Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Nicu Buculei
Jeff Spaleta wrote: fedoratv.com is up and running right now. Register an account, upload some svg's and png's... file bugs :-> Which is the right place to file those bugs? I didn't manage to identify the correct component in Bugzilla... I tried to upload a video (screencast, Ogg Theora) a

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:44 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll approve it! > > Right now we have it set up so that only a handful of people can approve > content - that's Greg and myself, so far - I think. > > But, I check it pretty often, so start putting things up there - I'll > keep up.

Linuxtag 2008, Berlin, Germany

2008-01-22 Thread Gerold Kassube
* *** english Version below *** * Hallo zusammen! Wie Ihr sicher schon der Homepage des Linuxtages [1] entnommen habt, ist der Linuxtag in diesem Jahr wieder in Berlin. Er findet in der Zeit vom 28. Mai bis einschl. 31. Mai 2008 statt. Fed

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jonathan Roberts
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 09:59 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 9:23 AM, Jonathan Roberts > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we get together some kind of announcement/interview about this? > > I'm not sure if its time for that much attention. The interface is > rough, real rough. I t

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:41 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FedoraTV is working for images - I'm trying to keep that as I think it's > pretty important. I've uploaded a couple so far as tests. It's also > supporting audio - I think that's just as important, Audio only content will be HUGE. O

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Colby Hoke
Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:44 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll approve it! Right now we have it set up so that only a handful of people can approve content - that's Greg and myself, so far - I think. I forgot about that. But there is still a bug in there in r

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:23 AM, Jonathan Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we get together some kind of announcement/interview about this? I'm not sure if its time for that much attention. The interface is rough, real rough. I think I want to make damn sure that we are ready to community exactly

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:44 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll approve it! > > Right now we have it set up so that only a handful of people can approve > content - that's Greg and myself, so far - I think. I forgot about that. But there is still a bug in there in relation to My Stuff displ

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Colby Hoke
Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:18 AM, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:13 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are there any plans to communicate what Fedora TV actually is to people who didn't go to fudcon in a scalable way? That's what I'

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Martin Sourada
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 08:58 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 7:52 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks to a suggestion from Nicu Buculei, I've joined this list mostly > > out of interest in an Art Studio spin of Fedora. I've been working with > > gdk and jspaleta on get

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Colby Hoke
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Máirín Duffy wrote: Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:02 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is Fedora TV only for video? It's what I care about...but i think its for images as well. Just depends on what's actually working :-> The reason I ask is that thi

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jonathan Roberts
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 09:18 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 9:13 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there any plans to communicate what Fedora TV actually is to people > > who didn't go to fudcon in a scalable way? > > That's what I'm trying to do in this thread! >

Re: A Thought About F9 Artwork

2008-01-22 Thread Máirín Duffy
Valent Turkovic wrote: Máirín Duffy wrote: Hi Valent, Valent Turkovic wrote: Máirín Duffy wrote: Whenever we try anything that is !blue, we get a whole lot of negative feedback. People like to look at the colors far more symbolically than they should I think. ~m I don't like opensuse in

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:18 AM, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 9:13 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there any plans to communicate what Fedora TV actually is to people > > who didn't go to fudcon in a scalable way? > > That's what I'm trying to do in this thr

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:06 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason I ask is that this group in particular has been in great need > of a better solution for sharing images and their sources other than our > wiki which is slow and unreliable. Is there somewhere I can go to find > out more

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:13 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any plans to communicate what Fedora TV actually is to people > who didn't go to fudcon in a scalable way? That's what I'm trying to do in this thread! fedoratv is a codebase is pretty rough around the edges. I believe g

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Máirín Duffy
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Máirín Duffy wrote: Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:02 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is Fedora TV only for video? It's what I care about...but i think its for images as well. Just depends on what's actually working :-> The reason I ask is that thi

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Máirín Duffy wrote: Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:02 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is Fedora TV only for video? It's what I care about...but i think its for images as well. Just depends on what's actually working :-> The reason I ask is that this group in particular h

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Máirín Duffy
Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 9:02 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is Fedora TV only for video? It's what I care about...but i think its for images as well. Just depends on what's actually working :-> The reason I ask is that this group in particular has been in great need

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 9:02 AM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is Fedora TV only for video? It's what I care about...but i think its for images as well. Just depends on what's actually working :-> -jef ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-l

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Máirín Duffy
Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 7:52 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks to a suggestion from Nicu Buculei, I've joined this list mostly out of interest in an Art Studio spin of Fedora. I've been working with gdk and jspaleta on getting a Fedora repo-ready version of Kino out th

Re: Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Jan 22, 2008 7:52 AM, Colby Hoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to a suggestion from Nicu Buculei, I've joined this list mostly > out of interest in an Art Studio spin of Fedora. I've been working with > gdk and jspaleta on getting a Fedora repo-ready version of Kino out > there for people

Hi Fedora Art list!

2008-01-22 Thread Colby Hoke
Thanks to a suggestion from Nicu Buculei, I've joined this list mostly out of interest in an Art Studio spin of Fedora. I've been working with gdk and jspaleta on getting a Fedora repo-ready version of Kino out there for people to make their own videos in the Fedora world. I'm looking forward t

Round 2 Deadline is Feb 5th!! (was Re: Round 2 status?)

2008-01-22 Thread Máirín Duffy
Nicu Buculei wrote: Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: What is the final verdict? The lack of announcement of Round is worrisome. I listed the entries which follow the requirements, so those are initial entries for Round 2. Now is time for their authors and other members of the team to expand upon the