John Baer wrote:
Nicu wrote:
I think this is excessive and unneeded branding: both for Fedora and
the
Desktop Environment.
Nicu,
Would your preference be no GDM/KDE branding but keep the fedora
branding. Or... would you prefer all branding removed?
To me, less branding would
This also would need an xfce (and others which may be inclulded with
Extras) wallpaper with each release. Also, more and more screen
sizes... it gets too complex when desktops are brought in.
--
..// seawolf //..
Ben Arnold
e-mail / msn / icq / yahoo
iamseawolf (at) gmail (dot)
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 12:00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This also would need an xfce (and others which may be inclulded with
Extras) wallpaper with each release. Also, more and more screen
sizes... it gets too complex when desktops are brought in.
Ben,
Good point. I agree this is the best
John Baer wrote:
Nicu wrote:
I think this is excessive and unneeded branding: both for Fedora and
the
Desktop Environment.
Nicu,
Would your preference be no GDM/KDE branding but keep the fedora
branding. Or... would you prefer all branding removed?
Limited or subtle Fedora branding that
Nicu wrote:
I think this is excessive and unneeded branding: both for Fedora and
the
Desktop Environment.
Nicu,
Would your preference be no GDM/KDE branding but keep the fedora
branding. Or... would you prefer all branding removed?
John
___
John Baer wrote:
In the past the wallpaper for Fedora GDM and KDE have been the same. IMO
we should pay tribute to these two successful open source projects by
branding the fedora wallpaper respectively.
Please refer to the following link.
In the past the wallpaper for Fedora GDM and KDE have been the same. IMO
we should pay tribute to these two successful open source projects by
branding the fedora wallpaper respectively.
Please refer to the following link.
