Máirín Duffy wrote:
I think rather than changing the guidelines, what we should
do is decide on one we like and just make it a standard that
is part of the guidelines and shipped in the logo packs we
send out.
I think there is too much room for error for bad gradients
so we should just say, don
- "Charlie Brej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Charlie Brej wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah. Could be possible although I will need to ammend the code a
> little.
> >> Jaroslav could you take a few more shots with the bar at different
> >> levels so I can get an idea of how it progr
- "Charlie Brej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Charlie Brej wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah. Could be possible although I will need to ammend the code a
> little.
> >> Jaroslav could you take a few more shots with the bar at different
> >> levels so I can get an idea of how it progr
Rex Dieter wrote:
Charlie Brej wrote:
Yeah. Could be possible although I will need to ammend the code a little.
Jaroslav could you take a few more shots with the bar at different
levels so I can get an idea of how it progresses?
Here's a quick-n-dirty screencast:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.
Charlie Brej wrote:
> Yeah. Could be possible although I will need to ammend the code a little.
> Jaroslav could you take a few more shots with the bar at different
> levels so I can get an idea of how it progresses?
Here's a quick-n-dirty screencast:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/SolarComet-k
Ray Strode wrote:
>> We could update it to be yours, but I don't think we should have both.
> Here are the two on a background similar to the boot screen:
>
> http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot-1.png
> http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot-2.png
screenshot 2 totally fades into the ba
Hi again,
>> >> That actually is a packaging issue, the logo used is picked from
>> >> /usr/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png.
>> > shouldn't be. we configure
>> > --with-logo=/usr/share/pixmaps/system-logo-white.png
>>
>> I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
>> It looks like t
Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
>> It looks like this on a dark blue background:
>> http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/temp/fedoralogo_white_shaded2.png
>>
>> this is what will be packaged though:
>> http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/te
Máirín Duffy wrote:
I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
It looks like this on a dark blue background:
http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/temp/fedoralogo_white_shaded2.png
this is what will be packaged though:
http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/temp/fedoralogo_white_shaded.png
Is th
Hi,
>> >> That actually is a packaging issue, the logo used is picked from
>> >> /usr/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png.
>> > shouldn't be. we configure
>> > --with-logo=/usr/share/pixmaps/system-logo-white.png
>>
>> I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
>> It looks like this on
Jaroslav Reznik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Software Engineer - Base OS Core Services Brno
Red Hat, Inc.
+420 532 294 275
- "Charlie Brej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >> - "Máirín Duffy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey Charlie,
> >>>
>
Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> That actually is a packaging issue, the logo used is picked from
>> >> /usr/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png.
>> > shouldn't be. we configure
>> > --with-logo=/usr/share/pixmaps/system-logo-white.png
>>
>> I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
Hi,
>>
>> That actually is a packaging issue, the logo used is picked from
>> /usr/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png.
> shouldn't be. we configure
> --with-logo=/usr/share/pixmaps/system-logo-white.png
I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
It looks like this on a dark blue back
Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>>
>> That actually is a packaging issue, the logo used is picked from
>> /usr/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png.
> shouldn't be. we configure
> --with-logo=/usr/share/pixmaps/system-logo-white.png
I just asked spot to add this to the fedora-logos package.
It looks like this o
Hi,
That actually is a packaging issue, the logo used is picked from
/usr/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png.
shouldn't be. we configure
--with-logo=/usr/share/pixmaps/system-logo-white.png
--Ray
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- "Máirín Duffy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Charlie,
Charlie Brej wrote:
Actually the planets are no longer there because they dont give a
clear
indication of the progress. I removed them since taking the
screenshots.
I'm just playing wi
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hey Charlie,
Charlie Brej wrote:
Actually the planets are no longer there because they dont give a clear
indication of the progress. I removed them since taking the screenshots.
I'm just playing with using the planet image but its not that good:
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~brej
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - "Máirín Duffy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey Charlie,
>>
>> Charlie Brej wrote:
>>> Actually the planets are no longer there because they dont give a
>> clear
>>> indication of the progress. I removed them since taking the
>> screenshots.
>>> I'm just playing w
Hi,
For KDE splash we have small progress bar which should evoke
comet in the space with Fedora logo. And of course there
are other small comets and stars flashing around :)
Just like Solar system ;-)
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/8924/screenshot1xq4.png
That's a cool idea.
--Ray
_
- "Máirín Duffy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Charlie,
>
> Charlie Brej wrote:
> > Actually the planets are no longer there because they dont give a
> clear
> > indication of the progress. I removed them since taking the
> screenshots.
> > I'm just playing with using the planet image but
Hey Charlie,
Charlie Brej wrote:
> Actually the planets are no longer there because they dont give a clear
> indication of the progress. I removed them since taking the screenshots.
> I'm just playing with using the planet image but its not that good:
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/progres
Hi,
> Plymouth recently got a bug report about the progress bar in the Solar
> boot plugin. The styling of the progress bar doesn't really match the
> surrounding artwork.
>
> Charlie mentioned on the bug report that this was to match the Nodoka
> theme. I think it doesn't really work because
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Ray Strode wrote:
Hi guys,
Plymouth recently got a bug report about the progress bar in the Solar
boot plugin. The styling of the progress bar doesn't really match the
surrounding artwork.
Charlie mentioned on the bug report that this was to
Hi,
If the planets are rotating around the "sun" then that should be enough.
I say skip the progress bar...
There are no planets anymore. They weren't a very intuitive indication
of boot progress.
Boot progress is pretty reliable now (thanks to Charlie), so a progress
bar is pretty important
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Ray Strode wrote:
Hi guys,
Plymouth recently got a bug report about the progress bar in the Solar
boot plugin. The styling of the progress bar doesn't really match the
surrounding artwork.
Charlie mentioned on the bug report that this was to match the Nodoka
theme. I t
Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Plymouth recently got a bug report about the progress bar in the Solar
> boot plugin. The styling of the progress bar doesn't really match the
> surrounding artwork.
>
> Charlie mentioned on the bug report that this was to match the Nodoka
> theme. I think it do
Hi guys,
Plymouth recently got a bug report about the progress bar in the Solar
boot plugin. The styling of the progress bar doesn't really match the
surrounding artwork.
Charlie mentioned on the bug report that this was to match the Nodoka
theme. I think it doesn't really work because pro
27 matches
Mail list logo