On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 18:15, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote:
cdamian:BADURL:wikicalendar-1.15.tar.gz:mediawiki-wikicalendar
Just checked this one and it works. Probably was a temporary problem
with googlecode .
Christof
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken
2009/8/19 Ankit Patel an...@redhat.com:
Is there any way to get notification, when packages (re)build is done?
I am referring to task - Ongoing Test Package Builds for Translation
Review, Thu 2009-09-10 to Mon 2009-09-14 from the schedule, where FLP
(Fedora Localization Project) team of
Michel Salim writes:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 19:57 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
-pthread means -D_REENTRANT and -lpthread. -D_REENTRANT is basically
useless and you should use standard feature test macros or _GNU_SOURCE for
what you want. So just linking with -lpthread is what I would call the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
Compose started at Thu Aug 20 06:15:06 UTC 2009
New package anjal
An email client for small screen devices
New package liblastfm
Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
New package mutter-moblin
Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter
New package nss-util
Network Security
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what
it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.
But it depend on
Rex Dieter wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
...
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL
Dne Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:51:04 +0400 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
napsal(a):
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known
Thank you for the answers.
20.08.2009 16:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
Fedora does not allow stand-alone kernel module packages. This would need
to be included in the kernel RPM itself. The best way to get that to happen
is to get the driver into the upstream kernel.
Yes, but not I developer of it.
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what
it is not permitted) and built
2009/8/19 Adam Miller maxamill...@gmail.com:
Hello all,
I decided posting this to the devel-list would be most appropriate
because I assume it to be the crowd who would put something like this
to use (but I could be wrong). I threw together a little Firefox AddOn
that adds the pkgdb as a
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
progressed smoothly, haven't tried runtime yet (though, seeing that your
So, just noticed I needed to install texlive-csplain in order to have
it, but it does not work:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
restricted
Hello, All!
2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@ru.bir.ru:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
This module has very sad story - since, it was made as a result of
direct
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known
20.08.2009 18:01, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello, All!
2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)fo...@ru.bir.ru:
I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
This module has very sad story -
Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live
I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.
--
Ing.
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
packages and will
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
repo update.
Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
psutils ... (is there a better place to note
Not much progress has been made on sage. Perhaps this can help:
http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/wiki/Installation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Once upon a time, Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com said:
Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
psutils ... (is there a better place to note this sort of thing?)
Why would texlive replace a stand-alone package (that has been around
forever as a stand-alone package)?
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
seems to depend on a package called texlive-xetex which isn't
provided in the new repository, and therefore pulls in the whole old
version of texlive from the core repository
A general reminder. As we are out of Alpha freeze now, that means we are not
taking tag requests for F12 Alpha any longer. The package set for Alpha has
been finalized.
Thanks
josh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
help with testing :)
One more issue: some
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 16:29 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Please be sure you remove all the old formats generated with the old
TeX Live. In most cases clearing the /var/lib/texmf/ and ~/.texlive* contents
should make it work.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
repo update.
Another related upgrade issue:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:
I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it,
the
reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
anything other
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:
I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
Thanks for calling it
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Pavel Lisy wrote:
Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:48:00PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
seems to depend on a package called texlive-xetex which isn't
provided in the new repository, and
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:20:47.0 +0100
@@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@
/packagelist
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Is Moblin a trademark of anybody?
If you're adding a group, be sure to add it to a category as well.
--
Jesse Keating
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
Yes there are.
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
packages and will likely be released this year. And before that
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's really great.
I appreciate the work on
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
... this seems
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Is Moblin a trademark of anybody?
Intel has
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Peter, thanks for all your work
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Eventually I plan on having a moblin spin but not for F-12. The work
in Fedora at the moment is separate to anything that is coming from
Moblin. The advantage that Fedora will have that at the moment
upstream Moblin
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:11:31PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains
Hi Norbert,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Jindrich,
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jindrich Novy wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
How do you handle installation of
texlive-scheme-*
since the schemes are overlapping? AFAIR rpm does
JN == Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com writes:
JN These virtual provides, such as tex(tex), tex(latex) or tex(xetex)
JN were added at the beginning of the year 2008 so it works at least
JN for Fedora 9 and higher.
JN We should file bugs for these packages.
There are many, many more packages that
JLT == Jason L Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
JLT There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at
JLT build time. Notably every R package, most likely because of
JLT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R.
I have adjusted the guideline page to reference tex(latex), but I
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:
rpm -Uhv
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Any chance you could build this for Rawhide as well?
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
process from the build
On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
They're eternally broken on ppc64. Mostly due to Mono
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
breaking compatibility with any of the corner cases people expect from
a general purposes OS like
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:26:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JLT == Jason L Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
JLT There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at
JLT build time. Notably every R package, most likely because of
JLT
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
breaking compatibility with
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
+packagelist
+ packagereq type=mandatorymutter/packagereq
+ packagereq
It looks to me as if some people need to learn how to talk to eachother.
Look at this!
A big update package for Mono packages:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6615
Date Released: 2009-06-18 11:01:34
gbrainy,
giver,
gnome-do,
mono-zeroconf,
ipod-sharp,
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:41 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go
I have submitted a libva package for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
this is for VAAPI video playback acceleration. It's a freedesktop
project which stands a reasonable chance of being the umbrella standard
for hardware-accelerated video playback in future, so it's
I've orphaned the following packages in pkgdb:
gquilt
quilt
jfsutils
josh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30191
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
- 518278
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32519
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
- 518278
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32763
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
- 518278
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12258
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 1.30 (fix memleak when SSL handshake failed)
Add buildreq procps needed for
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15197/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources
Log Message:
Resync with devel (fix memleak, i18n, and error handling)
Index: .cvsignore
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15197/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources
Log Message:
Resync with devel (fix memleak, i18n, and error handling)
Index: .cvsignore
Author: eseyman
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24930
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 1.3
Index: .cvsignore
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5698
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec sources
Added Files:
perl-Alien-wxWidgets-SONAME.patch
Log Message:
- new upstream version
- add
71 matches
Mail list logo
