I'm currently packaging lessfs and there are apparently a couple
libraries that are a part of it that have become a cause for concern
by the reviewer (rightfully so) and I'm hoping someone could offer a
recommendation of how to go about packaging them.
Review Request:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM, nodata l...@nodata.co.uk wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever steal
focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell window, or
in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should ever take keyboard focus
away
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, psmith psm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
hey guys i'm hoping to package gerix-wifi-cracker-ng(1) for fedora and i'm
looking for someone who i can look to for help if i need it, is there a list
of names i can look to? or what is the reccomended path?
tia
phil
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
SNIP
maxamillion:BADURL:firestarter-1.0.3.tar.gz:firestarter
SNIP
This package has been retired.
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/firestarter/devel/
... the other one I will be taking care of shortly :)
-AdamM
--
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Adrian adrian.jo...@fedoraproject.ro wrote:
Hi,
A news of a new calculation of PI is on the net. Should we digg
(http://digg.com/d31EgvV) the article in order to promote the fact that the
author used Fedora 10 for he's success ?
Best regards,
Adrian
--
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
like
Safe travels! See you next year. :)
-Adam (From Android - CM)
On Dec 19, 2009 2:16 AM, Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com wrote:
Hi, all.
Sincerest apologies for the lack of recent activity and the short notice
here, but I'm going to be vacationing with family for the next couple of
weeks.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
SNIP
You guys do realize that there is really only 2 things the Make system
handles on the CVS side for you? Creating a tag (which we won't need in
dist-git), and importing an srpm. Other than that you've been using
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
SNIP
It has been in the plans all along to hide most/all of git behind fedpkg
calls, even more than cvs was hidden. I just wanted to make the point
that very very little of CVS was hidden. The only added potentially
+1 to Adam W because I'm an ultra git neophyte (and a CVS one for that
matter) but the current make file automation essentially removes that as an
issue. I'm not saying I'm against learning git if need be, but I agree that
it would be an unfortunate regression.
-Adam (From Android - CM)
On Dec
There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
build against webkitgtk if I were to build the latest as a potential
stable update for
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
snip
Note that this update does not change ABI.
It's a stable bugfix release only...
kevin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Sorry,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com wrote:
SNIP
From my own brief testing, Epiphany has no apparent problems with it
either.
I think it should be fine as an update; but like any other version bump,
we'd want to have it in updates-testing for a reasonable
Thank you greatly for the well worded and well thought out response/update
on the situation. In a thread of what was essentially a flame war, it is
nice to see something constructive and meaningful emerge from the ashes.
-Adam (From Android - CM)
On Nov 19, 2009 8:30 PM, Owen Taylor
many apologies, just trying to sort out my list posting setup.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
fedora-devel-list
Setup my fp.org email recently and now testing sending to the list from my
myTouch.
-Adam (From Android)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I think this is an awesome idea, and yes I think this version of the
verbage is more clear. Kudos to Jesse (and all those involved in the
development of the idea of the split rawhide) and I hope to see this
come to fruition.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
I would also like to jump on the help train if there is anything I am able
to lend a hand with.
-Adam (From Android)
On Oct 22, 2009 9:05 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Adam Miller wrote: I think this is an awesome idea,
and yes I think this ve...
I agree, how
Doesn't it mention somewhere in the wmii documentation that wmii is not
intended for packaging because many of the user configuration options are to
be set in a header file pre compile? I could be wrong but seem to remember
reading that about both wmii and ion.
-Adam
From Android
On Oct 3, 2009
I'm pretty sure LUKS handles that stuff, might poke around google for info
on that. I'm unfortunately not extremely familiar with it but if I remember
correctly that is what does it.
-Adam
From Android
On Sep 26, 2009 9:41 AM, Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009
Hey all,
I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
(http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
enough to be shipped but I wanted to mention it to see if anyone might
find a use for it,
:
Dne 28.8.2009 23:33, Adam Miller napsal(a):
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz
wrote: snip I'm ...
Well, imo the point is that we should try to enable the users to get to the
desired package info page (from which they can access
builds/updates/sources/bugs
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:
snip
I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated
my/your/both work, which is just bad:(
Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be glad if you would do
this and keep an eye of
I honestly threw that Firefox AddOn together in order to scratch an
itch that I had, I released it for general consumption because I was
hoping someone else could benefit. I honestly never sat down and
thought of user vs. developer implications of use or $other.
-Adam
--
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Aurelien Bompardgau...@free.fr wrote:
I'm orphaning a few packages I'm not using anymore, feel free to take over:
snip
- apachetop -- A top-like display of Apache log
snip
I'd like to take this one, I use it quite often. I'll be taking
ownership in Fedora pkgdb
You might not have gotten around to it, but it appears you only
orphaned the devel branch of apachetop, wasn't sure if you want to
continue to maintain the stable branches but no longer beyond that or
completely orphan?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote:
snip
maxamillion:BADURL:dc3dd-6.12.3.tar.gz:dc3dd
maxamillion:BADURL:oggvideotools-0.7b.tar.gz:oggvideotools
maxamillion:BADURL:shed-1.15.tar.gz:shed
maxamillion:BADURL:TPG-3.1.2.tar.gz:python-tpg
snip
Mine are fixed and
Today in our F12Alpha Blocker meeting we discussed the status of the
Firefox SELinux bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512845
And we were hoping to get in contact with caillon, stransky, jhorak
for more information on the bug as well as send this to the developer
list in order to
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Murilo Opsfelder
Araujomopsfel...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
how can I run a command in background inside spec file?
snip
I have to ask because my curiosity is killing me what's the use
case for that?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Right, aggressive between Fedora releases, conservative within a Fedora
release. I kind of wish everybody did that, and actually treated our
stable releases as, you know, stable releases, otherwise what's the
point
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
We've had this discussion before, but to re-state my opinion: the only
sane way to handle this is multiple, discretionary update repositories.
A repository for security and stable bugfix updates, and a repository
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Mark
Bidewellmark.bidew...@alumni.clemson.edu wrote:
snip
+1
snip
Would we want to consider putting together a proposal for something
that is OpenSuSE Buildservice styled in order to satisfy this?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
We ship rather a lot of applications which are fairly useless without an
internet connection. If the data is downloaded from the internet when
you run _the installed program_, I don't see any problem here.
snip
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
SNIP
Backing up a minute, in discussions among the desktop team and other
people about this, one thing that came up as a specific problem with
having no firewall at all was the public WiFi hotspot case. If for
example I
I maintain fail2ban for EPEL, I can just take the Fedora package as
well unless someone else has a relatively high interest in doing so (I
purely maintain it for EPEL because we use it at work on our servers
and Axel said he had no interest in packaging it for EPEL). I've
needed to contact Axel in
[08:46:58][a...@turnip][src]+ rpmlint scselinux.spec
scselinux.spec:91: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux
scselinux.spec:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scselinux/*
scselinux.spec:93: E: hardcoded-library-path in
I am curious as to this answer as well because prelink has been
something that actually hurt my netbook in performance so I nuked it.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
+1 on the Books idea but I feel obligated to do something along the lines of:
Insert snide remark about code vs. content here
But I shall refrain.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is
OK to be packaged in Fedora. This means, for example, that things
like: fonts, themes, clipart, and wallpaper are OK.
So does a programming book enhance the OS
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Davidbouncingc...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, but if the package payload doesn't interoperate with another
package, I can't see the point. Fonts, artwork, sure, they are a
system resource for other software.
By that logic a book distributed in PDF is a system resource
I would like to take http_ping and pscan.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Arjan van de Venar...@infradead.org wrote:
how common are docking stations in practice?
(as opposed to port extenders)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
That said, Kubuntu and Xubuntu aren't really completely separate either,
they're just marketed as such. They're really just spins from the same
repository. The way they're marketed as separate is really silly.
They are
2009/6/30 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 06/30/2009 09:28 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
梁穗隆 on 06/30/2009 10:51 AM wrote:
So I really hope that solang will replace f-spot soon. And solang has
more new features than f-spot.
I don't see a package review request or any koji
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Davidbouncingc...@gmail.com wrote:
Re the discussion at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01991.html
The below suggestion tries to satisfy all parties:
- it presents a neutral default
- it presents a simple choice for newbie who
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
Fedora Live Image --- A link that downloads the Gnome or KDE image,
picked at random by a script. SNIP
Now its just getting silly... What a support nightmare that would be.
user I need help
fedora-member What desktop are
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Michael Cronenworthm...@cchtml.com wrote:
What if the Fedora version had a suffix?
Fedora 11G - Gnome
11K - KDE
11X - XFCE
11S - no desktop (server?)
Seems silly, too, yes, but just an idea.
Somewhat silly, but the naming convention
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Well, Ubuntu will have a problem at that point as well (see Kubuntu and
Xubuntu). ;-) Maybe we should write a U Desktop Environment just to give
them trouble. ^^
That's actually a little different, Kubutu and Xubuntu
A lot of users think they have a Dell CPU. The result of giving them
one that doesn't work will be try something else before you download
Fedora.
I completely agree, I told my father on the phone just today to open
his web browser as I was helping him deal with some wireless issues
and he had
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Christopher
Stonechris.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Whatever desktop RH employees are paid to work on to satisfy their
biggest RHEL customers needs. Or what they *think* their biggest RHEL
customers want.
I think the question you need to ask is why they must force
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:29 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Niels Haase wrote:
GNOME KDE - official support from fedora (first class citizen)
XFCE - spin only (second class citizen)
LXDE - remix only (third class
Couldn't you use strace?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Just curious... Is the KDE liveCD considered a Spin or an official
release image?
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Ian Welleri...@ianweller.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:18:52PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
Just curious... Is the KDE liveCD considered a Spin or an official
release image?
KDE Live ISOs are official, last time I checked.
If it is official, I think
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I too would like to see KDE treated as a first-class citizen, rather than
blindly pushing Gnome to the ignorant masses.
The problem with this is that you are now pushing two things blindly
at ignorant masses,
On 6/26/09, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Adam Miller wrote:
As I have brought up to Kevin Kofler in IRC, I think before we did
something like that we would need to first look into having the KDE
SIG spawn up documentation that matches the gnome-centric docs
As I replied
+1 For the i686 with atom optimizations. This seems like a solid suggestion
and Gregory's argument seems logical.
-Adam
(From my G1)
On Jun 23, 2009 11:49 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Clemens Eissererlinuxhi...@gmail.com
wrote: 1) Optimizing
On 6/16/09, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I honestly don't care whether or not it's influenced by what I think. I
just wish you project put some thought and effort into discovering why
people ask for or download split CDs other than just shutting off
I have read a lot of people voice their opinion on what they think to be a
flaw in the benchmark. How about we as a group put together a documented
benchmark process along with justification as to why those methods were
chosen to reflect real world scenarios and from there send it to reviewers
I'm retired firestarter, I picked it up recently as it was orphaned
but as we are moving towards PolicyKit and there's no upstream to
assist with the port and after a discussion we had here on the list I
decided it was time to retire it.
Now, with that being said, I have some users on the
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke
mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Matt Domsch wrote:
What about dropping hierarchical mirroring altogether? Why hasn't someone
developed a distributed (i.e. bittorrent-like) system for mass mirroring?
:-)
--
Matthew
Please do not quote
We had a really long debate about this package in #fedora-devel
yesterday and it basically boils down to
1) Need fedora-legal to check the legality of the app not verifying
user's age and legality of the URL of the site being in the C source.
2) If fedora-legal say it is legal, then its up to the
I recently picked up the firestarter package because it was orphaned
and I know a few people who still use it. There were only a couple of
small bugs opened against it so I figured I would hack at them as soon
as I was able. But this morning there was a bug filed against it to
port it to PolicyKit
If upstream is dead and you are not going to do the work, just close the
bug as WONTFIX. Yes, I filed the RFE in the first place but I wasn't
aware that upstream is dead. So don't let that scare you from continuing
to be the maintainer of it. Of course, if anyone is willing to do the
work,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Cry cry_regar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any chance of filing a set of RFEs against system-config-firewall for the
features that firestarter has that system-config-firewall is still missing?
I like that idea, I've retired firestarter and will begin to file RFEs
once
65 matches
Mail list logo
