On 08/30/2009 12:21 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
Chasing the kaleidoscopic change of platforms is a non-starter for me
as a software developer. I want to buy the box, jumpstart it, and it
should get into the cloud right away, with my software pulled from
the repo and running on it.
It sounds like
On Monday 31 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
This should be fixed with the new packages in the repository now.
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
tetex-IEEEtran
tetex-bytefield
tetex-elvevier
tetex-perltex
tetex-prosper
and these utilities:
dvipdfm
Compose started at Tue Sep 1 06:15:07 UTC 2009
New package bickley
A meta data management API and framework
New package camorama
Gnome webcam viewer
New package hunspell-shs
Shuswap hunspell dictionaries
New package maven2-plugin-shade
Maven Shade Plugin
New
2009/8/31 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr:
Hello,
I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should
take my comments with caution...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
I think
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 07:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me.
There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file
whenever the prelink package gets installed/removed. According to a comment
in the spec
Hi,
this has recently come up in a discussion about the License tags of gcc and
mingw32-gcc. The guidelines are very clear here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
If your package contains files which are under multiple, distinct, and
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:02 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
redhat-lsb-3.2-5.fc12.i686 requires /usr/bin/[
This appears to be a bug in the report script? [ definitely exists in
coreutils-7.5-3.fc12.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:11 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
nphilipp:
rss-glx
/usr/bin/rss-glx-rss-glx_install.pl
This file isn't needed on Fedora, I've built 0.9.0-3 without it.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:02 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
redhat-lsb-3.2-5.fc12.i686 requires /usr/bin/[
This appears to be a bug in the report script? [ definitely exists in
coreutils-7.5-3.fc12.
coreutils-7.5-3.fc12 is not yet in that rawhide summary (built
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-31/fedora-meeting.2009-08-31-18.15.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-31/fedora-meeting.2009-08-31-18.15.txt
Log:
On 09/01/2009 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
rpm could start refcounting directories any day now and that'd be just
fine.
Is there an open trac ticket on this issue with the RPM upstream?
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/8/31 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr:
Hello,
I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should
take my comments with caution...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:10 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/01/2009 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
rpm could start refcounting directories any day now and that'd be just
fine.
Is there an open trac ticket on this issue with the RPM upstream?
Not that I can see. I had assumed their
2009/9/1 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
IIRC xdvipdfmx is from texlive (but has not been updated for some time)
Well, technically, upstream is the xetex project
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiid=xetex_linux
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[snip]
Yes... this is all correct. Any package that is using commas in the
license field should have a bug opened against it.
Unless it's Redistributable, no modification permitted, presumably?
--
Iain.
--
On 09/01/2009 11:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:10 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/01/2009 09:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
rpm could start refcounting directories any day now and that'd be just
fine.
Is there an open trac ticket on this issue with the RPM upstream?
On 09/01/2009 11:53 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
[snip]
Yes... this is all correct. Any package that is using commas in the
license field should have a bug opened against it.
Unless it's Redistributable, no
2009/8/31 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com:
2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems
like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and
obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though
Upstream hasn't had a release since 2007, and it seems pretty dependent
on nautilus-cd-burner which no longer exists. Would take significant
patching to make work again, so I'm dumping it for now.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
2009/8/31 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
We already have ssmtp, esmtp. Is this something different?
I don't think they have local mail delivery capability, though that is
being worked on for esmtp.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
2009/9/1 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com:
Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your
package provides 11.84.
AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is
another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or
the texlive
Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2009, 18:48 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
2009/8/31 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
We already have ssmtp, esmtp. Is this something different?
I don't think they have local mail delivery capability, though that is
being worked on for esmtp.
Does dma have a
Greetings,
As you may recall, last Thursday was the Dracut Test Day [1]. The event
was well attended. Thanks to all participants for lending their time,
feedback and bug reports. Also, kudos to Alex Todorov and Jan Stodola
who helped write and execute the root=nbd [2] and root=nfs [3] dracut
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
On 09/01/2009 06:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 07:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me.
There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file
whenever the prelink package gets
Hi folks,
I need this package reviewed so that I can fix the broken dep on
xsupplicant in rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017
I'd be happy to do a review trade, just let me know.
Thanks,
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I need this package reviewed so that I can fix the broken dep on
xsupplicant in rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017
I'd be happy to do a review trade, just let me know.
Will do
David Cantrell wrote:
But I explained in the previous reply how to cycle the interface
using either the network service or NetworkManager. I still view
this as something more technical users will be familiar with and for
the average user, simply rebooting the system is the easiest method.
No,
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Working on something else I stumbled across this:
http://fpaste.org/jDwM/
that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in
rawhide.
seems a bit dodgy to me.
Can you file bugs?
Bill
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Working on something else I stumbled across this:
http://fpaste.org/jDwM/
that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in
rawhide.
seems a bit dodgy to me.
Can you file
Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com) said:
triggers were the suggestion of the package reviewer to avoid
multi-ownership(IIRC). If there is unanimity on what the correct
solution should be, I'm sure Elio would be happy to implement it. Moving
/etc/prelink.conf.d to filesystem would
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:44 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
filesystem package.
Then the guidelines should be fixed to create less confusion over the
matter.
Dne 1.9.2009 23:40, Seth Vidal napsal(a):
I probably CAN. :)
I'll run it again shortly and dump them in.
Then please skip:
ignoring obsolete pkg lzma-4.32.7-3.fc12.i686
obsoleted by xz-lzma-compat', 'i686', '0', '4.999.9', '0.1.beta.fc12'
...that's intended.
Regards,
Milos
--
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
No, the easiest method is:
The following updates require their respective services to be restarted for
the updates to take effect. List of services. Proceed? [Yes] [No]
I don't think it makes sense to treat
Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
No, the easiest method is:
The following updates require their respective services to be restarted
for the updates to take effect. List of services. Proceed? [Yes] [No]
I don't
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Then please skip:
ignoring obsolete pkg lzma-4.32.7-3.fc12.i686
obsoleted by xz-lzma-compat', 'i686', '0', '4.999.9', '0.1.beta.fc12'
...that's intended.
Huh? How is it intended to have an obsolete package around in Rawhide? The
old lzma should get blocked.
Could someone please add the attached patch to Asterisk in Rawhide, to
allow it to build against the new openssl. The patch is not related to
the new version of openssl, but to the updated version of spandsp. This
is a backport from Asterisk 1.6.1.5 (and possibly earlier versions).
BTW - is
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Quentin Armitagequen...@armitage.org.uk wrote:
Could someone please add the attached patch to Asterisk in Rawhide, to
allow it to build against the new openssl. The patch is not related to
the new version of openssl, but to the updated version of spandsp. This
We need to send to upstream the patches.
maintaining thousand's of patches is not a easy work
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jeffrey Olliej...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Quentin Armitagequen...@armitage.org.uk
wrote:
Could someone please add the attached patch to
it seems that anaconda wants that anaconda's upgrade requires a
version that is strictly older than current
ie. one can't upgrade an alpha/bera or even same version
I suggest the following
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Milos Jakubicek wrote:
Then please skip:
ignoring obsolete pkg lzma-4.32.7-3.fc12.i686
obsoleted by xz-lzma-compat', 'i686', '0', '4.999.9', '0.1.beta.fc12'
...that's intended.
Huh? How is it intended to have an obsolete package around in Rawhide?
I'm starting to be really bothered by this. Today kdenetwork requires
restart due to... fix Bug 515586 - Kopete: New Messages from changed
resource arrive in new tab/window. Wouldn't login/logout sequence do?
And that only if the user really cared, i.e. was using Kopete and this
bug was really
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504389
Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16158
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Aug 08 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.25-1
- switch to
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18526
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sun Aug 23 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.22-1
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Event/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21419
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Event.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Sep 01 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.12-1
- add perl_default_filter
- auto-update to 1.12
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sysadm-Install/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28089
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Sysadm-Install.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 0.32 (make UTF-8 handling configurable, not automatic)
Index: .cvsignore
perl-JSON has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
perl-JSON-2.15-3.fc12.noarch requires perl(JSON::PP)
On x86_64:
perl-JSON-2.15-3.fc12.noarch requires perl(JSON::PP)
On i386:
perl-JSON-2.15-3.fc12.noarch requires perl(JSON::PP)
On ppc64:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-FileHandle-Unget/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3520
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-FileHandle-Unget.spec sources
Log Message:
- Update to 0.1623
- fix uninitialized value warning and incorrect behaviour (CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509819
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520530
--- Comment #4 from Penelope Fudd ker...@pkts.ca 2009-09-01 12:58:43 EDT ---
As this is a normal practice, could it be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520530
--- Comment #6 from Penelope Fudd ker...@pkts.ca 2009-09-01 14:14:06 EDT ---
Ok, now that I know about the requirement for
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 22:10 -0400, Jack Tanner wrote:
Howdy,
I'd like to get the ggplot2 library package-able. I cannot sign up as a
maintainer, but I can work on spec files. ggplot2 has a whole bunch of
dependencies:
According to http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ ,
I
53 matches
Mail list logo
