Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
But it doesn't change the fact. Form styling (not the alignment, the appearance css part) MUST be removed or changed to non-rectangular (rectangles were nice in win9x epoch). Dnia 24-12-2007, pon o godzinie 23:53 +, Kevin Kofler pisze: Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek jakub.rusinek at gmail.com writes:

Re: Echo set of camera-photo icons draft

2007-12-25 Thread Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
Of course higher size = more details, but remember - icon must be readable at all. Dnia 24-12-2007, pon o godzinie 16:33 -0800, Mark pisze: 2007/12/24, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Maybe they're too dark but icons are too small to show photo-realistic things. Icons should be only

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Michael Beckwith
Well, you can do the appealing to the people that be that dictate the default appearance of any sort of basic form appearance for forms. It's nothing that the art or the website team have anything to do with. Until you can appeal to the people that set this, you can either use a browser that

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Michael Beckwith
I see nothing wrong with styling it for those who have support for it. It's a web accessability thing. Ability to style it and see a nice looking form, or if your browser doesn't support it, then it still gets form controls with the universal default which still allows it to be useable. If

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
You don't understand. Rectangular widgets, non-native are ugly and they're making websites looking more out-of-the-box, what's wrong. Dnia 25-12-2007, wto o godzinie 12:23 -0600, Michael Beckwith pisze: I see nothing wrong with styling it for those who have support for it. It's a web

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Michael Beckwith
FP.org is not a Web 2.0centric website. The most important thing for it to do is present information about Fedora. If you really want to have things with the form change, contact the right mailing list and appeal your case to them. Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: You don't understand.

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
What styling form has to do with Web2.0? What you're talking about, man?! Dnia 25-12-2007, wto o godzinie 13:16 -0600, Michael Beckwith pisze: FP.org is not a Web 2.0centric website. The most important thing for it to do is present information about Fedora. If you really want to have things

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Michael Beckwith
Actually, Jakub, could you do me a favor and link to a page or image of the type of form styling you would like to see? ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
Google.com - native widgets. Dnia 25-12-2007, wto o godzinie 15:58 -0600, Michael Beckwith pisze: Actually, Jakub, could you do me a favor and link to a page or image of the type of form styling you would like to see? ___ Fedora-art-list mailing

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Michael Beckwith
Why should I do a google search for something you're arguing for? I don't have a problem with what I'm seeing when I visit the page. Just for the sake of not arguing, I did do a google search for both native widgets and didn't find any sort of examples of what I was asking for. Maybe I'm just

Re: Form widgets on fpo website

2007-12-25 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: Hi, I don't know who made CSS for fpo, but he should know, that native widgets look better than rectangular ugly ones... Especially when Firefox 3 is gonna arrive very quickly. FWIW, - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/ShowUs