On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Paolo Leoni wrote:
2009/5/10 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
Actually, Ian's comments notwithstanding, the gradient on the logo
should be removed. Where it's not necessary, we shouldn't arbitrarily
change the logo appearance, since
On Monday 11 May 2009 00:14:59 Paolo Leoni wrote:
2009/5/10 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
Actually, Ian's comments notwithstanding, the gradient on the logo
should be removed. Where it's not necessary, we shouldn't arbitrarily
change the logo appearance, since that violates the logo
On 05/11/2009 03:29 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Paolo Leoni wrote:
No problem. Below you can find a new revision with some corrections (logo
gradient removed, screenshot with new plymouth plugin...)
2009/5/11 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
Thanks for those changes, Paolo!
You're welcome! :-)
Are there any other issues with
these banners that need to be looked at?
I think we have definitives versions for both banners (small and big):
Released banner - big:
2009/5/10 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org
The gradient in the logo is fine. The shadows on the logo and the '11'
are way too dark. See the most recent large release image on the
current fp.o for an example of what it should look like.
I've updated the banner with less shadows on 11 and
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Paolo Leoni wrote:
2009/5/10 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org
The gradient in the logo is fine. The shadows on the logo and the '11'
are way too dark. See the most recent large release image on the
current fp.o for an example of what it
2009/5/10 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
Actually, Ian's comments notwithstanding, the gradient on the logo
should be removed. Where it's not necessary, we shouldn't arbitrarily
change the logo appearance, since that violates the logo usage
guidelines.
Also, it looks like there is an
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 05:46:39PM -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-05-09 05:45:38 PM, Paolo Leoni wrote:
I propose you also a draft of big version for F11 release banner:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/c6/Fedora11-released-banner-big_1.png
On 05/08/2009 03:35 AM, Paolo Leoni wrote:
2009/5/4 Nicu Buculei
The basic layout is good (maybe the placement ans size of the logo
could be better) but I think it would be an interesting idea to
change the wording somehow so it includes the F11 slogan (Reign).
I've two new
On 05/08/2009 05:29 PM, Paolo Leoni wrote:
In this case I think that version 1 is the best until now. But about
your proposal for the slogan, I'm in trouble because I don't know how
make it in the banner without render it too plenty of stuff...
No worry, it was just a suggestion, we use it
2009/5/4 Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro
The basic layout is good (maybe the placement ans size of the logo could be
better) but I think it would be an interesting idea to change the wording
somehow so it includes the F11 slogan (Reign).
I've two new versions, one of these includes the
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:58:44PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 05/05/2009 01:47 PM, Marc Ferguson wrote:
If I wanted to edit this file... Is there a .xcf file or is the .svg
file the source. I'm new to svg's. Overall; I love the banner. I don't
Yes, SVG is the source and it is vector
On 05/01/2009 12:02 PM, Paolo Leoni wrote:
Hi there,
we're approaching to another, great, fedora release.
So, it's time to get some banners ;-)
The basic layout is good (maybe the placement ans size of the logo could
be better) but I think it would be an interesting idea to change the
13 matches
Mail list logo
