Mike Chalmers wrote:
There is no way you can say the Red Hat's colors are natural if you
think about it. You can't just name any color and say it is natural
because it looks like red on trees. There is a big difference.
I really agree here. The Fedora artwork is nice sure, but it really
don't
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 03:45 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
It appears that this sub-project is suffering from an intractable
difference of opinion. In such cases, issues must be escalated to the
Fedora Project Board for a decision of how to move forward. The FPB has
asked Max to deal with
Hi John,
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 09:15 -0500, John Baer wrote:
Diana and/or Mo,
(btw, Diana is out sick today)
I noticed on the First Boot screen there is an icon to the left of the
word Welcome. Where does it come from?
I saw Nicu already replied but
1. As a rule of thumb most artwork
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 12:38 -0500, John Baer wrote:
All,
I noted from the Artwork/ReleaseGraphics document the header image for
the Anaconda Splash and Progress page are the same. IMO if the each
page called it's own header graphic (could be the same if desired) it
would allow for
:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:00 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Either way, I think it could be interesting for someone to explore
this;
perhaps write a small brief analysis of where you think it needs
improvement; perhaps fedora-art-list isn't the best place (Fedora
wise),
perhaps fedora-desktop
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 17:22 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/5/07, John Baer wrote:
I was not aware the decision on the icon set had been made. Is *echo* really
ready for prime time?
It would be nice to get a little feed back on what's going on.
True, I would like to know as well
Hi Leo!
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:39 +, Leo wrote:
How many feedbacks do you get from making Echo the default icon theme?
Uhm, so the bugzilla is public, why do you ask for things you can look
up yourself? (hint: not a lot of feedback, people normally don't file
lot of bugs for things like
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:30 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/5/07, David Zeuthen wrote:
So I think Qt/KDE, or the Fedora packaging needs to be fixed instead and
I don't think it's that hard. Chitlesh, any chance you can look into
this? Thanks.
Hello,
Surely I'll have a look
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 08:09 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
thanks for working on it. Where can I have those new icons ? on the
wiki or are they already in the development repositories ?
I'll roll a new echo-icon-theme RPM for Rawhide sometime soonish at
least before Test 2.
Also, at some point
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:40 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/7/07, Diana Fong wrote:
2) creating the missing size variations of existing icons (Requires time
in resizing and possibly simplifying the existing icons to look its best
in smaller sizes).
Hello,
do you guys have an
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 08:46 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
The entire process of rounds is not needed anymore as we've had to
concede the default release theme work to the Desktop group inside Red Hat.
Well, the thing is that someone made promises (default theme) to the
participants on this list
Hi John,
Maybe this write-up by Jef is useful for you to read
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00176.html
since I think you're confused about what open source means (you seem to
equate it with democracy). Anyway, I'm going to step out of this thread
for a
12 matches
Mail list logo
