Re: Pungi kickstart packages - stage2 deps vs instaled pkgs

2008-09-03 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:21 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: Perhaps this is by design: the build tools dependencies (anaconda-runtime an friends) which end up in stage2 AFAICS need to be listed (and their dependencies met) in the main packages listing in the kickstart file. Is there a way to

Pungi / anaconda: seeding the pkg selection

2008-09-03 Thread Martin Langhoff
The installer cd I'm trying to build (for the School Server) is driven by 2 custom packages - a metapackage that pulls in all the dependenciess, and a configuration package that whacks /etc . Feeding those to Pungi via a kickstart file gets them on the installer CD, but does not get them

Re: Pungi / anaconda: seeding the pkg selection

2008-09-03 Thread Seth Vidal
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 18:46 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: The installer cd I'm trying to build (for the School Server) is driven by 2 custom packages - a metapackage that pulls in all the dependenciess, and a configuration package that whacks /etc . Feeding those to Pungi via a kickstart

Re: Pungi / anaconda: seeding the pkg selection

2008-09-03 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Seth Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why not a kickstart with 'interactive' in the file: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-kickstart2-options.html Bah, too easy to be true -- ;-) Thanks a lot for the hint -

Re: Pungi kickstart packages - stage2 deps vs instaled pkgs

2008-09-03 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Martin Langhoff wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't the case with rawhide pungi. Great to hear that - sounds like it'll be nice to build small ISOs. Is the rawhide Pungi reasonably usable on F9? I think not, because pungi uses the

Re: Pungi / anaconda: seeding the pkg selection

2008-09-03 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Martin Langhoff wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Seth Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why not a kickstart with 'interactive' in the file: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-kickstart2-options.html Bah, too easy to be true -- ;-) Thanks

Re: koji-1.2.6

2008-09-03 Thread Doug Ledford
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:28 -0400, Mike McLean wrote: It's been a long time since we posted a fresh tarball, so I just tagged and posted 1.2.6. Following is a summary of changes since 1.2.5. A couple of them /may/ cause some slight upgrade issues. Any idea when updated packages for koji will

Re: koji-1.2.6

2008-09-03 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 09:48:28 am Doug Ledford wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:28 -0400, Mike McLean wrote: It's been a long time since we posted a fresh tarball, so I just tagged and posted 1.2.6. Following is a summary of changes since 1.2.5. A couple of them /may/ cause some

Re: Pungi / anaconda: seeding the pkg selection

2008-09-03 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Martin Langhoff 1.1 - The interactive install should have a custom 'default' layout for the autopartitioning. Can I seed that somehow? 2 - Support a fully automated kickstart install (non-default option in grub menu). This is also an example for local teams

Re: Pungi kickstart packages - stage2 deps vs instaled pkgs

2008-09-03 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case, Revisor can already do what you're looking for on Fedora 9 genuine. Cool. I've spent a good part of today playing with your good Revisor. I have a few questions, hopefully not too OT for fedora-buildsys