tis 2009-10-27 klockan 13:24 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:16:46 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Id like to get some feedback on the patches that i'm proposing for F-13.
quite a few packages that need to deal with
On 27. okt. 2009 22:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 21:10, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What hardware is this?
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
[Golan] Network Connection (rev 02)
(And it
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:18 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
5) How many untagged packages are there?
koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate
I ran this today (just for kicks). It gives back 323 packages. Even
Just a quick question for those who know:
The shared libs from libgcc: /lib/libgcc*so* are not required by
anything:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
no package requires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
I have a vague memory that libstdc++ uses this runtime for e.g.
2009/10/28 Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com:
Just a quick question for those who know:
The shared libs from libgcc: /lib/libgcc*so* are not required by
anything:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
no package requires libgcc-4.4.1-2.fc11.i586
Use this
On 10/22/2009 02:48 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Hi,
/sbin/installkernel doesn't pass --dracut to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg, so a
make install from a kernel.org kernel tree tries to
invoke /sbin/mkinitrd rather than dracut. Is that intentional?
Also, any ideas on why a dracut-generated initramfs
Jud Craft wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But this is about C++.
I don't mean to misunderstand, but if I recall from your very first
post in this thread...
Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code generator, not the
native ones.
Hence I
Eric Springer wrote:
As for C++, I couldn't get some of my programs to compile as it seemed
to spew at some of the template usage. Anyway it looks very promising
and I look forward to using it in the future (especially with its
non-nonsense licensing).
So you don't consider it nonsense to
Rawhide Report wrote:
Removed package lam
Why was this package removed that late in F12's cycle, causing these broken
dependencies:
blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0
blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0
orsa-lam-0.7.0-11.fc12.i686 requires lam
Haïkel Guémar wrote:
libmusicbrainz is an indirect dependence of listen (through
libtunepimp), if no one steps, i'll sure have to.
They need to upgrade to libmusicbrainz3. The libtunepimp/libmusicbrainz
protocol won't be supported server-side anymore very soon. :-(
There's also stuff in KDE
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:47:33AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:18 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
5) How many untagged packages are there?
koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate
I
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Springer wrote:
As for C++, I couldn't get some of my programs to compile as it seemed
to spew at some of the template usage. Anyway it looks very promising
and I look forward to using it in the future (especially with its
On 10/28/2009 06:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jud Craft wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But this is about C++.
I don't mean to misunderstand, but if I recall from your very first
post in this thread...
Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:43:17AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 22:48, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 27. okt. 2009 21:10, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What hardware is this?
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation
Compose started at Wed Oct 28 06:15:09 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
banshee-1.5.1-0.3.git20090917.fc12.i686 requires mono(Mono.Zeroconf) =
0:2.0.0.76
galeon-2.0.7-16.fc12.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.1.3
Broken
Are the nightly composes (such as this:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
Best regards
Andreas
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the nightly composes (such as this:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
I believe F-12 and rawhide are still one and
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:12:03PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Are the nightly composes (such as this:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
Both. Rawhide _is_ what will become F12. At least until it's
Tue 20-Oct Mon 02-Nov Beta Testing
Fri 30-Oct Fri 30-Oct Blocker Bug Day (F12Blocker) #2
Mon 02-Nov Mon 02-Nov End of Beta Testing
Wed 04-Nov Wed 04-Nov Compose RC
Wed 04-Nov Wed 04-Nov Enable Fedora 12 Updates
Wed 04-Nov Wed 11-Nov Test RC
Mon 09-Nov Mon 09-Nov F12 Blocker Review
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:41 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/28 Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com:
Just a quick question for those who know:
The shared libs from libgcc: /lib/libgcc*so* are not required by
anything:
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -q --whatrequires
I've been trying to get axis2 built for F11. The newest version that meets all the dependencies is axis2 1.3 due to maven2 being only at 2.0.4. Axis2 1.3 nearly builds except for failing tests for the Scripting Module:---T E S T
* gr...@verizon.net gr...@verizon.net [2009-10-28 12:42]:
This appears to be related to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
+source/openjdk-6/+bug/255149
What is the best way to workaround this rhino problem with openjdk6?
I recommend emailing fedora-devel-java-list.
Andrew
--
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/27/2009 03:49 PM, Martin Dubuc wrote:
This is a very nice tool. Unfortunately, on my system running Fedora 11,
I
get the following erro:
Can't open RFKILL control device: No such file or directory
Using
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:28 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Yep, that feature isn't in kernels that old.
I have the same problem with a Philco 1001 notebok (intel atom) and
F11.
You mean a 2.6.30 kernel is too old?
Exactly. Fedora tends to run with a
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 01:41:34 am Alexander Boström wrote:
tis 2009-10-27 klockan 13:24 -0500 skrev Dennis Gilmore:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:16:46 pm Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Id like to get some feedback on the patches that
On 10/27/2009 05:06 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
SD == Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com writes:
SD On the server (Which is suggested): Add the following entry to the
SD /etc/exports file:
SD / *(ro,fsid=0)
SD Note: 'fsid=0' is explained in the exports(5) man pages.
Could someone
It sounds like you are saying that there is no way to export the same
host filesystems with the same client-perceived names under v4 as was
being done before under v[23]. Is that really true?
My old /etc/exports is:
/mirror*(ro,insecure,sync,mp,all_squash)
So clients
On 28. okt. 2009 13:05, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
What make and model is the laptop?
It is a Compal HGL31
(Compal is selling their laptops under a lot of different brands)
Rgds.
Ola Thoresen
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
It has come to our attention the nightly cvs checkout tarballs stopped
working. A restorecon later and we're back in business. Just letting
everyone know.
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/webfiles/
-Mike
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com writes:
I thought dist-f12-updates-candidate were packages that had been build
for F-12 but had not yet been tagged. It doesn't necessarily mean they
are going to be pushed into F-12.
True, but there is no way to say right now which one would those be.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:04:25 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:28 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Yep, that feature isn't in kernels that old.
I have the same problem with a Philco 1001 notebok (intel
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:06:02PM +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com writes:
I thought dist-f12-updates-candidate were packages that had been build
for F-12 but had not yet been tagged. It doesn't necessarily mean they
are going to be pushed into F-12.
True,
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC users on
fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI Macs, such as a beige
G3 desktop? My impression is that no one has tried it on an oldworld
Mac in the last few releases, and that getting it to boot at all would
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC users on
fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI Macs, such as a beige
G3 desktop? My impression is that no one has tried it on an oldworld
No, it
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:52:13PM +, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com writes:
We had around 400 0-day stable updates for F11 if I'm remembering correctly.
Which makes me think - as many should be part of the release as possible,
right?
Yep. Which is why bodhi
The time is almost here to reap the harvest on which so many have toiled and
enjoy the bounty that is Fedora 12. With each new Fedora release comes some
Bugzilla housekeeping. This e-mail is designed to let you know about two things
happening around November 17, 2009 (Fedora 12 release day)
Author: mjakubicek
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-PPI/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3710
Modified Files:
perl-PPI.spec sources
Log Message:
- Sync from devel/ to 1.206 to be able to update perl-Perl-Critic
Index: perl-PPI.spec
Author: mjakubicek
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Perl-Critic/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28764
Modified Files:
perl-Perl-Critic.spec sources
Log Message:
- Fix FTBFS: sync from devel/ branch because of incorrect sources file (didn't
match version)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526872
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-28 18:21:12 EDT ---
rt3-3.6.9-1.el5 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529172
--- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-10-29 01:02:25 EDT
---
Hmm. If you can, get me some of the XML
40 matches
Mail list logo
