.20070809.fc8.noarch.rpm > > It is based on the icons found at people.fedoraproject.org. I had to > quite a bit of massaging on the icon-naming-utils perl script to most of > the same symlinks that J5's pul

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

Quoting Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is based on the icons found at people.fedoraproject.org. I had to > quite a bit of massaging on the icon-naming-utils perl script to most of > the same symlinks that J5's pull script did. Still, the package contains > some 100 .pngs less than the l

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

Martin Sourada wrote: Hi, Test 1 is out, feature freeze and Test 2 are approaching, Nodoka theme is visually more or less complete and I noticed it moved to CategoryApprovedFedora8 [1]. So, as the packages are already in rawhide it's now only a matter of enabling it by default. What you

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 10:56 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I have started to work on updating the echo package. That might take > some time, though. I have put a new package up at http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/echo-icon-theme-0.3-1.20070809.fc8.noarch.rpm It is based on the icons found a

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:56 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I can do it, but has the artwork contest ended yet ? Or are there no > other contenders for the gtk/icon theme area ? > There are no other contenders for gtk/metacity theme and actually the Nodoka theme is listed in the feature

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:52 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > Test 1 is out, feature freeze and Test 2 are approaching, Nodoka theme > is visually more or less complete and I noticed it moved to > CategoryApprovedFedora8 [1]. So, as the packages are already in rawhide &g

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

Martin Sourada wrote: Test 1 is out, feature freeze and Test 2 are approaching, Nodoka theme is visually more or less complete and I noticed it moved to CategoryApprovedFedora8 [1]. So, as the packages are already in rawhide it's now only a matter of enabling it by default. What you think?

[Nodoka Theme] Are we going to finally enable it?

Hi, Test 1 is out, feature freeze and Test 2 are approaching, Nodoka theme is visually more or less complete and I noticed it moved to CategoryApprovedFedora8 [1]. So, as the packages are already in rawhide it's now only a matter of enabling it by default. What you think? Who's the pers

Re: [Nodoka Theme] New Release (0.5.2)

On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 01:23 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Also, the gtk-nodoka-engine package was approved to fedora so you might > expect it in repos soon (probably sometime in the next week). Hm... seems the process is a little faster than I expected at first. I built all the packages today and

[Nodoka Theme] New Release (0.5.2)

Hi, I made some adjustments on my vacation based on the 0.5 version of the engine and today merged them with the changes Daniel made in version 0.5.1 and released 0.5.2. It's available[1] on the wiki[2]. I also updated the todo list to be more specific about future development: 0.6 * first

Re: Nodoka theme engine

Hi, I would agree with the statement preferring not to have gray inactive window borders; my personal preference is something utilizing bg[NORMAL] -- I think that's also what the current Clearlooks metacity does. With the gtk engine, I think I'll try to remove glazestyles -- Nodoka doesn't use

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

Il giorno mar, 17/07/2007 alle 17.32 +0200, Martin Sourada ha scritto: > It should be easy to tweak this to your liking. The metacity theme uses > gtk colours and you can customise these on the Theme Details -> Colours > page. Hi! I would suggest to keep the tab colors as they are in clearlooks

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

Martin Sourada wrote: Hi, following advice from Rahul [1] I propose a new Feature for Fedora 8 - Nodoka Theme. The Nodoka theme is currently targeted on Gnome and contains metacity theme, gtk engine, gtk theme and gnome metatheme. It is supposed to work with echo-icon-theme therefore the

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 16:30 +0200, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:19:52AM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > Comments, feedback, patches, etc. welcome. > > I'd really love to see a grey version of the theme (a la Mac OS X). Bright > color elements are distracting to me. > It sh

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

On 7/17/07, Martin Sourada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 13:01 +0200, dragoran wrote: > is this a gtk2 only theme or does it work for gtk apps too? > > ___ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > Fedora-art-list@redhat.com > http://www.redh

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:19:52AM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Comments, feedback, patches, etc. welcome. I'd really love to see a grey version of the theme (a la Mac OS X). Bright color elements are distracting to me. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 13:01 +0200, dragoran wrote: > is this a gtk2 only theme or does it work for gtk apps too? > > ___ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > Fedora-art-list@redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list GTK2 and Metaci

Re: [New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

Martin Sourada wrote: Hi, following advice from Rahul [1] I propose a new Feature for Fedora 8 - Nodoka Theme. The Nodoka theme is currently targeted on Gnome and contains metacity theme, gtk engine, gtk theme and gnome metatheme. It is supposed to work with echo-icon-theme therefore the

[New Feature Proposition]: Nodoka Theme

Hi, following advice from Rahul [1] I propose a new Feature for Fedora 8 - Nodoka Theme. The Nodoka theme is currently targeted on Gnome and contains metacity theme, gtk engine, gtk theme and gnome metatheme. It is supposed to work with echo-icon-theme therefore the metatheme package requires

Re: Nodoka theme engine

Martin Sourada wrote: Hi, I released new version of the Nodoka gtk {engine;theme}[1]. I made a new function for setting gradient and the old forwarded through this one with parameters that use murrine engine. Nodoka styling uses different parameters... So I updated most of the widgets to the new

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 15:17 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I released new version of the Nodoka gtk {engine;theme}[1]. I made a new > function for setting gradient and the old forwarded through this one > with parameters that use murrine engine. Nodoka styling uses different > parameters..

Re: Nodoka theme engine

Hi, I released new version of the Nodoka gtk {engine;theme}[1]. I made a new function for setting gradient and the old forwarded through this one with parameters that use murrine engine. Nodoka styling uses different parameters... So I updated most of the widgets to the new styling. They should be

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 13:09 +0200, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > I've been following the list for a while now (write the FWN report for > it) and just wanted to drop a quick message and say I think you're all > doing great work :D > > I've also installed and been using Nodoka for a while

Re: Nodoka theme engine

Hi, I've been following the list for a while now (write the FWN report for it) and just wanted to drop a quick message and say I think you're all doing great work :D I've also installed and been using Nodoka for a while now and really like it. I have one request/suggestion, though I'm not sure w

Re: [Nodoka Theme] Theme merged with Engine, new pkgs available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have built a x86-64 version for *gtk-nodoka-engine. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/NodokaTheme?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=gtk-nodoka-engine-0.3.1.1-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm* -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment

Re: Nodoka theme engine

package is subpackage of the metatheme package. I decided to rename the upstream packages to gtk-nodoka-engine-%{version} and nodoka-theme-gnome-%{version}. For rpms the names are same and the metacity theme package is named nodoka-metacity-theme (same scheme as in echo-icon-theme). I didn'

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:34 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Gah, I should have mentioned before; here is the usual split for > packaging themes: > > - engine goes in a separate package, together with the default theme > for that engine > > - the metacity and metatheme go in another package, I d

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:38 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > I've submitted a package review for the gtk-nodoka-engine package > (includes the engine, the gtk theme, the metacity theme and the > metatheme [/usr/share/themes/Nodoka/index.theme]). CC-ing maintainers > list. Gah, I should have mention

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:46 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Sure, if you are willing to maintain it long-term, that is fine. > In that case, we should also get it into rawhide soon, so that we don't > have to push it through package review at the last minute after deciding > on the artwork. > >

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:42 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > - Even though using a dedicated theme engine may give you the > > most freedom to tweak things, but I'd consider carefully if > > you really want to maintain a forked codebase long-term, if > > it is just for recolorable scrollbar

[Nodoka Theme] Theme merged with Engine, new pkgs available

Hi, I merged the Nodoka theme with Nodoka engine [1], so now if you install Nodoka engine, default theme is installed as well. I also packaged this new version as gtk-nodoka-engine rpm [2][3] and fixed all rpmlint warnings. I hope to submit a package request for it soon. I updated the wiki [4] as

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 07:25 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I have used your Nodoka rpms for a day now, and have to say that the > theme looks pretty reasonable and is nice to use. Of course, there > are some smaller and bigger nits to pick, otherwise I wouldn't write > this mail... > > - I strong

Re: Nodoka theme engine

I have used your Nodoka rpms for a day now, and have to say that the theme looks pretty reasonable and is nice to use. Of course, there are some smaller and bigger nits to pick, otherwise I wouldn't write this mail... - I strongly believe the blue prelight color for scrollbars is wrong and needs

Re: Nodoka theme engine

Hi, I've done some hacking on the Nodoka engine. I worked on the gradients and completely (but it can be still optionally turned on) removed the glassy effect. For now it's all I am able to do - everything more would need further studying of how it works. So the tab effect on menu is still missing

Re: Nodoka theme engine

On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 05:11 +0200, Daniel Geiger wrote: > Hi, > I have posted the initial release of the Nodoka theme engine to the > Nodoka wiki page, plus the gtkrc using it. Currently the main shifts > I have made from the Murrine theme engine are making the scrollbar > utilize

Nodoka theme engine

Hi, I have posted the initial release of the Nodoka theme engine to the Nodoka wiki page, plus the gtkrc using it. Currently the main shifts I have made from the Murrine theme engine are making the scrollbar utilize bg[PRELIGHT] in the absence of scrollbar_color property in engine

Re: Fedora Nodoka Theme Proposal

e gtkrc back down to > only 2 instances of the engine. > Also, I have made a Nodoka fork of the Murrine theme engine. With the > Nodoka theme engine, I hope to create a theme engine that has a > distinct Nodoka look, but to have the same level of configurability of > Murrine. > I

Re: Fedora Nodoka Theme Proposal

the engine. Also, I have made a Nodoka fork of the Murrine theme engine. With the Nodoka theme engine, I hope to create a theme engine that has a distinct Nodoka look, but to have the same level of configurability of Murrine. I also think the Metacity theme needs a good deal of work yet, if the

Fedora Nodoka Theme Proposal

Hi all, I put together a official, non-personal Nodoka theme wiki page [1]. You can get most info there, also if you wish to test the theme, it's the right place. RPM package is included. I made a new mockup of how I would like it to look and compared it on the wiki with the current look. I

Re: Nodoka Theme - Metacity Development

No bugs found so far, I experienced no problems with using it, so I adjusted some parameters made the code clean and "released" first stable release: 0.0.2 [1]. Hope you'll enjoy it. I also made a rpm [2], though quickly so the spec is not very good, but works all right. Thanks, Martin References

Re: Nodoka Theme - Metacity Development

Hi all, I have great news for all who wish to try the Nodoka theme... I have more or less finished the Metacity theme - the visual style is done, maybe some adjustments will be needed (depends on feedback), but the code itself needs a clean up... But it should be fully functional now, so if you

Re: Nodoka Theme - Metacity Development

> This is really nice work, Martin. A couple observations: > Thanks :) > 1. The darker color for the window title bar seems the better choice > because it doesn't drag the eye away from the content of the windows. > Hm... I never though of that, good observation. > 2. The thicker window border

Re: Nodoka Theme - Metacity Development

On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:27 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:00 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > I started on Nodoka Metacity development and as it's my first metacity > > theme I am very inexperienced in the creation process and therefore I > > made up my mind to provide eve

Re: Nodoka Theme - Metacity Development

On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:00 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I started on Nodoka Metacity development and as it's my first metacity > theme I am very inexperienced in the creation process and therefore I > made up my mind to provide every "functional" snapshot I make. I would > like if some

Nodoka Theme - Metacity Development

Hi, I started on Nodoka Metacity development and as it's my first metacity theme I am very inexperienced in the creation process and therefore I made up my mind to provide every "functional" snapshot I make. I would like if some of you test whether it works ok and also I really appreciate if someo