On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 23:54 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Above issues have been addressed. Here is latest version.
Apart from the 16x16 they look good. The 16x16 needs more contrast, both
the inner white outline and outline are too thin.
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 00:55 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Outline has been increased to 1,5px. For that size, I am not sure if it
is necessary to enlarge inner white outline. 16x16 should look crisp enough.
This one is definitely better. Maybe slightly darker gradient for the
16x16 might
Hi,
the last week's discussion about Echo was pretty fruitful I think and
showed that the general opinion is to not include Echo in F10 as a
default icon set. I take this as an opportunity to rethink the general
goals of echo and give some credit to various critics.
The main reason why *I* think
That also pretty much summarize our main goal, which is similar to what
tango project has, to cover various desktops with one icon set.
Well, with one style. Huge difference.
I'm still not a fan of the isometric view of the bigger icons, i think
it causes most of the noise in the icons.
Also, I
Martin Sourada a écrit :
Finally I'd like to throw some fuel for discussion (mainly on the
art-list). We are a lot criticized for inconsistencies in the projection
we use in echo. Strictly speaking we are using 3 different types of
projections and we have rules which is used where and we are
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Martin Sourada a écrit :
Finally I'd like to throw some fuel for discussion (mainly on the
art-list). We are a lot criticized for inconsistencies in the projection
we use in echo. Strictly speaking we are using 3 different types of
