Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-18 Thread Paolo Leoni
I've only a little propose: it can be useful writing on the rear of the sleeves some Fedora mains features, like version of kernel and Xorg. -- Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org GPG fingerprint: DAD1 6419 D42B 0B1C D9E1 A9CB 4587 4812 17F7 F764

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-16 Thread Jon Stanley
2008/10/16 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Good point. We can't really say just PCs either thanks to Apple's switch to Intel CPUs. May be a little nitpicky, but what's wrong with calling a machine made by Apple (regardless of whether it has a ppc, pcc64, or Intel chip) a PC? By every

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-16 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:30 -0400, Jarod Wen wrote: Hi Adam, Thanks for your comment. In fact the sentence has been changed back to be i686 Live CD to conform to the names in the download page of live cd. Please find the new version from the top of the list. The names on the download

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-16 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 16:32 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: Am I completely wrong that For Intel-compatible PCs is better for the users to whom we're handing these out? If we were to make special 64-bit covers, I'd suggest For 64-bit PCs. The number of 64-bit

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-16 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 10:18 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: 2008/10/16 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Good point. We can't really say just PCs either thanks to Apple's switch to Intel CPUs. May be a little nitpicky, but what's wrong with calling a machine made by Apple (regardless of

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-16 Thread Jarod Wen
May be a little nitpicky, but what's wrong with calling a machine made by Apple (regardless of whether it has a ppc, pcc64, or Intel chip) a PC? By every definition (other than Apple's marketing), it is a personal computer thereby qualifying it as a PC. Personally, I wish I could see on the

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-16 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:07 -0400, Jarod Wen wrote: May be a little nitpicky, but what's wrong with calling a machine made by Apple (regardless of whether it has a ppc, pcc64, or Intel chip) a PC? By every definition (other than Apple's marketing), it is a personal computer thereby

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-15 Thread Jarod Wen
Hi Adam, Thanks for your comment. In fact the sentence has been changed back to be i686 Live CD to conform to the names in the download page of live cd. Please find the new version from the top of the list. Thanks! On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: There is a typo at:

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-15 Thread Adam Pribyl
There is a typo at: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/r5/Artwork_MediaArt_F10_CDSleeve_1.png For all Inter-Compatible PCs - For all Intel-Compatible PCs. even though inter-compatible PC is also nice.:) Adam Pribyl ___

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-08 Thread Nicu Buculei
John Poelstra wrote: Here is an interesting comparison I noticed at OSCON this year after stopping by the SuSE booth http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/paste-bin/suse-vs-fedora-cover.jpg I realize there are differing philosophies as to how much or little content should be on the cover and

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-08 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:57 -0500, Ian Weller wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:01:16PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: The x86_32 should simply be x86. Actually, in the case of the Live CD, it should be i686. Or, for installer CDs, i386. (from what I remember) Stamping these technicalities

The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-07 Thread Jarod Wen
The planets are updated to the one in the following file. Another version with less colors will come soon. The link is unchanged: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/sleeve_arts.html Best, On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-07 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 13:54 -0400, Jarod Wen wrote: The planets are updated to the one in the following file. Another version with less colors will come soon. The link is unchanged: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/sleeve_arts.html Other people have already

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-07 Thread John Poelstra
Paul W. Frields said the following on 10/07/2008 05:01 PM Pacific Time: On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 13:54 -0400, Jarod Wen wrote: The planets are updated to the one in the following file. Another version with less colors will come soon. The link is unchanged:

Re: The third draft for F10 Solar CD/DVD sleeves

2008-10-07 Thread Ian Weller
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:01:16PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: The x86_32 should simply be x86. Actually, in the case of the Live CD, it should be i686. Or, for installer CDs, i386. (from what I remember) -- Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ianweller.org GnuPG